Assessment of different coarse graining strategies to simulate polydisperse gassolids flow
Continuum methods require the additional development of solids stress closures for polydisperse powders based on complex kinetic theories that are nontrivial to develop, code, and numerically converge for the wide range of fluidization regimes from very dilute to dense/frictional flow limit. On the other hand, it is straightforward to model the flow of polydisperse granular materials by treating particles as discrete rigid bodies that are tracked following simple physical laws of motion. The coarsening of these discrete methods by lumping several particles in a parcel alleviates the significant computational cost associated with these discrete methods while introducing some inaccuracies in the numerical results. In this research, we explore two different coarse graining methods that can be applied to polydisperse powders, namely the same statistic weight method (SSW) and the same size parcel method (SSP), and assess their accuracy by comparison with the finest simulation results obtained with a discrete element method (DEM). For Geldart group B powders fluidized at a relative low superficial velocity, the numerical results indicate that the SSW is more accurate than the SSP method. For type A powders fluidized at relatively high velocity, these two methods predict similar results. Interestingly, up to four times increase inmore »
 Authors:

^{[1]}
;
^{[1]};
^{[2]};
^{[1]}
 National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Morgantown, WV (United States)
 National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Morgantown, WV (United States); AECOM, Morgantown, WV (United States)
 Publication Date:
 Report Number(s):
 NETLPUB21465
Journal ID: ISSN 00092509; PII: S0009250918300034
 Type:
 Accepted Manuscript
 Journal Name:
 Chemical Engineering Science
 Additional Journal Information:
 Journal Volume: 179; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 00092509
 Publisher:
 Elsevier
 Research Org:
 National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States)
 Sponsoring Org:
 USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
 Country of Publication:
 United States
 Language:
 English
 Subject:
 42 ENGINEERING; Discrete element method; Coarse grained method; Polydisperse; Fluidization; Bubbling fluidized bed; FCC particles
 OSTI Identifier:
 1461078
Lu, Liqiang, Xu, Yupeng, Li, Tingwen, and Benyahia, Sofiane. Assessment of different coarse graining strategies to simulate polydisperse gassolids flow. United States: N. p.,
Web. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.003.
Lu, Liqiang, Xu, Yupeng, Li, Tingwen, & Benyahia, Sofiane. Assessment of different coarse graining strategies to simulate polydisperse gassolids flow. United States. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.003.
Lu, Liqiang, Xu, Yupeng, Li, Tingwen, and Benyahia, Sofiane. 2018.
"Assessment of different coarse graining strategies to simulate polydisperse gassolids flow". United States.
doi:10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.003.
@article{osti_1461078,
title = {Assessment of different coarse graining strategies to simulate polydisperse gassolids flow},
author = {Lu, Liqiang and Xu, Yupeng and Li, Tingwen and Benyahia, Sofiane},
abstractNote = {Continuum methods require the additional development of solids stress closures for polydisperse powders based on complex kinetic theories that are nontrivial to develop, code, and numerically converge for the wide range of fluidization regimes from very dilute to dense/frictional flow limit. On the other hand, it is straightforward to model the flow of polydisperse granular materials by treating particles as discrete rigid bodies that are tracked following simple physical laws of motion. The coarsening of these discrete methods by lumping several particles in a parcel alleviates the significant computational cost associated with these discrete methods while introducing some inaccuracies in the numerical results. In this research, we explore two different coarse graining methods that can be applied to polydisperse powders, namely the same statistic weight method (SSW) and the same size parcel method (SSP), and assess their accuracy by comparison with the finest simulation results obtained with a discrete element method (DEM). For Geldart group B powders fluidized at a relative low superficial velocity, the numerical results indicate that the SSW is more accurate than the SSP method. For type A powders fluidized at relatively high velocity, these two methods predict similar results. Interestingly, up to four times increase in the speed of simulation of the SSP method was obtained because the original polydisperse powder is scaled to a monodisperse system in terms of particleparticle collision. Lastly, these results suggest that the SSP method is more favorable for the simulation of fluidized beds due to its accuracy and efficiency while the SSW method may be used for granular flow and dense fluidized bed systems where capturing the size segregation of particles due to collision is important.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.003},
journal = {Chemical Engineering Science},
number = C,
volume = 179,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {1}
}