skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Desert camouflage and what wildlife see

Abstract

Desert, desert-scrub, savanna and sandy beach and lakeshore environments can be particularly tricky in terms of camouflage selection due to their low vegetative density. Therefore many companies focus on the development of paint color schemes that match the vegetation and the desert soils/sands. However another factor in the consideration of which camouflage to purchase may lie in what the animal can see. White-tailed deer and similar large mammals have been shown to have three classes of photo pigments that are sensitive to the range of blue to yellowgreen during day light hours and blue to blue-green at night. Six commercially-available camouflage patterns were investigated to determine if the reflectance characteristics measured in the laboratory and under field conditions were elevated in the blue range and perhaps more likely to be seen by wildlife. The camouflage patterns were evaluated against standard vegetation indices including NDVI, SAVI, EVI, and SR. Only two of the patterns (S4 and S5) possessed a reflectance more like vegetation. Patterns S4, S6, S3, and S2 all showed only slight elevations in the blue wavelength range which could only have been detected by NIR measurements instead of visual observation by the human eye.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1427458
Report Number(s):
SRNL-STI-2017-00750
Journal ID: ISSN 0960-3360; TRN: US1802717
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC09-08SR22470
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
NIR news
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 28; Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 0960-3360
Publisher:
SAGE
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; camouflage; desert; blue wavelength; animals; NIR

Citation Formats

Kuhne, Wendy W., Duff, Martine C., Salvaggio, Katie, Halverson, Nancy V., and Staggs, Ronald. Desert camouflage and what wildlife see. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1177/0960336017738177.
Kuhne, Wendy W., Duff, Martine C., Salvaggio, Katie, Halverson, Nancy V., & Staggs, Ronald. Desert camouflage and what wildlife see. United States. doi:10.1177/0960336017738177.
Kuhne, Wendy W., Duff, Martine C., Salvaggio, Katie, Halverson, Nancy V., and Staggs, Ronald. Thu . "Desert camouflage and what wildlife see". United States. doi:10.1177/0960336017738177. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1427458.
@article{osti_1427458,
title = {Desert camouflage and what wildlife see},
author = {Kuhne, Wendy W. and Duff, Martine C. and Salvaggio, Katie and Halverson, Nancy V. and Staggs, Ronald},
abstractNote = {Desert, desert-scrub, savanna and sandy beach and lakeshore environments can be particularly tricky in terms of camouflage selection due to their low vegetative density. Therefore many companies focus on the development of paint color schemes that match the vegetation and the desert soils/sands. However another factor in the consideration of which camouflage to purchase may lie in what the animal can see. White-tailed deer and similar large mammals have been shown to have three classes of photo pigments that are sensitive to the range of blue to yellowgreen during day light hours and blue to blue-green at night. Six commercially-available camouflage patterns were investigated to determine if the reflectance characteristics measured in the laboratory and under field conditions were elevated in the blue range and perhaps more likely to be seen by wildlife. The camouflage patterns were evaluated against standard vegetation indices including NDVI, SAVI, EVI, and SR. Only two of the patterns (S4 and S5) possessed a reflectance more like vegetation. Patterns S4, S6, S3, and S2 all showed only slight elevations in the blue wavelength range which could only have been detected by NIR measurements instead of visual observation by the human eye.},
doi = {10.1177/0960336017738177},
journal = {NIR news},
number = 8,
volume = 28,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {10}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Electrophysiological measurements of spectral mechanisms in the retinas of two cervids: white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and fallow deer (Dama dama)
journal, May 1994

  • Jacobs, G. H.; Deegan, J. F.; Neitz, J.
  • Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Vol. 174, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00217375

A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)
journal, August 1988


Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation
journal, June 1970


Derivation of Leaf-Area Index from Quality of Light on the Forest Floor
journal, July 1969


A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS
journal, March 1997


Vegetation's Red Edge: A Possible Spectroscopic Biosignature of Extraterrestrial Plants
journal, June 2005


Eye evolution: Lens and cornea as an upgrade of animal visual system
journal, April 2008


Avian Vision: A Review of Form and Function with Special Consideration to Birds of Prey
journal, April 2007

  • Jones, Michael P.; Pierce, Kenneth E.; Ward, Daniel
  • Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, Vol. 16, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1053/j.jepm.2007.03.012

Evolution of colour vision in vertebrates
journal, May 1998


Reflectance of cotton leaves and their structure
journal, March 1969


Why do animal eyes have pupils of different shapes?
journal, August 2015

  • Banks, Martin S.; Sprague, William W.; Schmoll, Jürgen
  • Science Advances, Vol. 1, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500391

Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics
journal, February 2001

  • Slaton, Michèle R.; Raymond Hunt, E.; Smith, William K.
  • American Journal of Botany, Vol. 88, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2307/2657019