DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model

Abstract

Abstract To increase the understanding of poplar and willow perennial woody crops and facilitate their deployment for the production of biofuels, bioproducts, and bioenergy, there is a need for broadscale yield maps. For national analysis of woody and herbaceous crops production potential, biomass feedstock yield maps should be developed using a common framework. This study developed willow and poplar potential yield maps by combining data from a network of willow and poplar field trials and the modeling power of PRISM‐ELM. Yields of the top three willow cultivars across 17 sites ranged from 3.60 to 14.6 Mg ha −1  yr −1 dry weight, while the yields from 17 poplar trials ranged from 7.5 to 15.2 Mg ha −1  yr −1 . Relationships between the environmental suitability estimates from the PRISM‐ELM model and results from field trials had an R 2 of 0.60 for poplar and 0.81 for willow. The resulting potential yield maps reflected the range of poplar and willow yields that have been reported in the literature. Poplar covered a larger geographic range than willow, which likely reflects the poplar breeding efforts that have occurred for many more decades using genotypes from a broader range of environments than willow. While the field trial datamore » sets used to develop these models represent the most complete information at the time, there is a need to expand and improve the model by monitoring trials over multiple cutting cycles and across a broader range of environmental gradients. Despite some limitations, the results of these models represent a dramatic improvement in projections of potential yield of poplar and willow crops across the United States.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [1];  [2];  [6];  [7];  [1];  [8];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [9];  [10];  [1];  [2];  [11];  [1] more »;  [12]; ORCiD logo [8]; ORCiD logo [13];  [12];  [14];  [15] « less
  1. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry 1 Forestry Dr Syracuse NY 13210 USA
  2. Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota‐Duluth 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth MN 5581 USA
  3. Northwest Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering PRISM Climate Group Oregon State University 2000 Kelley Engineering Center Corvallis OR USA
  4. Forest Biomass Innovation Center Michigan State University 6001 J Road Escanaba MI 49829 USA
  5. Center for Renewable Carbon The University of Tennessee 2506 Jacob Drive Knoxville TN 37996 USA
  6. Forest Service Research and Development USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave. Washington DC 20250‐003 USA
  7. ArborGen 2011 Broadbank Court Ridgeville SC 29472 USA
  8. Horticulture Section School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University Geneva NY 14456 USA
  9. Southern Outreach and Extension Center University of Minnesota 35838 120th St. Waseca MN 56093 USA
  10. Department of Plant Science University of Connecticut 1376 Storrs Rd Storrs CY 06269‐4067 USA
  11. Department of Forestry Mississippi State University 775 Stone Blvd. Mississippi MS 39762 USA
  12. GreenWood Resources 1500 SW 1st Avenue Portland OR 97201 USA
  13. Department of Forestry and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin‐Madison 391a Russell Laboratories, 1630 Linden Dr. Madison WI 53706 USA
  14. Allegheny Science &, Technology 125 Professional Place Bridgeport WV 26330 USA
  15. Durania LLC 364 Wood Haven Trail Boone NC 28607 USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office
OSTI Identifier:
1422015
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1422016; OSTI ID: 1613532
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐FC36‐05GO85041; FC36-05GO85041
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Volume: 10 Journal Issue: 10; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS

Citation Formats

Volk, Timothy A., Berguson, Bill, Daly, Christopher, Halbleib, Michael D., Miller, Raymond, Rials, Timothy G., Abrahamson, Lawrence P., Buchman, Dan, Buford, Marylin, Cunningham, Michael W., Eisenbies, Mark, Fabio, Eric S., Hallen, Karl, Heavey, Justin, Johnson, Gregg A., Kuzovkina, Yulia A., Liu, Bo, Mcmahon, Bernie, Rousseau, Randy, Shi, Shun, Shuren, Richard, Smart, Lawrence B., Stanosz, Glen, Stanton, Brain, Stokes, Bryce, and Wright, Jeff. Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12498.
Volk, Timothy A., Berguson, Bill, Daly, Christopher, Halbleib, Michael D., Miller, Raymond, Rials, Timothy G., Abrahamson, Lawrence P., Buchman, Dan, Buford, Marylin, Cunningham, Michael W., Eisenbies, Mark, Fabio, Eric S., Hallen, Karl, Heavey, Justin, Johnson, Gregg A., Kuzovkina, Yulia A., Liu, Bo, Mcmahon, Bernie, Rousseau, Randy, Shi, Shun, Shuren, Richard, Smart, Lawrence B., Stanosz, Glen, Stanton, Brain, Stokes, Bryce, & Wright, Jeff. Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12498
Volk, Timothy A., Berguson, Bill, Daly, Christopher, Halbleib, Michael D., Miller, Raymond, Rials, Timothy G., Abrahamson, Lawrence P., Buchman, Dan, Buford, Marylin, Cunningham, Michael W., Eisenbies, Mark, Fabio, Eric S., Hallen, Karl, Heavey, Justin, Johnson, Gregg A., Kuzovkina, Yulia A., Liu, Bo, Mcmahon, Bernie, Rousseau, Randy, Shi, Shun, Shuren, Richard, Smart, Lawrence B., Stanosz, Glen, Stanton, Brain, Stokes, Bryce, and Wright, Jeff. Tue . "Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12498.
@article{osti_1422015,
title = {Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model},
author = {Volk, Timothy A. and Berguson, Bill and Daly, Christopher and Halbleib, Michael D. and Miller, Raymond and Rials, Timothy G. and Abrahamson, Lawrence P. and Buchman, Dan and Buford, Marylin and Cunningham, Michael W. and Eisenbies, Mark and Fabio, Eric S. and Hallen, Karl and Heavey, Justin and Johnson, Gregg A. and Kuzovkina, Yulia A. and Liu, Bo and Mcmahon, Bernie and Rousseau, Randy and Shi, Shun and Shuren, Richard and Smart, Lawrence B. and Stanosz, Glen and Stanton, Brain and Stokes, Bryce and Wright, Jeff},
abstractNote = {Abstract To increase the understanding of poplar and willow perennial woody crops and facilitate their deployment for the production of biofuels, bioproducts, and bioenergy, there is a need for broadscale yield maps. For national analysis of woody and herbaceous crops production potential, biomass feedstock yield maps should be developed using a common framework. This study developed willow and poplar potential yield maps by combining data from a network of willow and poplar field trials and the modeling power of PRISM‐ELM. Yields of the top three willow cultivars across 17 sites ranged from 3.60 to 14.6 Mg ha −1  yr −1 dry weight, while the yields from 17 poplar trials ranged from 7.5 to 15.2 Mg ha −1  yr −1 . Relationships between the environmental suitability estimates from the PRISM‐ELM model and results from field trials had an R 2 of 0.60 for poplar and 0.81 for willow. The resulting potential yield maps reflected the range of poplar and willow yields that have been reported in the literature. Poplar covered a larger geographic range than willow, which likely reflects the poplar breeding efforts that have occurred for many more decades using genotypes from a broader range of environments than willow. While the field trial data sets used to develop these models represent the most complete information at the time, there is a need to expand and improve the model by monitoring trials over multiple cutting cycles and across a broader range of environmental gradients. Despite some limitations, the results of these models represent a dramatic improvement in projections of potential yield of poplar and willow crops across the United States.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.12498},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = 10,
volume = 10,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Feb 20 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Tue Feb 20 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12498

