DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness

Abstract

The number of marine protected areas ( MPA s) has grown exponentially worldwide over the past decade in order to meet international targets. Most of these protected areas allow extraction of resources and are therefore designated as “partially protected areas” ( PPA s). However, the effectiveness of PPA s remains unclear due to the high variability of use types permitted. Here, we carried out what we believe to be the first global meta‐analysis of PPA s using a regulation‐based classification system for MPA s to assess their ecological effectiveness. This novel classification allows for unambiguous differentiation between areas according to allowed use, which is the key feature determining PPA performance. Highly and moderately regulated areas exhibited higher biomass and abundance of commercial fish species, whereas fish abundance and biomass in weakly regulated areas differed little from unprotected areas. Notably, the effectiveness of moderately regulated areas can be enhanced by the presence of an adjacent fully protected area. We concluded that limited and well‐regulated uses in PPA s and the presence of an adjacent fully protected area confer ecological benefits, from which socioeconomic advantages are derived.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [1]
  1. MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA – Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal
  2. MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA – Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal, Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR University of Algarve Campus de Gambelas Faro Portugal
  3. National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, USR 3278 CNRS‐EPHE‐UPVD Maison des Océans Paris France, Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL Moorea French Polynesia
  4. Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR University of Algarve Campus de Gambelas Faro Portugal
  5. MARE Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA – Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal, Centre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR University of Algarve Campus de Gambelas Faro Portugal, National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, USR 3278 CNRS‐EPHE‐UPVD Maison des Océans Paris France, Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL Moorea French Polynesia
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1463173
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Journal Volume: 16 Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1540-9295
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Zupan, Mirta, Fragkopoulou, Eliza, Claudet, Joachim, Erzini, Karim, Horta e Costa, Bárbara, and Gonçalves, Emanuel J. Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/fee.1934.
Zupan, Mirta, Fragkopoulou, Eliza, Claudet, Joachim, Erzini, Karim, Horta e Costa, Bárbara, & Gonçalves, Emanuel J. Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1934
Zupan, Mirta, Fragkopoulou, Eliza, Claudet, Joachim, Erzini, Karim, Horta e Costa, Bárbara, and Gonçalves, Emanuel J. Thu . "Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1934.
@article{osti_1463173,
title = {Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness},
author = {Zupan, Mirta and Fragkopoulou, Eliza and Claudet, Joachim and Erzini, Karim and Horta e Costa, Bárbara and Gonçalves, Emanuel J.},
abstractNote = {The number of marine protected areas ( MPA s) has grown exponentially worldwide over the past decade in order to meet international targets. Most of these protected areas allow extraction of resources and are therefore designated as “partially protected areas” ( PPA s). However, the effectiveness of PPA s remains unclear due to the high variability of use types permitted. Here, we carried out what we believe to be the first global meta‐analysis of PPA s using a regulation‐based classification system for MPA s to assess their ecological effectiveness. This novel classification allows for unambiguous differentiation between areas according to allowed use, which is the key feature determining PPA performance. Highly and moderately regulated areas exhibited higher biomass and abundance of commercial fish species, whereas fish abundance and biomass in weakly regulated areas differed little from unprotected areas. Notably, the effectiveness of moderately regulated areas can be enhanced by the presence of an adjacent fully protected area. We concluded that limited and well‐regulated uses in PPA s and the presence of an adjacent fully protected area confer ecological benefits, from which socioeconomic advantages are derived.},
doi = {10.1002/fee.1934},
journal = {Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment},
number = 7,
volume = 16,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Aug 02 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Thu Aug 02 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1934

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 82 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Applying empirical estimates of marine protected area effectiveness to assess conservation plans in British Columbia, Canada
journal, December 2014


Marine reserves: size and age do matter
journal, May 2008


Evaluating effects of total and partial restrictions to fishing on Mediterranean rocky-reef fish assemblages
journal, July 2009

  • Di Franco, A.; Bussotti, S.; Navone, A.
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 387
  • DOI: 10.3354/meps08051

Reexamining the science of marine protected areas: linking knowledge to action: MPA science: linking knowledge to action
journal, November 2011


Effect Size in Ecological Experiments: The Application of Biological Models in Meta‐Analysis
journal, December 1997

  • Osenberg, Craig W.; Sarnelle, Orlando; Cooper, Scott D.
  • The American Naturalist, Vol. 150, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1086/286095

Italian marine reserve effectiveness: Does enforcement matter?
journal, March 2008


Management Effectiveness of the World's Marine Fisheries
journal, June 2009


No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean
journal, August 2017

  • Sala, Enric; Giakoumi, Sylvaine
  • ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 75, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx059

Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management
journal, March 2010

  • Gaines, S. D.; White, C.; Carr, M. H.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 43
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906473107

Ecological effects of full and partial protection in the crowded Mediterranean Sea: a regional meta-analysis
journal, August 2017

  • Giakoumi, Sylvaine; Scianna, Claudia; Plass-Johnson, Jeremiah
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08850-w

Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean
journal, July 2015

  • Halpern, Benjamin S.; Frazier, Melanie; Potapenko, John
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8615

Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas
journal, September 2015

  • Caselle, Jennifer E.; Rassweiler, Andrew; Hamilton, Scott L.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep14102

Making waves: The science and politics of ocean protection
journal, October 2015


Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally
journal, March 2017

  • Gill, David A.; Mascia, Michael B.; Ahmadia, Gabby N.
  • Nature, Vol. 543, Issue 7647
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature21708

Global Effects of Local Human Population Density and Distance to Markets on the Condition of Coral Reef Fisheries: Cinner et al.
journal, October 2012


Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
journal, February 2014

  • Edgar, Graham J.; Stuart-Smith, Rick D.; Willis, Trevor J.
  • Nature, Vol. 506, Issue 7487
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13022

Evaluating the relative conservation value of fully and partially protected marine areas
journal, May 2013

  • Sciberras, Marija; Jenkins, Stuart R.; Mant, Rebecca
  • Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 16, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/faf.12044

Response of Rocky Reef Top Predators (Serranidae: Epinephelinae) in and Around Marine Protected Areas in the Western Mediterranean Sea
journal, June 2014

  • Hackradt, Carlos Werner; García-Charton, José Antonio; Harmelin-Vivien, Mireille
  • PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098206

Baselines and Degradation of Coral Reefs in the Northern Line Islands
journal, February 2008


Global Human Footprint on the Linkage between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning in Reef Fishes
journal, April 2011


The Meta-Analysis of Response Ratios in Experimental Ecology
journal, June 1999


A regulation-based classification system for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
journal, October 2016


Biological responses in marine no-take reserves versus partially protected areas
journal, September 2008

  • Lester, Se; Halpern, Bs
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 367
  • DOI: 10.3354/meps07599

Demographic effects of full vs. partial protection from harvesting: inference from an empirical before-after control-impact study on Atlantic cod
journal, July 2015

  • Fernández-Chacón, Albert; Moland, Even; Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
  • Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 52, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12477