DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The atmospheric hydrologic cycle in the ACME v0.3 model

Abstract

We examine the global water cycle characteristics in the Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy v0.3 model (a close relative to version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model) in atmosphere-only simulations spanning the years 1980–2005. We evaluate the simulations using a broad range of observational and reanalysis datasets, examine how the simulations change when the horizontal resolution is increased from 1° to 0.25, and compare the simulations against models participating in the the Atmosphere Model Intercomparison Project of the 5th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). Particular effort has been made to evaluate the model using the best available observational estimates and verifying model biases with additional datasets when differences are known to exist among the observations. Regardless of resolution, the model exhibits several biases: global-mean precipitation, evaporation, and precipitable water are too high, light precipitation occurs too frequently, and the atmospheric residence time of water is too short. Many of these biases are shared by the multi-model mean climate of models participating in CMIP5. The reasons behind regional biases in precipitation are discussed by examining how different fields, such as local evaporation and transport of water vapor, contribute to the bias. Although increasing the horizontal resolution does not drastically change themore » water cycle, it does lead to a few differences: an increase in global mean precipitation rate, an increase in the fraction of total precipitation that falls over land, more frequent heavy precipitation (>30 mm day-1), and a decrease in precipitable water. One of the most notable changes is the shift of precipitation produced by the convective parameterization to that produced by the large-scale microphysics parameterization. We analyze how changes in moisture and circulation with resolution contribute to this shift in the precipitation partitioning. Because changing horizontal resolution requires some re-tuning, the effect of that tuning was evaluated by performing an additional simulation at 1 but using the tunings from the 0.25 simulation. In conclusion, the evaluation shows that the more frequent heavy precipitation, the decrease in precipitable water, and the shift from convective to large-scale precipitation are predominantly due to resolution changes, while tuning changes have a major influence on the global mean precipitation and the land/ ocean partitioning of precipitation.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States). Cloud Processes Research Group
  2. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR)
OSTI Identifier:
1468074
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1461872
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; AC02-06CH11357; AC02-05CH11231; AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Climate Dynamics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 50; Journal Issue: 9-10; Journal ID: ISSN 0930-7575
Publisher:
Springer-Verlag
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Water cycle; Precipitation; Climate modeling; Horizontal resolution; Model evaluation

Citation Formats

Terai, Christopher R., Caldwell, Peter M., Klein, Stephen A., Tang, Qi, and Branstetter, Marcia L. The atmospheric hydrologic cycle in the ACME v0.3 model. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x.
Terai, Christopher R., Caldwell, Peter M., Klein, Stephen A., Tang, Qi, & Branstetter, Marcia L. The atmospheric hydrologic cycle in the ACME v0.3 model. United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x
Terai, Christopher R., Caldwell, Peter M., Klein, Stephen A., Tang, Qi, and Branstetter, Marcia L. Fri . "The atmospheric hydrologic cycle in the ACME v0.3 model". United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1468074.
@article{osti_1468074,
title = {The atmospheric hydrologic cycle in the ACME v0.3 model},
author = {Terai, Christopher R. and Caldwell, Peter M. and Klein, Stephen A. and Tang, Qi and Branstetter, Marcia L.},
abstractNote = {We examine the global water cycle characteristics in the Accelerated Climate Modeling for Energy v0.3 model (a close relative to version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model) in atmosphere-only simulations spanning the years 1980–2005. We evaluate the simulations using a broad range of observational and reanalysis datasets, examine how the simulations change when the horizontal resolution is increased from 1° to 0.25, and compare the simulations against models participating in the the Atmosphere Model Intercomparison Project of the 5th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). Particular effort has been made to evaluate the model using the best available observational estimates and verifying model biases with additional datasets when differences are known to exist among the observations. Regardless of resolution, the model exhibits several biases: global-mean precipitation, evaporation, and precipitable water are too high, light precipitation occurs too frequently, and the atmospheric residence time of water is too short. Many of these biases are shared by the multi-model mean climate of models participating in CMIP5. The reasons behind regional biases in precipitation are discussed by examining how different fields, such as local evaporation and transport of water vapor, contribute to the bias. Although increasing the horizontal resolution does not drastically change the water cycle, it does lead to a few differences: an increase in global mean precipitation rate, an increase in the fraction of total precipitation that falls over land, more frequent heavy precipitation (>30 mm day-1), and a decrease in precipitable water. One of the most notable changes is the shift of precipitation produced by the convective parameterization to that produced by the large-scale microphysics parameterization. We analyze how changes in moisture and circulation with resolution contribute to this shift in the precipitation partitioning. Because changing horizontal resolution requires some re-tuning, the effect of that tuning was evaluated by performing an additional simulation at 1 but using the tunings from the 0.25 simulation. In conclusion, the evaluation shows that the more frequent heavy precipitation, the decrease in precipitable water, and the shift from convective to large-scale precipitation are predominantly due to resolution changes, while tuning changes have a major influence on the global mean precipitation and the land/ ocean partitioning of precipitation.},
doi = {10.1007/s00382-017-3803-x},
journal = {Climate Dynamics},
number = 9-10,
volume = 50,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jul 28 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Fri Jul 28 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 30 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Table 1 Table 1: Set of tuning parameters and physics time steps that differ and are used in the NE120 simulations, NE30 simulations, NE30 simulation with NE120 tunings, and the atmosphere model used in the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble (CESM LENS) project

