DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads

Abstract

This study presents the results of a campaign that estimated methane emissions at 268 gas production facilities in the Fayetteville shale gas play using onsite measurements (261 facilities) and two downwind methods - the dual tracer flux ratio method (Tracer Facility Estimate - TFE, 17 facilities) and the EPA Other Test Method 33a (OTM33A Facility Estimate - OFE, 50 facilities). A study onsite estimate (SOE) for each facility was developed by combining direct measurements and simulation of unmeasured emission sources, using operator activity data and emission data from literature. The SOE spans 0-403 kg/h and simulated methane emissions from liquid unloadings account for 88% of total emissions estimated by the SOE, with 76% (95% CI [51%-92%]) contributed by liquid unloading at two facilities. TFE and SOE show overlapping 95% CI between individual estimates at 15 of 16 (94%) facilities where the measurements were paired, while OFE and SOE show overlapping 95% CI between individual estimates at 28 of 43 (65%) facilities. However, variance-weighted least-squares (VWLS) regressions performed on sets of paired estimates indicate statistically significant differences between methods. The SOE represents a lower bound of emissions at facilities where onsite direct measurements of continuously emitting sources are the primary contributormore » to the SOE, a sub-selection of facilities which minimizes expected inter-method differences for intermittent pneumatic controllers and the impact of episodically-emitting unloadings. At 9 such facilities, VWLS indicates that TFE estimates systematically higher emissions than SOE (TFE-to-SOE ratio = 1.6, 95% CI [1.2 to 2.1]). At 20 such facilities, VWLS indicates that OFE estimates systematically lower emissions than SOE (OFE-to-SOE ratio of 0.41 [0.26 to 0.90]). Given that SOE at these facilities is a lower limit on emissions, these results indicate that OFE is likely a less accurate method than SOE or TFE for this type of facility.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4];  [5];  [5];  [5];  [5];  [5]
  1. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO (United States). Energy Inst. and Mechanical Engineering
  2. Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA (United States)
  3. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Boulder, CO (United States). Earth System Research Lab.; Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States). Cooperative Inst. for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)
  5. Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY (United States). Dept. of Atmospheric Science
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); Colorado Energy Research Collaboratory
OSTI Identifier:
1418123
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-6A20-70835
Journal ID: ISSN 2325-1026
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308; AC26-07NT42677
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Elementa
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 5; Journal Issue: 0; Journal ID: ISSN 2325-1026
Publisher:
University of California Press
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
03 NATURAL GAS; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Climate change; Natural gas; Methane; Emissions

