# Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER

## Abstract

The transfer of the plasma current from thermal to relativistic electrons is a threat to ITER achieving its mission. This danger is significantly greater in the nuclear than in the non-nuclear phase of ITER operations. Two issues are pivotal. The first is the extent and duration of magnetic surface breaking in conjunction with the thermal quenches. The second is the exponential sensitivity of the current transfer to three quantities: (1) the poloidal flux change required to e-fold the number of relativistic electrons, (2) the time $$\tau_a$$ after the beginning of the thermal quench before the accelerating electric field exceeds the Connor-Hastie field for runaway, and (3) the duration of the period $$\tau_{\rm op}$$ in which magnetic surfaces remain open. Adequate knowledge does not exist to devise a reliable strategy for the protection of ITER. Uncertainties are sufficiently large that a transfer of neither a negligible nor the full plasma current to relativistic electrons can be ruled out during the non-nuclear phase of ITER. Tritium decay can provide a sufficiently strong seed for a dangerous relativistic-electron current even if $$\tau_a$$ and $$\tau_{\rm op}$$ are sufficiently long to avoid relativistic electrons during non-nuclear operations. The breakup of magnetic surfaces that is associated with thermal quenches occurs on a time scale associated with fast magnetic reconnection, which means reconnection at an Alfvénic rather than a resistive rate. Alfvénic reconnection is well beyond the capabilities of existing computational tools for tokamaks, but its effects can be studied using its property of conserving magnetic helicity. Although the dangers to ITER from relativistic electrons have been known for twenty years, the critical issues have not been defined with sufficient precision to formulate an effective research program. Studies are particularly needed on plasma behavior in existing tokamaks during thermal quenches, behavior which could be clarified using methods developed here.

- Authors:

- Publication Date:

- Research Org.:
- Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)

- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)

- OSTI Identifier:
- 1437785

- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1501914

- Grant/Contract Number:
- FG02-03ER54696; SC0016347

- Resource Type:
- Published Article

- Journal Name:
- Nuclear Fusion

- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: Nuclear Fusion Journal Volume: 58 Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5515

- Publisher:
- IOP Science

- Country of Publication:
- IAEA

- Language:
- English

- Subject:
- 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; runaway electrons; thermal quench; current spike; tokamak disruptions

### Citation Formats

```
Boozer, Allen H. Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER. IAEA: N. p., 2018.
Web. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aaa1db.
```

```
Boozer, Allen H. Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER. IAEA. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aaa1db
```

```
Boozer, Allen H. Mon .
"Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER". IAEA. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aaa1db.
```

```
@article{osti_1437785,
```

title = {Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER},

author = {Boozer, Allen H.},

abstractNote = {The transfer of the plasma current from thermal to relativistic electrons is a threat to ITER achieving its mission. This danger is significantly greater in the nuclear than in the non-nuclear phase of ITER operations. Two issues are pivotal. The first is the extent and duration of magnetic surface breaking in conjunction with the thermal quenches. The second is the exponential sensitivity of the current transfer to three quantities: (1) the poloidal flux change required to e-fold the number of relativistic electrons, (2) the time $\tau_a$ after the beginning of the thermal quench before the accelerating electric field exceeds the Connor-Hastie field for runaway, and (3) the duration of the period $\tau_{\rm op}$ in which magnetic surfaces remain open. Adequate knowledge does not exist to devise a reliable strategy for the protection of ITER. Uncertainties are sufficiently large that a transfer of neither a negligible nor the full plasma current to relativistic electrons can be ruled out during the non-nuclear phase of ITER. Tritium decay can provide a sufficiently strong seed for a dangerous relativistic-electron current even if $\tau_a$ and $\tau_{\rm op}$ are sufficiently long to avoid relativistic electrons during non-nuclear operations. The breakup of magnetic surfaces that is associated with thermal quenches occurs on a time scale associated with fast magnetic reconnection, which means reconnection at an Alfvénic rather than a resistive rate. Alfvénic reconnection is well beyond the capabilities of existing computational tools for tokamaks, but its effects can be studied using its property of conserving magnetic helicity. Although the dangers to ITER from relativistic electrons have been known for twenty years, the critical issues have not been defined with sufficient precision to formulate an effective research program. Studies are particularly needed on plasma behavior in existing tokamaks during thermal quenches, behavior which could be clarified using methods developed here.},

doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/aaa1db},

journal = {Nuclear Fusion},

number = 3,

volume = 58,

place = {IAEA},

year = {2018},

month = {1}

}

https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aaa1db

*Citation information provided by*

Web of Science

Web of Science

Works referenced in this record:

##
Loss of relativistic electrons when magnetic surfaces are broken

journal, October 2016

- Boozer, Allen H.; Punjabi, Alkesh
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 10

##
Three-dimensional non-linear magnetohydrodynamic modeling of massive gas injection triggered disruptions in JET

journal, June 2015

- Fil, A.; Nardon, E.; Hoelzl, M.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 22, Issue 6