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 49 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review: ENERGY AND GREENHOUSE GAS BALANCE OF BIOENERGY PRODUCTION
journal, November 2010


Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge
journal, July 2008


A novel approach to simulate growth of multi-stem willow in bioenergy production systems with a simple process-based model (3PG)
journal, January 2011


Poplar breeding and testing strategies in the north-central U.S.: Demonstration of potential yield and consideration of future research needs
journal, April 2001

  • Riemenschneider, Don E.; Isebrands, J. G.; Berguson, William E.
  • The Forestry Chronicle, Vol. 77, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5558/tfc77245-2

Populus Breeding: From the Classical to the Genomic Approach
book, December 2009


Assessment of regional willow coppice yield in Sweden on basis of water availability
journal, August 1999


Impact of Shrub Willow (Salix spp.) as a Potential Bioenergy Feedstock on Water Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
journal, April 2017

  • Bressler, Alison S.; Vidon, Philippe G.; Volk, Timothy A.
  • Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, Vol. 228, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3350-4

Use of short-rotation coppice willow crops by birds and small mammals in central New York
journal, December 2012


Avian species richness and reproduction in short-rotation coppice habitats in central and western New York
journal, March 2007


Maximum Annual Potential Yields of Salix miyabeana SX67 in Southern Quebec and Effects of Coppicing and Stool Age
journal, May 2016


Genotype × environment interaction analysis of North American shrub willow yield trials confirms superior performance of triploid hybrids
journal, March 2016

  • Fabio, Eric S.; Volk, Timothy A.; Miller, Raymond O.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12344

Yield models for commercial willow biomass plantations in Sweden
journal, September 2008


Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK
journal, April 2008


Incorporating Uncertainty into a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model of Short-Rotation Willow Biomass (Salix spp.) Crops
journal, June 2013


Contributions of environment and genotype to variation in shrub willow biomass composition
journal, December 2017


Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK
journal, January 2009

  • Rowe, Rebecca L.; Street, Nathaniel R.; Taylor, Gail
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008

Evaluation of a Single-Pass, Cut and Chip Harvest System on Commercial-Scale, Short-Rotation Shrub Willow Biomass Crops
journal, June 2014


Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: Identification and quantification
journal, February 1999


Regional potential yields of short rotation willow plantations on agricultural land in Northern Europe
journal, January 2010


Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops
journal, October 2004


Advances in shrub-willow crops for bioenergy, renewable products, and environmental benefits
journal, May 2016

  • Volk, Timothy A.; Heavey, Justin P.; Eisenbies, Mark H.
  • Food and Energy Security, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/fes3.82

Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites
journal, October 2012

  • Serapiglia, Michelle J.; Cameron, Kimberly D.; Stipanovic, Arthur J.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 6, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5

Biomass, spacing and planting design influence cut-and-chip harvesting in hybrid poplar
journal, November 2017


Long-term biomass productivity of willow bioenergy plantations maintained in southern Quebec, Canada
journal, September 2013


Profitability of Willow Biomass Crops Affected by Incentive Programs
journal, July 2012


Environmental limitation mapping of potential biomass resources across the conterminous United States
journal, January 2018

  • Daly, Christopher; Halbleib, Michael D.; Hannaway, David B.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12496

Crop Yield Gaps: Their Importance, Magnitudes, and Causes
journal, November 2009


Biomass and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York State
journal, June 2001


Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. II. Biomass production in a 4-year plantation
journal, April 1985

  • Heilman, Paul E.; Stettler, R. F.
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1139/x85-061

Comparing predicted yield and yield stability of willow and Miscanthus across Denmark
journal, April 2016

  • Larsen, Søren; Jaiswal, Deepak; Bentsen, Niclas S.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12318

Change in Yield Between First and Second Rotations in Willow (Salix spp.) Biomass Crops is Strongly Related to the Level of First Rotation Yield
journal, October 2015