skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Direct Methane to Methanol: The Selectivity–Conversion Limit and Design Strategies

Abstract

Currently, methane is transformed into methanol through the two-step syngas process, which requires high temperatures and centralized production. While the slightly exothermic direct partial oxidation of methane to methanol would be preferable, no such process has been established despite over a century of research. Generally, this failure has been attributed to both the high barriers required to activate methane as well as the higher activity of the CH bonds in methanol compared to those in methane. However, a precise and general quantification of the limitations of catalytic direct methane to methanol has yet to be established. Herein, we present a simple kinetic model to explain the selectivity–conversion trade-off that hampers continuous partial oxidation of methane to methanol. For the same kinetic model, we apply two distinct methods, using ab initio calculations and fitting to a large experimental database, to fully define the model parameters. We find that both methods yield strikingly similar results, namely, that the selectivity of methane to methanol in a direct, continuous process can be fully described by the methane conversion, the temperature, and a catalyst-independent difference in methane and methanol activation free energies, ΔGa, which is dictated by the relative reactivity of the C–H bonds inmore » methane and methanol. Stemming from this analysis, we suggest several design strategies for increasing methanol yields under the constraint of constant ΔGa. These strategies include “collectors”, materials with strong methanol adsorption potential that can help to lower the partial pressure of methanol in the gas phase, aqueous reaction conditions, and/or diffusion-limited systems. Here, by using this simple model to successfully rationalize a representative library of experimental studies from the diverse fields of heterogeneous, homogeneous, biological, and gas-phase methane to methanol catalysis, we underscore the idea that continuous methane to methanol is generally limited and provide a framework for understanding and evaluating new catalysts and processes.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2]
  1. SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States
  2. SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States, SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
OSTI Identifier:
1460114
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1459595
Grant/Contract Number:  
32 CFR 168a; AC02-76SF00515
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
ACS Catalysis
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: ACS Catalysis Journal Volume: 8 Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 2155-5435
Publisher:
American Chemical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; density functional theory; heterogeneous protecting groups; methane to methanol; methanol collector; partial oxidation; selective oxidation; selectivity−conversion limit

Citation Formats

Latimer, Allegra A., Kakekhani, Arvin, Kulkarni, Ambarish R., and Nørskov, Jens K. Direct Methane to Methanol: The Selectivity–Conversion Limit and Design Strategies. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00220.
Latimer, Allegra A., Kakekhani, Arvin, Kulkarni, Ambarish R., & Nørskov, Jens K. Direct Methane to Methanol: The Selectivity–Conversion Limit and Design Strategies. United States. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00220.
Latimer, Allegra A., Kakekhani, Arvin, Kulkarni, Ambarish R., and Nørskov, Jens K. Fri . "Direct Methane to Methanol: The Selectivity–Conversion Limit and Design Strategies". United States. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00220.
@article{osti_1460114,
title = {Direct Methane to Methanol: The Selectivity–Conversion Limit and Design Strategies},
author = {Latimer, Allegra A. and Kakekhani, Arvin and Kulkarni, Ambarish R. and Nørskov, Jens K.},
abstractNote = {Currently, methane is transformed into methanol through the two-step syngas process, which requires high temperatures and centralized production. While the slightly exothermic direct partial oxidation of methane to methanol would be preferable, no such process has been established despite over a century of research. Generally, this failure has been attributed to both the high barriers required to activate methane as well as the higher activity of the CH bonds in methanol compared to those in methane. However, a precise and general quantification of the limitations of catalytic direct methane to methanol has yet to be established. Herein, we present a simple kinetic model to explain the selectivity–conversion trade-off that hampers continuous partial oxidation of methane to methanol. For the same kinetic model, we apply two distinct methods, using ab initio calculations and fitting to a large experimental database, to fully define the model parameters. We find that both methods yield strikingly similar results, namely, that the selectivity of methane to methanol in a direct, continuous process can be fully described by the methane conversion, the temperature, and a catalyst-independent difference in methane and methanol activation free energies, ΔGa, which is dictated by the relative reactivity of the C–H bonds in methane and methanol. Stemming from this analysis, we suggest several design strategies for increasing methanol yields under the constraint of constant ΔGa. These strategies include “collectors”, materials with strong methanol adsorption potential that can help to lower the partial pressure of methanol in the gas phase, aqueous reaction conditions, and/or diffusion-limited systems. Here, by using this simple model to successfully rationalize a representative library of experimental studies from the diverse fields of heterogeneous, homogeneous, biological, and gas-phase methane to methanol catalysis, we underscore the idea that continuous methane to methanol is generally limited and provide a framework for understanding and evaluating new catalysts and processes.},
doi = {10.1021/acscatal.8b00220},
journal = {ACS Catalysis},
number = 8,
volume = 8,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {6}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00220

