A repeated sampling method for oil spill impact uncertainty and interpolation

Nelson, J. R.; Grubesic, T. H.

doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.014

Title: A repeated sampling method for oil spill impact uncertainty and interpolation

Full Record
Other Related Research

Authors:: Nelson, J. R.; Grubesic, T. H.

Publication Date:: 2017-06-01

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE

OSTI Identifier:: 1416869

Grant/Contract Number:: FY14-17; 2000007349

Resource Type:: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Name: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction Journal Volume: 22 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 2212-4209

Publisher:: Elsevier

Country of Publication:: Country unknown/Code not available

Language:: English

Citation Formats


                    Nelson, J. R., and Grubesic, T. H.. A repeated sampling method for oil spill impact uncertainty and interpolation.  Country unknown/Code not available: N. p., 2017. 
Web.  doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.014.

Copy to clipboard


                    Nelson, J. R., & Grubesic, T. H.. A repeated sampling method for oil spill impact uncertainty and interpolation.  Country unknown/Code not available.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.014

Copy to clipboard


                    Nelson, J. R., and Grubesic, T. H.. Thu .  
"A repeated sampling method for oil spill impact uncertainty and interpolation".  Country unknown/Code not available.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.014.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1416869,

  title        = {A repeated sampling method for oil spill impact uncertainty and interpolation},

  author       = {Nelson, J. R. and Grubesic, T. H.},

  abstractNote = {},

  doi          = {10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.014},

  journal      = {International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction},

  number       = C,

  volume       = 22,

  place        = {Country unknown/Code not available},

  year         = {2017},

  month        = {6}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.014

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 16 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Method for ranking biological habitats in oil spill response planning and impact assessment

Technical Report Adams, J K ; Benkert, K A ; Keller, C ; ...

The report describes a method that enables oil spill response planners to minimize the ecological impacts of oil spills by determining protection priorities for biological habitats. The objective of the method is to allow persons responding to an oil spill to quickly identify areas that should be protected first, second, and on to the extent that personnel and equipment are available. The first part of the report describes the rationale and general components of the method. The last part presents an application of the method to the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port (LOOP) spill response planning area.
Method for ranking biological habitats in oil spill response planning and impact assessment

Technical Report Adams, J K ; Benkert, K A ; Keller, C ; ...

The report describes a method that enables oil spill response planners to minimize the ecological impacts of oil spills by determining protection priorites for biological habitats. The objective of the method is to allow persons responding to an oil spill to quickly identify areas that should be protected first, second, and on to the extent that personnel and equipment are available. The first part of the report describes the rationale and general components of the method. The last part presents an application of the method to the Louisana Offshore Oil Port (LOOP) spill response planning area. 28 references, 9 tables.
Petroleum hydrocarbons in near-surface seawater of Prince William Sound, Alaska, following the Exxon Valdez oil spill I: Chemical sampling and analysis. Air/water study number 3. Exxon Valdez oil spill state/federal natural resource damage assessment final report

Technical Report Short, J W ; Harris, P M

We sampled 32 locations during each of three sampling periods between 31 March through 8 May 1989 in Prince William Sound, Alaska, for hydrocarbons in seawater at depths of 1-m and 5-m following the grounding of the T/V Exxon Valdez on 24 March 1989. Samples were analyzed for 22 alkane and 43 polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) analytes. The results show that Exxon Valdez crude oil PAHs were available to subsurface marine fauna the first few weeks following grounding of the T/V Exxon Valdez, especially in near-shore, near-surface waters that are biologically productive. Measured PAH concentrations, however, were well below thosemore » acutely toxic to marine fauna.« less
Oil spill contingency planning to minimize impacts from a major oil well spill

Conference Collins, J W ; Poley, J P - Offshore Technol. Conf.; (United States)

The technology does not exist to totally recover all the oil that is spilled at sea. Therefore, spill recovery technology available today must be used, along with all available facts to develop contingency plans which will minimize the negative impact of oil entering the marine environment. To do this effectively, certain information must be available and certain decisions must be made. This paper deals primarily with the specific information that should be gathered and decisions that must be made in order to develop an effective contingency plan.
USNS Potomac oil spill, Melville Bay, Greenland, 5 August 1977. A joint report on scientific studies and impact assessment by the NOAA-USCG Spilled Oil Research Team and the Greenland Fisheries Investigations, Ministry for Greenland

Technical Report Grose, P L ; Mattson, J S ; Petersen, H

This report presents the studies and findings of the NOAA-USCG Spilled Oil Research and Greenland Fisheries Investigations, Ministry for Greenland teams which responded to study the spill. In summary, the fate of the 107,000 gallons of spilled Bunker-C fuel was that 33% evaporated; the major part of the remaining seems to have sunk in 1,000 meters of water over a large area of Melville Bay and a small part remained on the surface as small pancakes. A very small amount of the oil was accommodated into the water column. Melville Bay is not a highly bioproductive area in terms ofmore »« less

Similar Records