DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Does Plant Biomass Manipulation in Static Chambers Affect Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils?

Abstract

One of the most widespread approaches for measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from soils involves the use of static chambers. This method is relatively inexpensive, is easily replicated, and is ideally suited to plot-based experimental systems. Among its limitations is the loss of detection sensitivity with increasing chamber height, which creates challenges for deployment in systems including tall vegetation. It is not always possible to avoid inclusion of plants within chambers or to extend chamber height to fully accommodate plant growth. Thus, in many systems, such as perennial forages and biomass crops, plants growing within static chambers must either be trimmed or folded during lid closure. Currently, data on how different types of biomass manipulation affect measured results is limited. For this study, we compare the effects of cutting vs. folding of biomass on nitrous oxide measurements in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) systems. We report only limited evidence of treatment effects during discrete sampling events and little basis for concern that effects may intensify over time as biomass manipulation is repeatedly imposed. However, nonsignificant treatment effects that were consistently present amounted to significant overall trends in three out of the four systems studied. Such minormore » disparities in flux could amount to considerable quantities over time, suggesting that caution should be exercised when comparing cumulative emission values from studies using different biomass manipulation strategies.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [3]
  1. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Office of Sustainability and Dept. of Soil Science
  2. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC)
  3. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC) and Dept. of Agronomy
  4. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Dept. of Soil Science
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); National Science Foundation (NSF); US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)
OSTI Identifier:
1438265
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1418643
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC02-07ER64494; 1215858; 2013-68002-20525; AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Environmental Quality
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 45; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0047-2425
Publisher:
American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Collier, Sarah M., Dean, Andrew P., Oates, Lawrence G., Ruark, Matthew D., and Jackson, Randall D. Does Plant Biomass Manipulation in Static Chambers Affect Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils?. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.2134/jeq2015.07.0377.
Collier, Sarah M., Dean, Andrew P., Oates, Lawrence G., Ruark, Matthew D., & Jackson, Randall D. Does Plant Biomass Manipulation in Static Chambers Affect Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils?. United States. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.07.0377
Collier, Sarah M., Dean, Andrew P., Oates, Lawrence G., Ruark, Matthew D., and Jackson, Randall D. Fri . "Does Plant Biomass Manipulation in Static Chambers Affect Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils?". United States. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.07.0377. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1438265.
@article{osti_1438265,
title = {Does Plant Biomass Manipulation in Static Chambers Affect Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils?},
author = {Collier, Sarah M. and Dean, Andrew P. and Oates, Lawrence G. and Ruark, Matthew D. and Jackson, Randall D.},
abstractNote = {One of the most widespread approaches for measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from soils involves the use of static chambers. This method is relatively inexpensive, is easily replicated, and is ideally suited to plot-based experimental systems. Among its limitations is the loss of detection sensitivity with increasing chamber height, which creates challenges for deployment in systems including tall vegetation. It is not always possible to avoid inclusion of plants within chambers or to extend chamber height to fully accommodate plant growth. Thus, in many systems, such as perennial forages and biomass crops, plants growing within static chambers must either be trimmed or folded during lid closure. Currently, data on how different types of biomass manipulation affect measured results is limited. For this study, we compare the effects of cutting vs. folding of biomass on nitrous oxide measurements in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) systems. We report only limited evidence of treatment effects during discrete sampling events and little basis for concern that effects may intensify over time as biomass manipulation is repeatedly imposed. However, nonsignificant treatment effects that were consistently present amounted to significant overall trends in three out of the four systems studied. Such minor disparities in flux could amount to considerable quantities over time, suggesting that caution should be exercised when comparing cumulative emission values from studies using different biomass manipulation strategies.},
doi = {10.2134/jeq2015.07.0377},
journal = {Journal of Environmental Quality},
number = 2,
volume = 45,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jan 22 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Fri Jan 22 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 8 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Nitrous Oxide Emission through Plants
journal, January 1998


Emission of N 2 O from rye grass ( Lolium perenne L.)
journal, February 1999

  • Chen, X.; Boeckx, P.; Shen, S.
  • Biology and Fertility of Soils, Vol. 28, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s003740050510

Defoliation induces root exudation and triggers positive rhizospheric feedbacks in a temperate grassland
journal, November 2008


Roots, Nitrogen Transformations, and Ecosystem Services
journal, June 2008


Nitrous oxide emissions from cool-season pastures under managed grazing
journal, February 2015

  • Jackson, Randall D.; Oates, Lawrence G.; Schacht, Walter H.
  • Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, Vol. 101, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10705-015-9685-6

A comprehensive approach to soil-atmosphere trace-gas flux estimation with static chambers
journal, September 2010


Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions
journal, May 2012

  • Reay, Dave S.; Davidson, Eric A.; Smith, Keith A.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1458

Chamber Measurements of Soil Nitrous Oxide Flux: Are Absolute Values Reliable?
journal, March 2008

  • Rochette, Philippe; Eriksen-Hamel, Nikita S.
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 72, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0215

Soil carbon lost from Mollisols of the North Central U.S.A. with 20 years of agricultural best management practices
journal, November 2012

  • Sanford, Gregg R.; Posner, Joshua L.; Jackson, Randall D.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 162
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.011

Wheat leaves emit nitrous oxide during nitrate assimilation
journal, June 2001

  • Smart, D. R.; Bloom, A. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 98, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.131572798

Accuracy and Precision Analysis of Chamber-Based Nitrous Oxide Gas Flux Estimates
journal, July 2009

  • Venterea, Rodney T.; Spokas, Kurt A.; Baker, John M.
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 73, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0307

Regression Models for Calculating Gas Fluxes Measured with a Closed Chamber
journal, January 1997


Works referencing / citing this record:

Surface and subsurface N2O losses from dairy cropping systems
journal, June 2019

  • Quesnel, Jessica; VanderZaag, Andrew C.; Crolla, Anna
  • Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, Vol. 114, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10705-019-10004-5

Cover Crop Effects on Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance in Grain and Silage Maize
journal, January 2019