DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with the Lowest Self-Discharge and the Longest Shelf life

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are promising as a next-generation energy-storage device because their energy density is higher than that of current Li-ion technology. However, in comparison to Li-ion batteries, Li–S batteries encounter much faster self-discharge and shorter shelf life. Unfortunately, the lack of literature against the realities of severe self-discharge makes developing a practically viable Li–S technology a daunting challenge. We present here low self-discharge (LSD) Li–S batteries that have the lowest self-discharge constant of 0.0022 per day and the longest shelf life of one year. The superior electrochemical stability of the LSD Li–S batteries is reflected in a low capacity-fade rate of only 0.14% per day over the extended experimental time period. In addition, an analysis of the Li–S articles investigating the self-discharge effect in the literature reveals that the LSD Li–S batteries presented here offer a greater than 12-fold improvement in the cell shelf life with good cycling stability.

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States). Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Inst.
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1429338
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1430180; OSTI ID: 1487459
Grant/Contract Number:  
EE0007218
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
ACS Energy Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 2; Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 2380-8195
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
25 ENERGY STORAGE; 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE

Citation Formats

Chung, Sheng-Heng, and Manthiram, Arumugam. Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with the Lowest Self-Discharge and the Longest Shelf life. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00245.
Chung, Sheng-Heng, & Manthiram, Arumugam. Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with the Lowest Self-Discharge and the Longest Shelf life. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00245
Chung, Sheng-Heng, and Manthiram, Arumugam. Wed . "Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with the Lowest Self-Discharge and the Longest Shelf life". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00245. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1429338.
@article{osti_1429338,
title = {Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with the Lowest Self-Discharge and the Longest Shelf life},
author = {Chung, Sheng-Heng and Manthiram, Arumugam},
abstractNote = {Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are promising as a next-generation energy-storage device because their energy density is higher than that of current Li-ion technology. However, in comparison to Li-ion batteries, Li–S batteries encounter much faster self-discharge and shorter shelf life. Unfortunately, the lack of literature against the realities of severe self-discharge makes developing a practically viable Li–S technology a daunting challenge. We present here low self-discharge (LSD) Li–S batteries that have the lowest self-discharge constant of 0.0022 per day and the longest shelf life of one year. The superior electrochemical stability of the LSD Li–S batteries is reflected in a low capacity-fade rate of only 0.14% per day over the extended experimental time period. In addition, an analysis of the Li–S articles investigating the self-discharge effect in the literature reveals that the LSD Li–S batteries presented here offer a greater than 12-fold improvement in the cell shelf life with good cycling stability.},
doi = {10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00245},
journal = {ACS Energy Letters},
number = 5,
volume = 2,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 12 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Wed Apr 12 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 50 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Li-ion battery materials: present and future
journal, June 2015


Progress Towards Commercially Viable Li-S Battery Cells
journal, April 2015

  • Urbonaite, Sigita; Poux, Tiphaine; Novák, Petr
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500118

Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects
journal, February 2015

  • Manthiram, Arumugam; Chung, Sheng-Heng; Zu, Chenxi
  • Advanced Materials, Vol. 27, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/adma.201405115

Improved performance of lithium–sulfur battery with fluorinated electrolyte
journal, December 2013


The Li–S battery: an investigation of redox shuttle and self-discharge behaviour with LiNO 3 -containing electrolytes
journal, January 2016

  • Lacey, Matthew J.; Yalamanchili, Anurag; Maibach, Julia
  • RSC Advances, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1039/C5RA23635E

Self-discharge of lithium–sulfur cells using stainless-steel current-collectors
journal, February 2005


Self-discharge characteristics of lithium/sulfur batteries using TEGDME liquid electrolyte
journal, December 2006


Lithium/Sulfur Batteries Upon Cycling: Structural Modifications and Species Quantification by In Situ and Operando X-Ray Diffraction Spectroscopy
journal, May 2015

  • Waluś, Sylwia; Barchasz, Céline; Bouchet, Renaud
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500165

Bifunctional Separator with a Light-Weight Carbon-Coating for Dynamically and Statically Stable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, June 2014

  • Chung, Sheng-Heng; Manthiram, Arumugam
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 24, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201400845

A core–shell electrode for dynamically and statically stable Li–S battery chemistry
journal, January 2016

  • Chung, Sheng-Heng; Chang, Chi-Hao; Manthiram, Arumugam
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 9, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1039/C6EE01280A

Investigation of the Self-Discharge Behavior of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, January 2016

  • Knap, V.; Stroe, D. -I.; Swierczynski, M.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 163, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0641606jes

A simple, experiment-based model of the initial self-discharge of lithium-sulphur batteries
journal, February 2016


Vapor-grown carbon fiber anode for cylindrical lithium ion rechargeable batteries
journal, February 1999


Multi-functional separator/interlayer system for high-stable lithium-sulfur batteries: Progress and prospects
journal, November 2015


Permselective Graphene Oxide Membrane for Highly Stable and Anti-Self-Discharge Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
journal, February 2015

  • Huang, Jia-Qi; Zhuang, Ting-Zhou; Zhang, Qiang
  • ACS Nano, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/nn507178a