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referencing / citing this record:

Thermodynamic Limitations of the Catalyst Design Space for Methanol Production from Methane
journal, October 2018

  • Jocz, Jennifer N.; Medford, Andrew J.; Sievers, Carsten
  • ChemCatChem, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201801438

The Nature and Catalytic Function of Cation Sites in Zeolites: a Computational Perspective
journal, October 2018


Methane Activation and Utilization: Current Status and Future Challenges
journal, December 2019


The special route toward conversion of methane to methanol on a fluffy metal‐free carbon nitride photocatalyst in the presence of H 2 O 2
journal, December 2019

  • Shi, Shangli; Sun, Zhuxing; Bao, Chenyu
  • International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 44, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/er.5088

Misconceptions and challenges in methane-to-methanol over transition-metal-exchanged zeolites
journal, May 2019


Methane selective oxidation to methanol by metal-exchanged zeolites: a review of active sites and their reactivity
journal, January 2019

  • Mahyuddin, Muhammad Haris; Shiota, Yoshihito; Yoshizawa, Kazunari
  • Catalysis Science & Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8cy02414f

Oriented external electric fields as mimics for probing the role of metal ions and ligands in the thermal gas-phase activation of methane
journal, January 2018

  • Geng, Caiyun; Li, Jilai; Schlangen, Maria
  • Dalton Transactions, Vol. 47, Issue 43
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8dt03048k

A renaissance of ligand-to-metal charge transfer by cerium photocatalysis
journal, January 2018

  • Zhao, Rong; Shi, Lei
  • Organic Chemistry Frontiers, Vol. 5, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8qo00893k

Origins of complex solvent effects on chemical reactivity and computational tools to investigate them: a review
journal, January 2019

  • Varghese, Jithin John; Mushrif, Samir H.
  • Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8re00226f

Comparative performance of Cu-zeolites in the isothermal conversion of methane to methanol
journal, January 2019

  • Knorpp, Amy J.; Newton, Mark A.; Mizuno, Stefanie C. M.
  • Chemical Communications, Vol. 55, Issue 78
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9cc05659a

Kinetic study and effect of water on methane oxidation to methanol over copper-exchanged mordenite
journal, January 2020

  • Sushkevich, Vitaly L.; van Bokhoven, Jeroen A.
  • Catalysis Science & Technology, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9cy01711a

Direct conversion of methane to methanol with zeolites: towards understanding the role of extra-framework d-block metal and zeolite framework type
journal, January 2019

  • Raynes, Samuel; Shah, Meera A.; Taylor, Russell A.
  • Dalton Transactions, Vol. 48, Issue 28
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9dt00922a

Chemical looping beyond combustion – a perspective
journal, January 2020

  • Zhu, Xing; Imtiaz, Qasim; Donat, Felix
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9ee03793d

The effect of oxidant species on direct, non-syngas conversion of methane to methanol over an FePO 4 catalyst material
journal, January 2019

  • Dasireddy, Venkata D. B. C.; Hanzel, Darko; Bharuth-Ram, Krish
  • RSC Advances, Vol. 9, Issue 53
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02327e

Catalyst screening for the oxidative coupling of methane: from isothermal to adiabatic operation via microkinetic simulations
journal, January 2020

  • Pirro, Laura; Mendes, Pedro S. F.; Vandegehuchte, Bart D.
  • Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9re00478e

Mo 6 S 8 -based single-metal-atom catalysts for direct methane to methanol conversion
journal, July 2019

  • Zhang, Hao-Tian; Liu, Cheng; Liu, Ping
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 151, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5110875

Partial oxidation of methane to methanol by isolated Pt catalyst supported on a CeO 2 nanoparticle
journal, February 2020

  • Kye, So-Hwang; Park, Hee Sun; Zhang, Renqin
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 152, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5135741