##
Runaway acceleration during magnetic reconnection in tokamaks

journal, November 2002

- Helander, P.; Eriksson, L-G; Andersson, F.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 44, Issue 12B

##
Thirty years of turnstiles and transport

journal, September 2015

- Meiss, J. D.
- Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Vol. 25, Issue 9

##
Nonlinear growth of the tearing mode

journal, January 1973

- Rutherford, P. H.
- Physics of Fluids, Vol. 16, Issue 11

##
Magnetic reconnection: from the Sweet–Parker model to stochastic plasmoid chains

journal, November 2015

- Loureiro, N. F.; Uzdensky, D. A.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 58, Issue 1

##
Non-axisymmetric magnetic fields and toroidal plasma confinement

journal, January 2015

- Boozer, Allen H.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 55, Issue 2

##
Relativistic limitations on runaway electrons

journal, June 1975

- Connor, J. W.; Hastie, R. J.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 15, Issue 3

##
Scaling of the MHD perturbation amplitude required to trigger a disruption and predictions for ITER

journal, December 2015

- de Vries, P. C.; Pautasso, G.; Nardon, E.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 56, Issue 2

##
Efficiency of current drive by fast waves

journal, January 1985

- Karney, Charles F. F.; Fisch, Nathaniel J.
- Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28, Issue 1

##
On the value of the reconnection rate

journal, November 2016

- Comisso, L.; Bhattacharjee, A.
- Journal of Plasma Physics, Vol. 82, Issue 6

##
Perspectives on magnetic reconnection

journal, December 2016

- Zweibel, Ellen G.; Yamada, Masaaki
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 472, Issue 2196

##
Collisional avalanche exponentiation of runaway electrons in electrified plasmas

journal, January 1993

- Jayakumar, R.; Fleischmann, H. H.; Zweben, S. J.
- Physics Letters A, Vol. 172, Issue 6

##
Passive runaway electron suppression in tokamak disruptions

journal, July 2013

- Smith, H. M.; Boozer, A. H.; Helander, P.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 20, Issue 7

##
Generation of runaway electrons during the thermal quench in tokamaks

journal, February 2017

- Aleynikov, Pavel; Breizman, Boris N.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 57, Issue 4

##
Ohm's law for mean magnetic fields

journal, February 1986

- Boozer, A. H.
- Journal of Plasma Physics, Vol. 35, Issue 1

##
Model of magnetic reconnection in space and astrophysical plasmas

journal, March 2013

- Boozer, Allen H.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 20, Issue 3

##
Transport in Hamiltonian systems

journal, August 1984

- Mackay, R. S.; Meiss, J. D.; Percival, I. C.
- Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Vol. 13, Issue 1-2

##
Hot tail runaway electron generation in tokamak disruptions

journal, July 2008

- Smith, H. M.; Verwichte, E.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 15, Issue 7

##
Theory of runaway electrons in ITER: Equations, important parameters, and implications for mitigation

journal, March 2015

- Boozer, Allen H.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 22, Issue 3

##
Some properties of the M3D-C1 form of the three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics equations

journal, September 2009

- Breslau, J.; Ferraro, N.; Jardin, S.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 16, Issue 9

##
Formation of current sheets in magnetic reconnection

journal, July 2014

- Boozer, Allen H.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 7

##
Theory for avalanche of runaway electrons in tokamaks

journal, October 1997

- Rosenbluth, M. N.; Putvinski, S. V.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 37, Issue 10

##
Stopping power and range of energetic electrons in dense plasmas of fast-ignition fusion targets

journal, January 2008

- Solodov, A. A.; Betti, R.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 15, Issue 4

##
Modeling of rapid shutdown in the DIII-D tokamak by core deposition of high-Z material

journal, June 2017

- Izzo, V. A.; Parks, P. B.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 24, Issue 6

##
Rigorous new limits on magnetic helicity dissipation in the solar corona

journal, September 1984

- Berger, Mitchell A.
- Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 30, Issue 1-2

##
Progress in understanding disruptions triggered by massive gas injection via 3D non-linear MHD modelling with JOREK

journal, October 2016

- Nardon, E.; Fil, A.; Hoelzl, M.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 59, Issue 1

##
A Theorem on Force-Free Magnetic Fields

journal, June 1958

- Woltjer, L.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 44, Issue 6

##
Runaway electrons and magnetic island confinement

journal, August 2016

- Boozer, Allen H.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 8

##
Runaway electrons and the evolution of the plasma current in tokamak disruptions

journal, October 2006

- Smith, H.; Helander, P.; Eriksson, L. -G.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 13, Issue 10

##
Two beneficial non-axisymmetric perturbations to tokamaks

journal, May 2011

- Boozer, Allen H.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 53, Issue 8

##
Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions

journal, June 2007

- Hender, T. C.; Wesley, J. C.; Bialek, J.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 47, Issue 6