skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: How to use the Standard Model effective field theory

Abstract

Here, we present a practical three-step procedure of using the Standard Model effective field theory (SM EFT) to connect ultraviolet (UV) models of new physics with weak scale precision observables. With this procedure, one can interpret precision measurements as constraints on a given UV model. We give a detailed explanation for calculating the effective action up to one-loop order in a manifestly gauge covariant fashion. This covariant derivative expansion method dramatically simplifies the process of matching a UV model with the SM EFT, and also makes available a universal formalism that is easy to use for a variety of UV models. A few general aspects of RG running effects and choosing operator bases are discussed. Finally, we provide mapping results between the bosonic sector of the SM EFT and a complete set of precision electroweak and Higgs observables to which present and near future experiments are sensitive. Many results and tools which should prove useful to those wishing to use the SM EFT are detailed in several appendices.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2]
  1. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States). Dept. of Physics; Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Theoretical Physics Group
  2. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States). Dept. of Physics; Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Theoretical Physics Group; Univ. of Tokyo (Japan). Kavli Inst. for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), Todai Inst. for Advanced Study
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); National Science Foundation (NSF); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
OSTI Identifier:
1415951
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; AC03-76SF00098; PHY-1002399; PHY-1316783; 23540289
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of High Energy Physics (Online); Journal Volume: 2016; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1029-8479
Publisher:
Springer Berlin
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; Effective field theories; Beyond Standard Model; Gauge Symmetry

Citation Formats

Henning, Brian, Lu, Xiaochuan, and Murayama, Hitoshi. How to use the Standard Model effective field theory. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)023.
Henning, Brian, Lu, Xiaochuan, & Murayama, Hitoshi. How to use the Standard Model effective field theory. United States. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)023.
Henning, Brian, Lu, Xiaochuan, and Murayama, Hitoshi. Wed . "How to use the Standard Model effective field theory". United States. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)023. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1415951.
@article{osti_1415951,
title = {How to use the Standard Model effective field theory},
author = {Henning, Brian and Lu, Xiaochuan and Murayama, Hitoshi},
abstractNote = {Here, we present a practical three-step procedure of using the Standard Model effective field theory (SM EFT) to connect ultraviolet (UV) models of new physics with weak scale precision observables. With this procedure, one can interpret precision measurements as constraints on a given UV model. We give a detailed explanation for calculating the effective action up to one-loop order in a manifestly gauge covariant fashion. This covariant derivative expansion method dramatically simplifies the process of matching a UV model with the SM EFT, and also makes available a universal formalism that is easy to use for a variety of UV models. A few general aspects of RG running effects and choosing operator bases are discussed. Finally, we provide mapping results between the bosonic sector of the SM EFT and a complete set of precision electroweak and Higgs observables to which present and near future experiments are sensitive. Many results and tools which should prove useful to those wishing to use the SM EFT are detailed in several appendices.},
doi = {10.1007/JHEP01(2016)023},
journal = {Journal of High Energy Physics (Online)},
number = 1,
volume = 2016,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {1}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 75 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Littlest Higgs
journal, July 2002


The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking
journal, February 2008


Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
journal, October 1999


A global fit to extended oblique parameters
journal, May 1994


A General Treatment of Oblique Parameters
journal, March 1997


Naive dimensional analysis counting of gauge theory amplitudes and anomalous dimensions
journal, November 2013


Low-energy constraints on electroweak three gauge boson couplings
journal, June 1992


Electroweak constraints on new physics
journal, June 2011


A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators
journal, July 2013

  • Dumont, Beranger; Fichet, Sylvain; von Gersdorff, Gero
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2013)065

Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction
journal, July 2001


Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics
journal, January 2014


BSM Primary effects
conference, September 2014

  • Gupta, Rick
  • Proceedings of XXII. International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects — PoS(DIS2014)
  • DOI: 10.22323/1.203.0133

Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC
journal, September 2012


Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
journal, September 2012


Renormalization group scaling of Higgs operators and h → γγ decay
journal, April 2013

  • Grojean, Christophe; Jenkins, Elizabeth E.; Manohar, Aneesh V.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2013)016

Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology
journal, April 2014

  • Alonso, Rodrigo; Jenkins, Elizabeth E.; Manohar, Aneesh V.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)159

Future experimental programs
journal, December 2013


TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem
journal, September 2003


Precision Higgsstrahlung as a probe of new physics
journal, March 2015

  • Craig, Nathaniel; Farina, Marco; McCullough, Matthew
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2015)146

The electroweak fit of the standard model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC
journal, November 2012


Derivative Expansion of the Effective Action
journal, November 1985


Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ
journal, August 2013

  • Elias-Miró, J.; Espinosa, J. R.; Masso, E.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2013)033

Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators
journal, June 2014


Higgs boson triplets with Mw=Mzcos θw
journal, December 1985


Calculations in external fields in quantum chromodynamics. Technical review
journal, January 1984

