DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness

Journal Article · · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1934 · OSTI ID:1463173
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [1]
  1. MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA – Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal
  2. MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA – Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal, Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR University of Algarve Campus de Gambelas Faro Portugal
  3. National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, USR 3278 CNRS‐EPHE‐UPVD Maison des Océans Paris France, Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL Moorea French Polynesia
  4. Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR University of Algarve Campus de Gambelas Faro Portugal
  5. MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA – Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal, Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR University of Algarve Campus de Gambelas Faro Portugal, National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, USR 3278 CNRS‐EPHE‐UPVD Maison des Océans Paris France, Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL Moorea French Polynesia

The number of marine protected areas ( MPA s) has grown exponentially worldwide over the past decade in order to meet international targets. Most of these protected areas allow extraction of resources and are therefore designated as “partially protected areas” ( PPA s). However, the effectiveness of PPA s remains unclear due to the high variability of use types permitted. Here, we carried out what we believe to be the first global meta‐analysis of PPA s using a regulation‐based classification system for MPA s to assess their ecological effectiveness. This novel classification allows for unambiguous differentiation between areas according to allowed use, which is the key feature determining PPA performance. Highly and moderately regulated areas exhibited higher biomass and abundance of commercial fish species, whereas fish abundance and biomass in weakly regulated areas differed little from unprotected areas. Notably, the effectiveness of moderately regulated areas can be enhanced by the presence of an adjacent fully protected area. We concluded that limited and well‐regulated uses in PPA s and the presence of an adjacent fully protected area confer ecological benefits, from which socioeconomic advantages are derived.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1463173
Journal Information:
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Journal Name: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Journal Issue: 7 Vol. 16; ISSN 1540-9295
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (24)

Italian marine reserve effectiveness: Does enforcement matter? journal March 2008
Applying empirical estimates of marine protected area effectiveness to assess conservation plans in British Columbia, Canada journal December 2014
A regulation-based classification system for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) journal October 2016
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features journal February 2014
Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally journal March 2017
Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean journal July 2015
Ecological effects of full and partial protection in the crowded Mediterranean Sea: a regional meta-analysis journal August 2017
Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas journal September 2015
Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management journal March 2010
Effect Size in Ecological Experiments: The Application of Biological Models in Meta‐Analysis journal December 1997
No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean journal August 2017
Demographic effects of full vs. partial protection from harvesting: inference from an empirical before-after control-impact study on Atlantic cod journal July 2015
Evaluating the relative conservation value of fully and partially protected marine areas journal May 2013
Marine reserves: size and age do matter journal May 2008
Global Effects of Local Human Population Density and Distance to Markets on the Condition of Coral Reef Fisheries: Cinner et al. journal October 2012
Reexamining the science of marine protected areas: linking knowledge to action: MPA science: linking knowledge to action journal November 2011
Making waves: The science and politics of ocean protection journal October 2015
Management Effectiveness of the World's Marine Fisheries journal June 2009
Global Human Footprint on the Linkage between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning in Reef Fishes journal April 2011
Baselines and Degradation of Coral Reefs in the Northern Line Islands journal February 2008
Response of Rocky Reef Top Predators (Serranidae: Epinephelinae) in and Around Marine Protected Areas in the Western Mediterranean Sea journal June 2014
The Meta-Analysis of Response Ratios in Experimental Ecology journal June 1999
Biological responses in marine no-take reserves versus partially protected areas journal September 2008
Evaluating effects of total and partial restrictions to fishing on Mediterranean rocky-reef fish assemblages journal July 2009