Citation Formats

Bell, Clay Samuel, Vaughn, Timothy L., Zimmerle, Daniel, Herndon, Scott C., Yacovitch, Tara I., Heath, Garvin A., Pétron, Gabrielle, Edie, Rachel, Field, Robert A., Murphy, Shane M., Robertson, Anna M., and Soltis, Jeffrey. Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1525/elementa.266.
Bell, Clay Samuel, Vaughn, Timothy L., Zimmerle, Daniel, Herndon, Scott C., Yacovitch, Tara I., Heath, Garvin A., Pétron, Gabrielle, Edie, Rachel, Field, Robert A., Murphy, Shane M., Robertson, Anna M., & Soltis, Jeffrey. Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads. United States. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.266
Bell, Clay Samuel, Vaughn, Timothy L., Zimmerle, Daniel, Herndon, Scott C., Yacovitch, Tara I., Heath, Garvin A., Pétron, Gabrielle, Edie, Rachel, Field, Robert A., Murphy, Shane M., Robertson, Anna M., and Soltis, Jeffrey. Thu . "Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads". United States. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.266. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1418123.
@article{osti_1418123,
title = {Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads},
author = {Bell, Clay Samuel and Vaughn, Timothy L. and Zimmerle, Daniel and Herndon, Scott C. and Yacovitch, Tara I. and Heath, Garvin A. and Pétron, Gabrielle and Edie, Rachel and Field, Robert A. and Murphy, Shane M. and Robertson, Anna M. and Soltis, Jeffrey},
abstractNote = {This study presents the results of a campaign that estimated methane emissions at 268 gas production facilities in the Fayetteville shale gas play using onsite measurements (261 facilities) and two downwind methods - the dual tracer flux ratio method (Tracer Facility Estimate - TFE, 17 facilities) and the EPA Other Test Method 33a (OTM33A Facility Estimate - OFE, 50 facilities). A study onsite estimate (SOE) for each facility was developed by combining direct measurements and simulation of unmeasured emission sources, using operator activity data and emission data from literature. The SOE spans 0-403 kg/h and simulated methane emissions from liquid unloadings account for 88% of total emissions estimated by the SOE, with 76% (95% CI [51%-92%]) contributed by liquid unloading at two facilities. TFE and SOE show overlapping 95% CI between individual estimates at 15 of 16 (94%) facilities where the measurements were paired, while OFE and SOE show overlapping 95% CI between individual estimates at 28 of 43 (65%) facilities. However, variance-weighted least-squares (VWLS) regressions performed on sets of paired estimates indicate statistically significant differences between methods. The SOE represents a lower bound of emissions at facilities where onsite direct measurements of continuously emitting sources are the primary contributor to the SOE, a sub-selection of facilities which minimizes expected inter-method differences for intermittent pneumatic controllers and the impact of episodically-emitting unloadings. At 9 such facilities, VWLS indicates that TFE estimates systematically higher emissions than SOE (TFE-to-SOE ratio = 1.6, 95% CI [1.2 to 2.1]). At 20 such facilities, VWLS indicates that OFE estimates systematically lower emissions than SOE (OFE-to-SOE ratio of 0.41 [0.26 to 0.90]). Given that SOE at these facilities is a lower limit on emissions, these results indicate that OFE is likely a less accurate method than SOE or TFE for this type of facility.},
doi = {10.1525/elementa.266},
journal = {Elementa},
number = 0,
volume = 5,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 3 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements
journal, August 2014


Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers
journal, December 2014

  • Allen, David T.; Pacsi, Adam P.; Sullivan, David W.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5040156

Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Liquid Unloadings
journal, December 2014

  • Allen, David T.; Sullivan, David W.; Zavala-Araiza, Daniel
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/es504016r

Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States
journal, September 2013

  • Allen, D. T.; Torres, V. M.; Thomas, J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 44
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304880110

Possible malfunction in widely used methane sampler deserves attention but poses limited implications for supply chain emission estimates
journal, December 2016


Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure
journal, April 2012

  • Alvarez, R. A.; Pacala, S. W.; Winebrake, J. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202407109

Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems
journal, February 2014


Assessment of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Pads using Mobile Measurements
journal, November 2014

  • Brantley, Halley L.; Thoma, Eben D.; Squier, William C.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1021/es503070q

Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development
journal, April 2014

  • Caulton, D. R.; Shepson, P. B.; Santoro, R. L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316546111

Using Multi-Scale Measurements to Improve Methane Emission Estimates from Oil and Gas Operations in the Barnett Shale Region, Texas
journal, June 2015

  • Harriss, Robert; Alvarez, Ramón A.; Lyon, David
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02305

Methane Emissions from Leak and Loss Audits of Natural Gas Compressor Stations and Storage Facilities
journal, June 2015

  • Johnson, Derek R.; Covington, April N.; Clark, Nigel N.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es506163m

Aircraft-Based Estimate of Total Methane Emissions from the Barnett Shale Region
journal, June 2015

  • Karion, Anna; Sweeney, Colm; Kort, Eric A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00217

Direct Measurements Show Decreasing Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Local Distribution Systems in the United States
journal, March 2015

  • Lamb, Brian K.; Edburg, Steven L.; Ferrara, Thomas W.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/es505116p

Development of Atmospheric Tracer Methods To Measure Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Facilities and Urban Areas
journal, June 1995

  • Lamb, Brian K.; McManus, J. B.; Shorter, Joanne H.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 29, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es00006a007

