DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Solution to the γ γ * η c puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality

Abstract

Here, the next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) pQCD prediction for the γγ* → ηc form factor was evaluated in 2015 using nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD). A strong discrepancy between the NRQCD prediction and the BABAR measurements was observed. Until now there has been no solution for this puzzle. In this paper, we present a NNLO analysis by applying the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC) to set the renormalization scale. By carefully dealing with the light-by-light diagrams at the NNLO level, the resulting high precision PMC prediction agrees with the BABAR measurements within errors, and the conventional renormalization scale uncertainty is eliminated. The PMC is consistent with all of the requirements of the renormalization group, including scheme-independence. The application of the PMC thus provides a rigorous solution for the γγ* → ηc form factor puzzle, emphasizing the importance of correct renormalization scale-setting. The results also support the applicability of NRQCD to hard exclusive processes involving charmonium.

Authors:
; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1439733
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1458417
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-76SF00515; SLAC-PUB-17247; 2016GZ42963; KY [2016]028; KY[2017]067; 11547010; 11625520; 11705033; 11605144
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Physical Review D
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Physical Review D Journal Volume: 97 Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 2470-0010
Publisher:
American Physical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS

Citation Formats

Wang, Sheng-Quan, Wu, Xing-Gang, Sang, Wen-Long, and Brodsky, Stanley J. Solution to the γ γ * → η c puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034.
Wang, Sheng-Quan, Wu, Xing-Gang, Sang, Wen-Long, & Brodsky, Stanley J. Solution to the γ γ * → η c puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034
Wang, Sheng-Quan, Wu, Xing-Gang, Sang, Wen-Long, and Brodsky, Stanley J. Thu . "Solution to the γ γ * → η c puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034.
@article{osti_1439733,
title = {Solution to the γ γ * → η c puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality},
author = {Wang, Sheng-Quan and Wu, Xing-Gang and Sang, Wen-Long and Brodsky, Stanley J.},
abstractNote = {Here, the next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) pQCD prediction for the γγ* → ηc form factor was evaluated in 2015 using nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD). A strong discrepancy between the NRQCD prediction and the BABAR measurements was observed. Until now there has been no solution for this puzzle. In this paper, we present a NNLO analysis by applying the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC) to set the renormalization scale. By carefully dealing with the light-by-light diagrams at the NNLO level, the resulting high precision PMC prediction agrees with the BABAR measurements within errors, and the conventional renormalization scale uncertainty is eliminated. The PMC is consistent with all of the requirements of the renormalization group, including scheme-independence. The application of the PMC thus provides a rigorous solution for the γγ* → ηc form factor puzzle, emphasizing the importance of correct renormalization scale-setting. The results also support the applicability of NRQCD to hard exclusive processes involving charmonium.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034},
journal = {Physical Review D},
number = 9,
volume = 97,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu May 31 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Thu May 31 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 9 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

FIG. 1 FIG. 1: The PMC scale of the NNLO TFF F (Q2) versus Q2. The conventional choice of scale µr = µQ is presented as a comparison.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

$ \mathcal{O}\left( {{\alpha_s}{v^2}} \right) $ correction to pseudoscalar quarkonium decay to two photons
journal, June 2011

  • Jia, Yu; Yang, Xiu-Ting; Sang, Wen-Long
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2011, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2011)097

RunDec: a Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses
journal, December 2000


Renormalons
journal, August 1999


Self-consistency requirements of the renormalization group for setting the renormalization scale
journal, September 2012


Can Nonrelativistic QCD Explain the γ γ * η c Transition Form Factor Data?
journal, November 2015


Partonic structure of neutral pseudoscalars via two photon transition form factors
journal, April 2017


Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium
journal, February 1995

  • Bodwin, Geoffrey T.; Braaten, Eric; Lepage, G. Peter
  • Physical Review D, Vol. 51, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1125

Importance of proper renormalization scale-setting for QCD testing at colliders
journal, December 2015


Light-front holographic QCD and emerging confinement
journal, July 2015


Higher order corrections to the cross section of e + e quarkonium + γ
journal, February 2010


The renormalization scale-setting problem in QCD
journal, September 2013

  • Wu, Xing-Gang; Brodsky, Stanley J.; Mojaza, Matin
  • Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 72
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.06.001

Renormalization group invariance and optimal QCD renormalization scale-setting: a key issues review
journal, October 2015


Erratum: Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium [Phys. Rev. D 51 , 1125 (1995)]
journal, May 1997

  • Bodwin, Geoffrey T.; Braaten, Eric; Lepage, G. Peter
  • Physical Review D, Vol. 55, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5853

Measurement of the γ γ * η c transition form factor
journal, March 2010


On the elimination of scale ambiguities in perturbative quantum chromodynamics
journal, July 1983

  • Brodsky, Stanley J.; Lepage, G. Peter; Mackenzie, Paul B.
  • Physical Review D, Vol. 28, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.228

Novel all-orders single-scale approach to QCD renormalization scale-setting
journal, May 2017


O ( α s v 2 ) corrections to hadronic and electromagnetic decays of S 0 1 heavy quarkonium
journal, June 2011


Quantum Electrodynamics at Small Distances
journal, September 1954


Aspects of SU(Nc) gauge theories in the limit of small number of colors
journal, January 1998


Works referencing / citing this record:

γ * γ * η c ( 1 S , 2 S ) transition form factors for spacelike photons
journal, September 2019


Extending the predictive power of perturbative QCD
journal, February 2019


Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.