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Convergence of aqua-planet simulations with increasing resolution in the Community Atmospheric Model, Version 3
journal, January 2008


High-resolution simulations of global climate, part 1: present climate
journal, November 2003


Impact of the LMDZ atmospheric grid configuration on the climate and sensitivity of the IPSL-CM5A coupled model
journal, July 2012

  • Hourdin, Frédéric; Foujols, Marie-Alice; Codron, Francis
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 40, Issue 9-10
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-012-1411-3

CAM-SE: A scalable spectral element dynamical core for the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, November 2011

  • Dennis, John M.; Edwards, Jim; Evans, Katherine J.
  • The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, Vol. 26, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1177/1094342011428142

Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycle – Part 1: Temporal characteristics over land
journal, January 2014

  • Wang-Erlandsson, L.; van der Ent, R. J.; Gordon, L. J.
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-5-441-2014

How well can CMIP5 simulate precipitation and its controlling processes over tropical South America?
journal, November 2012


An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations
journal, September 2012

  • Stephens, Graeme L.; Li, Juilin; Wild, Martin
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1580

The role of horizontal resolution in simulating drivers of the global hydrological cycle
journal, September 2013

  • Demory, Marie-Estelle; Vidale, Pier Luigi; Roberts, Malcolm J.
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 42, Issue 7-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-013-1924-4

Global Precipitation at One-Degree Daily Resolution from Multisatellite Observations
journal, February 2001


Australia's CMIP5 submission using the CSIRO-Mk3.6 model
journal, March 2013

  • Jeffrey, S.; Rotstayn, L.; Collier, M.
  • Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal, Vol. 63, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.22499/2.6301.001

The ACCESS coupled model: description, control climate and evaluation
journal, March 2013

  • Bi, D.; Dix, M.; Marsland, S.
  • Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal, Vol. 63, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.22499/2.6301.004

The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations
journal, January 2011

  • Bellouin, N.; Collins, W. J.; Culverwell, I. D.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 4, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-4-723-2011

On overestimation of tropical precipitation by an atmospheric GCM with prescribed SST
journal, October 1999

  • Kitoh, Akio; Arakawa, Osamu
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 26, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999GL900616

Objectively Analyzed Air–Sea Heat Fluxes for the Global Ice-Free Oceans (1981–2005)
journal, April 2007

  • Yu, Lisan; Weller, Robert A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/bams-88-4-527

The JRA-25 Reanalysis
journal, January 2007

  • Onogi, Kazutoshi; Tsutsui, Junichi; Koide, Hiroshi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 85, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.85.369

The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics
journal, January 2015

  • Kobayashi, Shinya; Ota, Yukinari; Harada, Yayoi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 93, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001

Effect of horizontal resolution on ECHAM6-AMIP performance
journal, November 2014

  • Hertwig, Eileen; von Storch, Jin-Song; Handorf, Dörthe
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 45, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-014-2396-x

The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set
journal, August 2008


Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
journal, February 2013


Changes in precipitation with climate change
journal, March 2011


Energetics of Climate Models: net Energy Balance and Meridional Enthalpy Transport
journal, January 2011


Challenges and Opportunities in Water Cycle Research: WCRP Contributions
journal, December 2012


Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle
journal, September 2002


The Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble Project: A Community Resource for Studying Climate Change in the Presence of Internal Climate Variability
journal, August 2015

  • Kay, J. E.; Deser, C.; Phillips, A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1

The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
journal, April 2011

  • Dee, D. P.; Uppala, S. M.; Simmons, A. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 656
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.828

The processes governing horizontal resolution sensitivity in a climate model
journal, July 2002


CORE.2 Global Air-Sea Flux Dataset
dataset, January 2008

  • Yeager, Stephen G.; Large, William G.
  • UCAR/NCAR - Research Data Archive
  • DOI: 10.5065/D6WH2N0S

The energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models
journal, December 2014


Impact of horizontal resolution on climate model forecasts of tropical precipitation and diabatic heating for the TWP-ICE period
journal, January 2010

  • Boyle, James; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014262

The Canadian Fourth Generation Atmospheric Global Climate Model (CanAM4). Part I: Representation of Physical Processes
journal, February 2013


An observational radiative constraint on hydrologic cycle intensification
journal, December 2015

  • DeAngelis, Anthony M.; Qu, Xin; Zelinka, Mark D.
  • Nature, Vol. 528, Issue 7581
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature15770

Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century
journal, April 2004

  • Cox, P. M.; Betts, R. A.; Collins, M.
  • Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Vol. 78, Issue 1-3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00704-004-0049-4

Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis
journal, January 2013

  • Mueller, B.; Hirschi, M.; Jimenez, C.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 17, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013

The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate
journal, January 2013

  • Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I.; Debernard, J. B.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013

The effect of time steps and time-scales on parametrization suites
journal, August 2012

  • Williamson, David L.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 139, Issue 671
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.1992

