Response to the comment “Uranyl-chloride speciation and uranium transport in hydrothermal brines: Comment on Migdisov et al. (2018)” by Dargent et al.

Journal Article · 19 June 2018 · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.06.015 · OSTI ID:1457312

Migdisov, A. A. ^[1]; Runde, W. ^[1]; Williams-Jones, A. E. ^[2]; Boukhalfa, H. ^[1]; Roback, R. ^[1]; Timofeev, A. ^[2]

---

1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
2. McGill Univ., Montreal, QC (Canada). Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences

We welcome the comments provided by Dargent et al. (2018) and appreciate the effort they have made to evaluate our recently reported data on the stability of uranyl(VI) chloride complexes as function of temperature (Migdisov et al., 2018). We also appreciate the opportunity provided by the editor to clarify issues in our paper that were not clearly articulated or in error.

• Research Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program
• Grant/Contract Number: AC52-06NA25396
• OSTI ID: 1457312
• Report Number(s): LA-UR-18-21513
• Journal Information: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Journal Name: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Vol. 235; ISSN 0016-7037
• Publisher: The Geochemical Society; The Meteoritical SocietyCopyright Statement
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
chloride
hydrothermal
response
spectroscopy
uranyl