  • Novikov, V. A.; Shifman, M. A.; Vainshtein, A. I.
  • Fortschritte der Physik, Vol. 32, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/prop.19840321102

Possible futures of electroweak precision: ILC, FCC-ee, and CEPC
journal, September 2015

  • Fan, JiJi; Reece, Matthew; Wang, Lian-Tao
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)196

An exactly solvable model for dimension-six Higgs operators and <mml:math altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll" xmlns:xocs="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/xocs/dtd" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" xmlns:ja="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:tb="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/table/dtd" xmlns:sb="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/struct-bib/dtd" xmlns:ce="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/dtd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:cals="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/cals/dtd" xmlns:sa="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/struct-aff/dtd"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:math>
journal, October 2013


An effective guide to beyond the Standard Model physics
journal, October 2014


Chiral gauge theory
journal, October 1989


Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators. I: formalism and λ dependence
journal, October 2013

  • Jenkins, Elizabeth E.; Manohar, Aneesh V.; Trott, Michael
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2013)087

Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP1 and LEP2
journal, December 2004


Effective Field Theory Beyond the Standard Model
journal, October 2014


Review of Particle Physics
journal, July 2012


Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavour conservation
journal, May 1986


Pinch technique: Theory and applications
journal, August 2009


The effective Standard Model after LHC Run I
journal, March 2015

  • Ellis, John; Sanz, Verónica; You, Tevong
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2015)157

Electroweak limits on physics beyond the Standard Mode
journal, January 2013


A new six-dimensional approach to the Weinberg-Salam model
journal, October 1979


Scaling and tuning of EW and Higgs observables
journal, May 2014

  • Elias-Miró, Joan; Grojean, Christophe; Gupta, Rick S.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2014)019

Higgs windows to new physics through d = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions
journal, November 2013

  • Elias-Miró, J.; Espinosa, J. R.; Masso, E.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)066

Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators
journal, February 2015


The strongly-interacting light Higgs
journal, June 2007

  • Giudice, Gian Francesco; Grojean, Christophe; Pomarol, Alex
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2007, Issue 06
  • DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/045

Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian
journal, October 2010

  • Grzadkowski, B.; Iskrzyński, M.; Misiak, M.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2010, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085

Effective theories and measurements at colliders
journal, January 2015


Renormalization group evolution of the Standard Model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence
journal, January 2014

  • Jenkins, Elizabeth E.; Manohar, Aneesh V.; Trott, Michael
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2014)035

An Introduction to Effective Field Theory
journal, November 2007


The effective one-loop scalar lagrangian with derivative couplings
journal, May 1986


Probing the weak boson sector in e+e−→W+W−
journal, January 1987


Holomorphy without supersymmetry in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory
journal, December 2014


Effective-Action Expansion in Perturbation Theory
journal, March 1985


The Minimal Moose for a Little Higgs
journal, August 2002


Little Hierarchy, Little Higgses, and a Little Symmetry
journal, August 2004


Doubly charged Higgs bosons
journal, December 1985


Effective action for the standard model with large Higgs mass
journal, February 1988


On gauge invariance and minimal coupling
journal, September 2013

  • Jenkins, Elizabeth E.; Manohar, Aneesh V.; Trott, Michael
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)063

    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Model-independent determination of the triple Higgs coupling at e + e colliders
    journal, March 2018


    Learning from Higgs physics at future Higgs factories
    journal, December 2017

    • Gu, Jiayin; Li, Honglei; Liu, Zhen
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 12
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2017)153

    Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching
    journal, May 2017


    Effective theories of universal theories
    journal, January 2016

    • Wells, James D.; Zhang, Zhengkang
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2016)123

    Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching
    journal, May 2017


    Incorporating doubly resonant W ± data in a global fit of SMEFT parameters to lift flat directions
    journal, September 2016

    • Berthier, Laure; Bjørn, Mikkel; Trott, Michael
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 9
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2016)157

    Model-independent determination of the triple Higgs coupling at e + e colliders
    journal, March 2018


    Learning from Higgs Physics at Future Higgs Factories
    text, January 2017


    Gravitational wave and collider searches for electroweak symmetry breaking patterns
    journal, February 2020


    Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching
    text, January 2016


    Learning from Higgs Physics at Future Higgs Factories
    text, January 2017


    Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: anomalous dimensions
    journal, January 2018

    • Jenkins, Elizabeth E.; Manohar, Aneesh V.; Stoffer, Peter
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2018)084

    One-loop matching and running with covariant derivative expansion
    journal, January 2018

    • Henning, Brian; Lu, Xiaochuan; Murayama, Hitoshi
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2018)123

    Completing the scalar and fermionic universal one-loop effective action
    journal, January 2020

    • Krämer, Michael; Summ, Benjamin; Voigt, Alexander
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2020)079

    Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods
    journal, February 2016


    Complete one-loop matching for a singlet scalar in the Standard Model EFT
    journal, February 2019

    • Jiang, Minyuan; Craig, Nathaniel; Li, Ying-Ying
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2019)031

    Sensitivities of prospective future e + e − colliders to decoupled new physics
    journal, March 2016


    Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary
    journal, March 2018

    • de Blas, J.; Criado, J. C.; Pérez-Victoria, M.
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2018)109

    Type-II 2HDM under the precision measurements at the Z-pole and a Higgs factory
    journal, March 2019

    • Chen, Ning; Han, Tao; Su, Shufang
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2019)023

    Dimension-6 operator analysis of the CLIC sensitivity to new physics
    journal, May 2017

    • Ellis, John; Roloff, Philipp; Sanz, Verónica
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 5
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2017)096

    Exploring extended scalar sectors with di-Higgs signals: a Higgs EFT perspective
    journal, May 2018

    • Corbett, Tyler; Joglekar, Aniket; Li, Hao-Lin
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 5
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2018)061

    Probing 6D operators at future e−e+ colliders
    journal, May 2018

    • Chiu, Wen Han; Leung, Sze Ching; Liu, Tao
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 5
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2018)081

    Updated global SMEFT fit to Higgs, diboson and electroweak data
    journal, June 2018

    • Ellis, John; Murphy, Christopher W.; Sanz, Verónica
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 6
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep06(2018)146

    On the validity of the effective field theory approach to SM precision tests
    journal, July 2016

    • Contino, Roberto; Falkowski, Adam; Goertz, Florian
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 7
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2016)144

    Precision probes of QCD at high energies
    journal, July 2017

    • Alioli, Simone; Farina, Marco; Pappadopulo, Duccio
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 7
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2017)097

    2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . .: higher dimension operators in the SM EFT
    journal, August 2017

    • Henning, Brian; Lu, Xiaochuan; Melia, Tom
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 8
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2017)016

    Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT
    journal, August 2017

    • Falkowski, Adam; González-Alonso, Martín; Mimouni, Kin
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 8
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2017)123

    The Ĥ-parameter: an oblique Higgs view
    journal, September 2019

    • Englert, Christoph; Giudice, Gian F.; Greljo, Admir
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 9
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2019)041

    Learning from Higgs physics at future Higgs factories
    journal, December 2017

    • Gu, Jiayin; Li, Honglei; Liu, Zhen
    • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 12
    • DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2017)153

    Testing the electroweak phase transition in scalar extension models at lepton colliders
    journal, January 2018


    Standard model parameters in the tadpole-free pure MS ¯ scheme
    journal, October 2019


    Pushing Higgs effective theory to its limits
    journal, April 2016


    When matching matters: Loop effects in Higgs effective theory
    journal, November 2016


    Renormalization group evolution of Higgs effective field theory
    journal, February 2018


    Probing the electroweak phase transition via enhanced di-Higgs boson production
    journal, May 2018


    Exploring dynamical C P violation induced baryogenesis by gravitational waves and colliders
    journal, July 2018


    A guide to constraining effective field theories with machine learning
    journal, September 2018


    Effective action for gauge bosons
    journal, January 2019


    Effective field theory in the top sector: Do multijets help?
    journal, February 2019


    Higgs inflation and cosmological electroweak phase transition with N scalars in the post-Higgs era
    journal, February 2019


    One-loop effective lagrangians after matching
    journal, April 2016


    Improved determination of the Higgs mass in the MSSM with heavy superpartners
    journal, May 2017


    DsixTools: the standard model effective field theory toolkit
    journal, June 2017


    Probing $$\textit{CP}$$ CP -violating Higgs and gauge-boson couplings in the Standard Model effective field theory
    journal, October 2017


    Studies of dimension-six EFT effects in vector boson scattering
    journal, May 2019


    Measurement of fiducial and differential $$W^+W^-$$W+W- production cross-sections at $$\sqrt{s}=13$$s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector
    journal, October 2019


    Extending the universal one-loop effective action by regularization scheme translating operators
    text, January 2018


    The leptonic future of the Higgs
    text, January 2017

    • Durieux, Gauthier; Grojean, Christophe; Gu, Jiayin
    • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Hamburg
    • DOI: 10.3204/pubdb-2017-11755

    Fusing Vectors into Scalars at High Energy Lepton Colliders
    text, January 2018

    • Buttazzo, Dario; Redigolo, Diego; Sala, Filippo
    • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Hamburg
    • DOI: 10.3204/pubdb-2018-02686

    The HiggsTools handbook: a beginners guide to decoding the Higgs sector
    text, January 2018

    • Boggia, M.; Cruz-Martinez, J. M.; Frellesvig, Hjalte
    • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Hamburg
    • DOI: 10.3204/pubdb-2019-00807