DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: On the light massive flavor dependence of the large order asymptotic behavior and the ambiguity of the pole mass

Journal Article · · Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Univ. of Vienna (Austria). Faculty of Physics; Erwin Schrödinger International Inst. for Mathematical Physics, Vienna (Austria); Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  2. Univ. of Vienna (Austria). Faculty of Physics
  3. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States). Center for Theoretical Physics; Univ. of Vienna (Austria). Faculty of Physics

Here, we provide a systematic renormalization group formalism for the mass effects in the relation of the pole mass m Qpole and short-distance masses such as the $$—\atop{MS}$$ mass $$—\atop{m}$$Q of a heavy quark Q, coming from virtual loop insertions of massive quarks lighter than Q. The formalism reflects the constraints from heavy quark symmetry and entails a combined matching and evolution procedure that allows to disentangle and successively integrate out the corrections coming from the lighter massive quarks and the momentum regions between them and to precisely control the large order asymptotic behavior. With the formalism we systematically sum logarithms of ratios of the lighter quark masses and m Q , relate the QCD corrections for different external heavy quarks to each other, predict the O(α$$4\atop{s}$$) virtual quark mass corrections in the pole-$$—\atop{MS}$$ mass relation, calculate the pole mass differences for the top, bottom and charm quarks with a precision of around 20 MeV and analyze the decoupling of the lighter massive quark flavors at large orders. The summation of logarithms is most relevant for the top quark pole mass m tpole, where the hierarchy to the bottom and charm quarks is large. We determine the ambiguity of the pole mass for top, bottom and charm quarks in different scenarios with massive or massless bottom and charm quarks in a way consistent with heavy quark symmetry, and we find that it is 250 MeV. The ambiguity is larger than current projections for the precision of top quark mass measurements in the high-luminosity phase of the LHC.

Research Organization:
Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP) (SC-25); Erwin Schrödinger International Inst. for Mathematical Physics, Vienna (Austria)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0011090
OSTI ID:
1424967
Journal Information:
Journal of High Energy Physics (Online), Journal Name: Journal of High Energy Physics (Online) Journal Issue: 9 Vol. 2017; ISSN 1029-8479
Publisher:
Springer BerlinCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (35)

A discussion on leading renormalon in the pole mass journal August 2017
The bottom quark mass from the ϒ 1 S $$ \boldsymbol{\Upsilon} (1S) $$ system at NNNLO journal September 2014
Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation journal November 1989
The pole mass in perturbative QCD journal June 1981
Resummation of (ß0αs)n corrections in QCD: techniques and applications to the τ hadronic width and the heavy quark pole mass journal October 1995
Renormalons journal August 1999
The three-loop relation between the and the pole quark masses journal June 2000
Charm effects in the bottom quark mass from ϒ mesons journal June 2000
A quark mass definition adequate for threshold problems journal August 1998
The relation between the and the on-shell quark mass at order αs3 journal May 2000
Relation between the pole and the minimally subtracted mass in dimensional regularization and dimensional reduction to three-loop order journal June 2007
Charm quark mass from inclusive semileptonic B decays journal February 2006
Measurement of the top quark mass in the t t ¯ → dilepton channel from s = 8  TeV ATLAS data journal October 2016
Taming the higher power corrections in semileptonic B decays journal December 2016
Determination of the bottom quark mass from the Υ(1 S ) system journal May 2001
Light quark mass effects in the on-shell renormalization constants journal October 2007
Review of Particle Physics journal October 2016
Pole mass of the heavy quark: Perturbation theory and beyond journal August 1994
Perturbative pole mass in QCD journal July 1998
Massive fermionic corrections to the heavy quark potential through two loops journal October 1998
B decays in the upsilon expansion journal March 1999
1 S and MS ¯ bottom quark masses from Υ sum rules journal December 1999
Fit to moments of inclusive B → X c ℓ ν ¯ and B → X s γ decay distributions using heavy quark expansions in the kinetic scheme journal April 2006
Measurement of the top quark mass using proton-proton data at ( s ) = 7 and 8 TeV journal April 2016
MS ¯ -on-shell quark mass relation up to four loops in QCD and a general SU ( N ) gauge group journal October 2016
Combination of D0 measurements of the top quark mass journal June 2017
Infrared Renormalization-Group Flow for Heavy-Quark Masses journal October 2008
Quark Mass Relations to Four-Loop Order in Perturbative QCD journal April 2015
Top Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators journal November 2016
Five-Loop Running of the QCD Coupling Constant journal February 2017
Non-Abelian Dipole Radiation and the Heavy Quark Expansion journal April 1998
B Decay and the ϒ Mass journal January 1999
Short-Distance Mass of a Heavy Quark at Order α s 3 journal November 1999
Strong-Coupling Constant with Flavor Thresholds at Five Loops in the Modified Minimal-Subtraction Scheme journal July 2006
On the flavour dependence of the $O(\alpha_{s}^{4})$ correction to the relation between running and pole heavy quark masses journal August 2016

Cited By (15)

Bottom and charm mass determinations from global fits to Q Q ¯ $$ Q\overline{Q} $$ bound states at N3LO journal January 2018
Top quark mass studies with t t ¯ j $$ t\overline{t}j $$ at the LHC journal March 2018
Fully-differential top-pair production at a lepton collider: from threshold to continuum journal March 2018
The MSR mass and the O Λ Q C D $$ \mathcal{O}\left({\Lambda}_{\mathrm{QCD}}\right) $$ renormalon sum rule journal April 2018
NLO and off-shell effects in top quark mass determinations journal July 2018
Top-quark physics at the CLIC electron-positron linear collider journal November 2019
Hyperasymptotic approximation to the top, bottom, and charm pole mass journal February 2020
Measurement of the top quark mass with lepton+jets final states using $$\mathrm {p}$$ p $$\mathrm {p}$$ p collisions at $$\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {TeV} $$ s = 13 TeV journal November 2018
Top-quark physics at the CLIC electron-positron linear collider text January 2019
Fully-differential Top-Pair Production at a Lepton Collider: From Threshold to Continuum text January 2017
Fully-differential top-pair production at a lepton collider: from threshold to continuum text January 2018
NLO and off-shell effects in top quark mass determinations text January 2017
Fully-differential Top-Pair Production at a Lepton Collider: From Threshold to Continuum text January 2017
Top-Quark Physics at the CLIC Electron-Positron Linear Collider text January 2018
Top-quark physics at the CLIC electron-positron linear collider text January 2019

Similar Records

Top Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators
Journal Article · 2016 · Physical Review Letters · OSTI ID:1424975

Corrections to chiral dynamics of heavy hadrons: SU(3) symmetry breaking
Journal Article · 1994 · Physical Review, D (Particles Fields); (United States) · OSTI ID:7308550

Measuring the running top-quark mass
Journal Article · 2009 · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields · OSTI ID:21322585