DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparing supply and demand models for future photovoltaic power generation in the USA

Abstract

Abstract We explore the plausible range of future deployment of photovoltaic generation capacity in the USA using a supply‐focused model based on supply‐chain growth constraints and a demand‐focused model based on minimizing the overall cost of the electricity system. Both approaches require assumptions based on previous experience and anticipated trends. For each of the models, we assign plausible ranges for the key assumptions and then compare the resulting PV deployment over time. Each model was applied to 2 different future scenarios: one in which PV market penetration is ultimately constrained by the uncontrolled variability of solar power and one in which low‐cost energy storage or some equivalent measure largely alleviates this constraint. The supply‐focused and demand‐focused models are in substantial agreement, not just in the long term, where deployment is largely determined by the assumed market penetration constraints, but also in the interim years. For the future scenario without low‐cost energy storage or equivalent measures, the 2 models give an average plausible range of PV generation capacity in the USA of 150 to 530 GW dc in 2030 and 260 to 810 GW dc in 2040. With low‐cost energy storage or equivalent measures, the corresponding ranges are 160 to 630more » GW dc in 2030 and 280 to 1200 GW dc in 2040. The latter range is enough to supply 10% to 40% of US electricity demand in 2040, based on current demand growth.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]
  1. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington D.C. (United States)
  2. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Solar Energy Technologies Office
OSTI Identifier:
1426858
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1422237
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-6A20-68976
Journal ID: ISSN 1062-7995
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Progress in Photovoltaics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 26; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 1062-7995
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
14 SOLAR ENERGY; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; deployment; future; modeling; photovoltaics

Citation Formats

Basore, Paul A., and Cole, Wesley J. Comparing supply and demand models for future photovoltaic power generation in the USA. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/pip.2997.
Basore, Paul A., & Cole, Wesley J. Comparing supply and demand models for future photovoltaic power generation in the USA. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2997
Basore, Paul A., and Cole, Wesley J. Thu . "Comparing supply and demand models for future photovoltaic power generation in the USA". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2997. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1426858.
@article{osti_1426858,
title = {Comparing supply and demand models for future photovoltaic power generation in the USA},
author = {Basore, Paul A. and Cole, Wesley J.},
abstractNote = {Abstract We explore the plausible range of future deployment of photovoltaic generation capacity in the USA using a supply‐focused model based on supply‐chain growth constraints and a demand‐focused model based on minimizing the overall cost of the electricity system. Both approaches require assumptions based on previous experience and anticipated trends. For each of the models, we assign plausible ranges for the key assumptions and then compare the resulting PV deployment over time. Each model was applied to 2 different future scenarios: one in which PV market penetration is ultimately constrained by the uncontrolled variability of solar power and one in which low‐cost energy storage or some equivalent measure largely alleviates this constraint. The supply‐focused and demand‐focused models are in substantial agreement, not just in the long term, where deployment is largely determined by the assumed market penetration constraints, but also in the interim years. For the future scenario without low‐cost energy storage or equivalent measures, the 2 models give an average plausible range of PV generation capacity in the USA of 150 to 530 GW dc in 2030 and 260 to 810 GW dc in 2040. With low‐cost energy storage or equivalent measures, the corresponding ranges are 160 to 630 GW dc in 2030 and 280 to 1200 GW dc in 2040. The latter range is enough to supply 10% to 40% of US electricity demand in 2040, based on current demand growth.},
doi = {10.1002/pip.2997},
journal = {Progress in Photovoltaics},
number = 6,
volume = 26,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Feb 22 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Thu Feb 22 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Logic flow for comparing the plausible range of PV generation capacity in the USA calculated using a supply-focused model (left) and a demand-focused model (right). LCOE here represents the unsubsidized Levelized Cost of Electricity at the point of grid connection.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Trajectories and challenges
journal, April 2017


Paths to future growth in photovoltaics manufacturing: Paths to future growth in photovoltaics manufacturing
journal, March 2016

  • Basore, Paul A.
  • Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 24, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/pip.2761

Utility-scale lithium-ion storage cost projections for use in capacity expansion models
conference, September 2016

  • Cole, Wesley J.; Marcy, Cara; Krishnan, Venkat K.
  • 2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)
  • DOI: 10.1109/NAPS.2016.7747866