skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison Evaluations of VRF and RTU Systems Performance on Flexible Research Platform

Abstract

The energy performance of a variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system was evaluated using an occupancy-emulated research building in the southeastern region of the United States. Full- and part-load performance of the VRF system in heating and cooling seasons was compared with a conventional rooftop unit (RTU) variable-air-volume system with electric resistance heating. During both the heating and cooling seasons, full- and part-load conditions (i.e., 100%, 75%, and 50% thermal loads) were maintained alternately for 2 to 3 days each, and the energy use, thermal conditions, and coefficient of performance (COP) for the RTU and VRF system were measured. During the cooling season, the VRF system had an average COP of 4.2, 3.9, and 3.7 compared with 3.1, 3.0, and 2.5 for the RTU system under 100%, 75%, and 50% load conditions and resulted in estimated energy savings of 30%, 37%, and 47%, respectively. Finally, during the heating season, the VRF system had an average COP ranging from 1.2 to 2.0, substantially higher than the COPs of the RTU system, and resulted in estimated energy savings of 51%, 47%, and 27% under the three load conditions, respectively.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [2];  [2];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4]
  1. Samsung Electronics, Suwon (Korea, Republic of). Dept. of Digital Appliances R&D Team
  2. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Building Technologies Research and Integration Center (BTRIC)
  3. National Univ., Jinju (Korea, Republic of). Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Graduate School of Gyeongsang
  4. Gyeongsang National Univ., Jinju (Korea, Republic of). Dept. of Architectural Engineering, ERI
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1432140
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Advances in Civil Engineering
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 2018; Journal ID: ISSN 1687-8086
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING

Citation Formats

Lee, Je-hyeon, Im, Piljae, Munk, Jeffrey D., Malhotra, Mini, Kim, Min-seok, and Song, Young-hak. Comparison Evaluations of VRF and RTU Systems Performance on Flexible Research Platform. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1155/2018/7867128.
Lee, Je-hyeon, Im, Piljae, Munk, Jeffrey D., Malhotra, Mini, Kim, Min-seok, & Song, Young-hak. Comparison Evaluations of VRF and RTU Systems Performance on Flexible Research Platform. United States. doi:10.1155/2018/7867128.
Lee, Je-hyeon, Im, Piljae, Munk, Jeffrey D., Malhotra, Mini, Kim, Min-seok, and Song, Young-hak. Thu . "Comparison Evaluations of VRF and RTU Systems Performance on Flexible Research Platform". United States. doi:10.1155/2018/7867128. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1432140.
@article{osti_1432140,
title = {Comparison Evaluations of VRF and RTU Systems Performance on Flexible Research Platform},
author = {Lee, Je-hyeon and Im, Piljae and Munk, Jeffrey D. and Malhotra, Mini and Kim, Min-seok and Song, Young-hak},
abstractNote = {The energy performance of a variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system was evaluated using an occupancy-emulated research building in the southeastern region of the United States. Full- and part-load performance of the VRF system in heating and cooling seasons was compared with a conventional rooftop unit (RTU) variable-air-volume system with electric resistance heating. During both the heating and cooling seasons, full- and part-load conditions (i.e., 100%, 75%, and 50% thermal loads) were maintained alternately for 2 to 3 days each, and the energy use, thermal conditions, and coefficient of performance (COP) for the RTU and VRF system were measured. During the cooling season, the VRF system had an average COP of 4.2, 3.9, and 3.7 compared with 3.1, 3.0, and 2.5 for the RTU system under 100%, 75%, and 50% load conditions and resulted in estimated energy savings of 30%, 37%, and 47%, respectively. Finally, during the heating season, the VRF system had an average COP ranging from 1.2 to 2.0, substantially higher than the COPs of the RTU system, and resulted in estimated energy savings of 51%, 47%, and 27% under the three load conditions, respectively.},
doi = {10.1155/2018/7867128},
journal = {Advances in Civil Engineering},
number = ,
volume = 2018,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {4}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Simulation comparison of VAV and VRF air conditioning systems in an existing building for the cooling season
journal, November 2009