Characterizing Fugitive Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Area Using a Mobile Laboratory
journal, June 2015

  • Lan, Xin; Talbot, Robert; Laine, Patrick
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5063055

Aircraft-Based Measurements of Point Source Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Basin
journal, June 2015

  • Lavoie, Tegan N.; Shepson, Paul B.; Cambaliza, Maria O. L.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00410

Aerial Surveys of Elevated Hydrocarbon Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Sites
journal, April 2016

  • Lyon, David R.; Alvarez, Ramón A.; Zavala-Araiza, Daniel
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00705

Constructing a Spatially Resolved Methane Emission Inventory for the Barnett Shale Region
journal, June 2015

  • Lyon, David R.; Zavala-Araiza, Daniel; Alvarez, Ramón A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es506359c

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States
journal, November 2013

  • Miller, S. M.; Wofsy, S. C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314392110

Measurements of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Gathering Facilities and Processing Plants: Measurement Results
journal, February 2015

  • Mitchell, Austin L.; Tkacik, Daniel S.; Roscioli, Joseph R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5052809

Near-Field Characterization of Methane Emission Variability from a Compressor Station Using a Model Aircraft
journal, May 2015

  • Nathan, Brian J.; Golston, Levi M.; O’Brien, Anthony S.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00705

An accurate and straightforward approach to line regression analysis of error-affected experimental data
journal, April 1989

  • Neri, F.; Saitta, G.; Chiofalo, S.
  • Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, Vol. 22, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/22/4/002

A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin: Hydrocarbon emissions in oil & gas basin
journal, June 2014

  • Pétron, Gabrielle; Karion, Anna; Sweeney, Colm
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021272

Measuring Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Well Pads Using the Mobile Flux Plane Technique
journal, March 2015

  • Rella, Chris W.; Tsai, Tracy R.; Botkin, Connor G.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00099

Variation in Methane Emission Rates from Well Pads in Four Oil and Gas Basins with Contrasting Production Volumes and Compositions
journal, July 2017

  • Robertson, Anna M.; Edie, Rachel; Snare, Dustin
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00571

Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: measurement methods
journal, January 2015

  • Roscioli, J. R.; Yacovitch, T. I.; Floerchinger, C.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-2017-2015

Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Compressor Stations in the Transmission and Storage Sector: Measurements and Comparisons with the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Protocol
journal, February 2015

  • Subramanian, R.; Williams, Laurie L.; Vaughn, Timothy L.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5060258

Integrating Source Apportionment Tracers into a Bottom-up Inventory of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Hydraulic Fracturing Region
journal, June 2015

  • Townsend-Small, Amy; Marrero, Josette E.; Lyon, David R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00057

Natural gas facility methane emissions: measurements by tracer flux ratio in two US natural gas producing basins
journal, February 2017

  • Yacovitch, Tara I.; Daube, Conner; Vaughn, Timothy L.
  • Elem Sci Anth, Vol. 5, Issue 0
  • DOI: 10.1525/elementa.251

Mobile Laboratory Observations of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Region
journal, March 2015

  • Yacovitch, Tara I.; Herndon, Scott C.; Pétron, Gabrielle
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es506352j

Toward a Functional Definition of Methane Super-Emitters: Application to Natural Gas Production Sites
journal, June 2015

  • Zavala-Araiza, Daniel; Lyon, David; Alvarez, Ramón A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00133

Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions
journal, December 2015

  • Zavala-Araiza, Daniel; Lyon, David R.; Alvarez, Ramón A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522126112

Works referencing / citing this record:

A review of close-range and screening technologies for mitigating fugitive methane emissions in upstream oil and gas
journal, April 2019

  • Fox, Thomas A.; Barchyn, Thomas E.; Risk, David
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cc3

Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region
journal, October 2018

  • Vaughn, Timothy L.; Bell, Clay S.; Pickering, Cody K.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 46
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805687115

Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A
journal, January 2020

  • Edie, Rachel; Robertson, Anna M.; Field, Robert A.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-341-2020