Electrochemically Stable Rechargeable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with a Microporous Carbon Nanofiber Filter for Polysulfide
journal, July 2015

  • Chung, Sheng-Heng; Han, Pauline; Singhal, Richa
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500738

Structural Factors of Sulfur Cathodes with Poly(ethylene oxide) Binder for Performance of Rechargeable Lithium Sulfur Batteries
journal, January 2002

  • Cheon, Sang-Eun; Cho, Ji-Hoon; Ko, Ki-Seok
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 149, Issue 11, p. A1437-A1441
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1511187

Rechargeable Lithium Sulfur Battery
journal, January 2003

  • Cheon, Sang-Eun; Ko, Ki-Seok; Cho, Ji-Hoon
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 150, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1571532

Functional Mesoporous Carbon-Coated Separator for Long-Life, High-Energy Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, July 2015

  • Balach, Juan; Jaumann, Tony; Klose, Markus
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 25, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201502251

Ionic shield for polysulfides towards highly-stable lithium–sulfur batteries
journal, January 2014

  • Huang, Jia-Qi; Zhang, Qiang; Peng, Hong-Jie
  • Energy Environ. Sci., Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1039/C3EE42223B

A Polyethylene Glycol-Supported Microporous Carbon Coating as a Polysulfide Trap for Utilizing Pure Sulfur Cathodes in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, September 2014


Composite Cathodes Containing SWCNT@S Coaxial Nanocables: Facile Synthesis, Surface Modification, and Enhanced Performance for Li-Ion Storage
journal, February 2013

  • Zhang, Shu-Mao; Zhang, Qiang; Huang, Jia-Qi
  • Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, Vol. 30, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201200082

A dual coaxial nanocable sulfur composite for high-rate lithium–sulfur batteries
journal, January 2014


A hierarchical carbonized paper with controllable thickness as a modulable interlayer system for high performance Li–S batteries
journal, January 2014

  • Chung, Sheng-Heng; Manthiram, Arumugam
  • Chemical Communications, Vol. 50, Issue 32
  • DOI: 10.1039/c4cc00850b

A layer-by-layer supramolecular structure for a sulfur cathode
journal, January 2016

  • Bucur, Claudiu B.; Muldoon, John; Lita, Adrian
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/C5EE02367J

Mechanistic modeling of polysulfide shuttle and capacity loss in lithium–sulfur batteries
journal, August 2014


Direct Measurement of Polysulfide Shuttle Current: A Window into Understanding the Performance of Lithium-Sulfur Cells
journal, November 2014

  • Moy, Derek; Manivannan, A.; Narayanan, S. R.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 162, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0181501jes

Polysulfide Shuttle Study in the Li/S Battery System
journal, January 2004

  • Mikhaylik, Yuriy V.; Akridge, James R.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 151, Issue 11, p. A1969-A1976
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1806394

Critical Link between Materials Chemistry and Cell-Level Design for High Energy Density and Low Cost Lithium-Sulfur Transportation Battery
journal, January 2015

  • Eroglu, Damla; Zavadil, Kevin R.; Gallagher, Kevin G.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 162, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0611506jes

Operando Characterization of Intermediates Produced in a Lithium-Sulfur Battery
journal, January 2015

  • Gorlin, Yelena; Siebel, Armin; Piana, Michele
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 162, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0081507jes

3D Carbonaceous Current Collectors: The Origin of Enhanced Cycling Stability for High-Sulfur-Loading Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, June 2016

  • Peng, Hong-Jie; Xu, Wen-Tao; Zhu, Lin
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 26, Issue 35
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201602071

Works referencing / citing this record:

Self-Discharge Behavior of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries at Different Electrolyte/Sulfur Ratios
journal, January 2019

  • Shen, Chao; Xie, Jianxin; Zhang, Mei
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 166, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1149/2.0461903jes

Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable
journal, May 2018

  • Chung, Sheng-Heng; Chang, Chi-Hao; Manthiram, Arumugam
  • Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 28, Issue 28
  • DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201801188

Nanostructured Host Materials for Trapping Sulfur in Rechargeable Li-S Batteries: Structure Design and Interfacial Chemistry
journal, November 2017


Rational design of two-dimensional nanomaterials for lithium–sulfur batteries
journal, January 2020

  • Jana, Milan; Xu, Rui; Cheng, Xin-Bing
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9ee02049g

Electrostatic trapping of polysulfides enabled by imidazolium-based ionic polymers for high-energy-density lithium–sulfur batteries
journal, January 2018

  • Cheng, Zhibin; Pan, Hui; Xiao, Zhubing
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Vol. 6, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8ta01298a

On the Factors Affecting Aging and Self‐Discharge of Lithium–Sulfur Cells. Effect of Positive Electrode Composition
journal, May 2019

  • Kuzmina, Elena; Karaseva, Elena; Ivanov, Alexey
  • Energy Technology, Vol. 7, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/ente.201900134

Rational Design of Statically and Dynamically Stable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with High Sulfur Loading and Low Electrolyte/Sulfur Ratio
journal, December 2017


Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
journal, May 2019