skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: Comparative analysis of transport and storage options from a CO 2 source perspective

This study evaluated integrated CCS costs from the perspective of a CO 2 source. A source will have captured CO 2 requiring suitable storage and affordable transportation between source and storage. Capture, transport, and storage are the links of the CCS value chain. For this study, capture costs were modeled for six hypothetical sources (various industrial and power-generation facilities) with annual CO 2 capture rates ranging from 0.65 to 3.90 million tonnes (Mt). Seven storage reservoirs located in the Appalachian, Illinois and Gulf Coast Basins—and of various quality with respect to CO 2 storage—were modeled: two within the Rose Run Formation, three within the Mount (Mt.) Simon Formation, one in the Lower Tuscaloosa Formation, and one in the Frio Formation. Storage costs were calculated with the FE/NETL CO 2 Saline Storage Cost Model for the seven selected storage reservoirs under dome and regional dip structural settings. For transportation, a dedicated pipeline system and a trunkline pipeline system were modeled. Transportation costs from source to storage reservoirs were evaluated using the FE/NETL CO 2 Transport Cost Model. A source may not always be able to find suitable proximal storage. Low CCS costs reflect a source’s mass of captured CO 2 findingmore » suitable storage within an affordable transportation distance. Economies of scale are present in each link of the CCS value chain. These economies of scale are limited with respect to storage or the distance captured CO 2 can be transported to storage.« less
Authors:
 [1] ;  [2] ;  [2] ;  [3] ;  [4] ;  [1] ;  [1]
  1. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  2. Leidos, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  3. Deloitte, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  4. KeyLogic Systems, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
NETL-PUB-21287
Journal ID: ISSN 1750-5836; PII: S1750583617307120
Grant/Contract Number:
FE0025912
Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 72; Journal ID: ISSN 1750-5836
Publisher:
Elsevier
Research Org:
National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; dedicated pipeline; trunkline; CCS costs; capture; transport; storage; source-to-sink matching
OSTI Identifier:
1461760

Grant, Timothy, Guinan, Allison, Shih, Chung Yan, Lin, ShangMin, Vikara, Derek, Morgan, David, and Remson, Donald. Comparative analysis of transport and storage options from a CO2 source perspective. United States: N. p., Web. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.03.012.
Grant, Timothy, Guinan, Allison, Shih, Chung Yan, Lin, ShangMin, Vikara, Derek, Morgan, David, & Remson, Donald. Comparative analysis of transport and storage options from a CO2 source perspective. United States. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.03.012.
Grant, Timothy, Guinan, Allison, Shih, Chung Yan, Lin, ShangMin, Vikara, Derek, Morgan, David, and Remson, Donald. 2018. "Comparative analysis of transport and storage options from a CO2 source perspective". United States. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.03.012. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1461760.
@article{osti_1461760,
title = {Comparative analysis of transport and storage options from a CO2 source perspective},
author = {Grant, Timothy and Guinan, Allison and Shih, Chung Yan and Lin, ShangMin and Vikara, Derek and Morgan, David and Remson, Donald},
abstractNote = {This study evaluated integrated CCS costs from the perspective of a CO2 source. A source will have captured CO2 requiring suitable storage and affordable transportation between source and storage. Capture, transport, and storage are the links of the CCS value chain. For this study, capture costs were modeled for six hypothetical sources (various industrial and power-generation facilities) with annual CO2 capture rates ranging from 0.65 to 3.90 million tonnes (Mt). Seven storage reservoirs located in the Appalachian, Illinois and Gulf Coast Basins—and of various quality with respect to CO2 storage—were modeled: two within the Rose Run Formation, three within the Mount (Mt.) Simon Formation, one in the Lower Tuscaloosa Formation, and one in the Frio Formation. Storage costs were calculated with the FE/NETL CO2 Saline Storage Cost Model for the seven selected storage reservoirs under dome and regional dip structural settings. For transportation, a dedicated pipeline system and a trunkline pipeline system were modeled. Transportation costs from source to storage reservoirs were evaluated using the FE/NETL CO2 Transport Cost Model. A source may not always be able to find suitable proximal storage. Low CCS costs reflect a source’s mass of captured CO2 finding suitable storage within an affordable transportation distance. Economies of scale are present in each link of the CCS value chain. These economies of scale are limited with respect to storage or the distance captured CO2 can be transported to storage.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.03.012},
journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control},
number = ,
volume = 72,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {4}
}