The Earth's energy balance
journal, December 2015


On the quantification of oceanic rainfall using spaceborne sensors: OCEANIC RAIN QUANTIFICATION BY SATELLITE
journal, October 2012

  • Behrangi, Ali; Lebsock, Matthew; Wong, Sun
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017979

A multimodel intercomparison of resolution effects on precipitation: simulations and theory
journal, February 2016

  • Rauscher, Sara A.; O’Brien, Travis A.; Piani, Claudio
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 47, Issue 7-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-015-2959-5

Metrics and Diagnostics for Precipitation-Related Processes in Climate Model Short-Range Hindcasts
journal, March 2013


The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation
journal, January 2012


The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–Present)
journal, December 2003


Exploratory High-Resolution Climate Simulations using the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)
journal, May 2014

  • Bacmeister, Julio T.; Wehner, Michael F.; Neale, Richard B.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00387.1

The Basic Effects of Atmosphere–Ocean Thermal Coupling on Midlatitude Variability*
journal, February 1998


A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, June 2009


AIRS: Improving Weather Forecasting and Providing New Data on Greenhouse Gases
journal, July 2006

  • Chahine, Moustafa T.; Pagano, Thomas S.; Aumann, Hartmut H.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 87, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-87-7-911

Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models
journal, September 2006


The Dynamical Core, Physical Parameterizations, and Basic Simulation Characteristics of the Atmospheric Component AM3 of the GFDL Global Coupled Model CM3
journal, July 2011

  • Donner, Leo J.; Wyman, Bruce L.; Hemler, Richard S.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI3955.1

AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project
journal, December 1992


The Community Climate System Model Version 4
journal, October 2011

  • Gent, Peter R.; Danabasoglu, Gokhan; Donner, Leo J.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1

Evaluation of the Hydrological Cycle in the ECHAM5 Model
journal, August 2006

  • Hagemann, Stefan; Arpe, Klaus; Roeckner, Erich
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3831.1

The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales
journal, February 2007

  • Huffman, George J.; Bolvin, David T.; Nelkin, Eric J.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM560.1

The Observed State of the Energy Budget in the Early Twenty-First Century
journal, November 2015


Bulk Parameterization of Air-Sea Exchanges of Heat and Water Vapor Including the Molecular Constraints at the Interface
journal, September 1979


Impact Mechanisms of Shallow Cumulus Convection on Tropical Climate Dynamics
journal, June 2007

  • Neggers, Roel A. J.; Neelin, J. David; Stevens, Bjorn
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 20, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI4079.1

The Atmospheric Energy Constraint on Global-Mean Precipitation Change
journal, January 2014


Changes in the Distribution of Rain Frequency and Intensity in Response to Global Warming
journal, November 2014


A New Global Water Vapor Dataset
journal, June 1996


The Observed State of the Water Cycle in the Early Twenty-First Century
journal, November 2015


Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive: GISS MODEL-E2 CMIP5 SIMULATIONS
journal, March 2014

  • Schmidt, Gavin A.; Kelley, Max; Nazarenko, Larissa
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000265

An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

Estimates of the Global Water Budget and Its Annual Cycle Using Observational and Model Data
journal, August 2007

  • Trenberth, Kevin E.; Smith, Lesley; Qian, Taotao
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM600.1

Earth's Global Energy Budget
journal, March 2009

  • Trenberth, Kevin E.; Fasullo, John T.; Kiehl, Jeffrey
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 90, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1

Atmospheric Moisture Transports from Ocean to Land and Global Energy Flows in Reanalyses
journal, September 2011

  • Trenberth, Kevin E.; Fasullo, John T.; Mackaro, Jessica
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4171.1

Improved Climate Simulation by MIROC5: Mean States, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity
journal, December 2010

  • Watanabe, Masahiro; Suzuki, Tatsuo; O’ishi, Ryouta
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1

Improving Latent and Sensible Heat Flux Estimates for the Atlantic Ocean (1988–99) by a Synthesis Approach*
journal, January 2004


The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model Climate configurations
journal, January 2011

  • Bellouin, N.; Collins, W. J.; Culverwell, I. D.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-4-765-2011

Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis
text, January 2013


Works referencing / citing this record:

Multi-model evaluation of the sensitivity of the global energy budget and hydrological cycle to resolution
journal, December 2018

  • Vannière, Benoît; Demory, Marie-Estelle; Vidale, Pier Luigi
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 52, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-018-4547-y

Sensitivity of seasonal flood simulations to regional climate model spatial resolution
journal, May 2019

  • Castaneda-Gonzalez, Mariana; Poulin, Annie; Romero-Lopez, Rabindranarth
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 53, Issue 7-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-019-04789-y

Regionally refined test bed in E3SM atmosphere model version 1 (EAMv1) and applications for high-resolution modeling
journal, January 2019

  • Tang, Qi; Klein, Stephen A.; Xie, Shaocheng
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-2679-2019

TheDiaTo (v1.0) – a new diagnostic tool for water, energy and entropy budgets in climate models
journal, January 2019

  • Lembo, Valerio; Lunkeit, Frank; Lucarini, Valerio
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-3805-2019