Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector
Abstract
Electricity prices on the European market have decreased significantly over the past few years, resulting in a deterioration of Swiss hydropower firms’ competitiveness and profitability. One option to improve the sector’s competitiveness is to increase cost efficiency. The goal of this study is to quantify the level of persistent and transient cost efficiency of individual firms by applying the generalized true random effects (GTRE) model introduced by Colombi et al. (Journal of Productivity Analysis 42(2): 123–136, 2014) and Filippini and Greene (Journal of Productivity Analysis 45(2): 187–196, 2016). Applying this newly developed GTRE model to a total cost function, the level of cost efficiency of 65 Swiss hydropower firms is analyzed for the period between 2000 and 2013. A true random effects specification is estimated as a benchmark for the transient level of cost efficiency. The results show the presence of both transient as well as persistent cost inefficiencies. The GTREM predicts the aggregate level of cost inefficiency to amount to 21.8% (8.0% transient, 13.8% persistent) on average between 2000 and 2013. These two components differ in interpretation and implication. From an individual firm’s perspective, the two types of cost inefficiencies might require a firm’s management to respond with differentmore »
- Authors:
-
- Centre for Energy Policy and Economics, Zurich (Switzerland). Department of Management, Technology and Economics; University of Lugano (Switzerland). Department of Economics
- Centre for Energy Policy and Economics, Zurich (Switzerland). Department of Management, Technology and Economics; Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States). MIT Energy Initiative, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
- New York University, New York, NY (United States). Department of Economics, Stern School of Business
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1413515
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC05-76RL01830
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Productivity Analysis
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 49; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 0895-562X
- Publisher:
- Springer
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; 13 HYDRO ENERGY; Efficiency measurement; Stochastic frontier analysis; Persistent and transient cost efficiency; Hydropower
Citation Formats
Filippini, Massimo, Geissmann, Thomas, and Greene, William H. Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1007/S11123-017-0522-6.
Filippini, Massimo, Geissmann, Thomas, & Greene, William H. Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector. United States. doi:10.1007/S11123-017-0522-6.
Filippini, Massimo, Geissmann, Thomas, and Greene, William H. Mon .
"Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector". United States. doi:10.1007/S11123-017-0522-6. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1413515.
@article{osti_1413515,
title = {Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector},
author = {Filippini, Massimo and Geissmann, Thomas and Greene, William H.},
abstractNote = {Electricity prices on the European market have decreased significantly over the past few years, resulting in a deterioration of Swiss hydropower firms’ competitiveness and profitability. One option to improve the sector’s competitiveness is to increase cost efficiency. The goal of this study is to quantify the level of persistent and transient cost efficiency of individual firms by applying the generalized true random effects (GTRE) model introduced by Colombi et al. (Journal of Productivity Analysis 42(2): 123–136, 2014) and Filippini and Greene (Journal of Productivity Analysis 45(2): 187–196, 2016). Applying this newly developed GTRE model to a total cost function, the level of cost efficiency of 65 Swiss hydropower firms is analyzed for the period between 2000 and 2013. A true random effects specification is estimated as a benchmark for the transient level of cost efficiency. The results show the presence of both transient as well as persistent cost inefficiencies. The GTREM predicts the aggregate level of cost inefficiency to amount to 21.8% (8.0% transient, 13.8% persistent) on average between 2000 and 2013. These two components differ in interpretation and implication. From an individual firm’s perspective, the two types of cost inefficiencies might require a firm’s management to respond with different improvement strategies. The existing level of persistent inefficiency could prevent the hydropower firms from adjusting their production processes to new market environments. From a regulatory point of view, the results of this study could be used in the scope and determination of the amount of financial support given to struggling firms.},
doi = {10.1007/S11123-017-0522-6},
journal = {Journal of Productivity Analysis},
number = 1,
volume = 49,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {11}
}
Works referenced in this record:
Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers
journal, February 1973
- Christensen, Laurits R.; Jorgenson, Dale W.; Lau, Lawrence J.
- The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 55, Issue 1
Efficiency Measurement in Network Industries: Application to the Swiss Railway Companies
journal, July 2005
- Farsi, Mehdi; Filippini, Massimo; Greene, William
- Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 28, Issue 1
A Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis of Chinese fossil-fuel electricity generation companies
journal, March 2015
- Chen, Zhongfei; Barros, Carlos Pestana; Borges, Maria Rosa
- Energy Economics, Vol. 48
Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming
journal, September 2012
- Kumbhakar, Subal C.; Lien, Gudbrand; Hardaker, J. Brian
- Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 41, Issue 2
A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model
journal, May 1982
- Butler, J. S.; Moffitt, Robert
- Econometrica, Vol. 50, Issue 3
Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model
journal, June 2005
- Greene, William
- Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 126, Issue 2
An analysis of factors that influence the technical efficiency of Malaysian thermal power plants
journal, May 2012
- See, Kok Fong; Coelli, Tim
- Energy Economics, Vol. 34, Issue 3
The translog function and the substitution of equipment, structures, and labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929-68
journal, March 1973
- Berndt, Ernst R.; Christensen, Laurits R.
- Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 1, Issue 1
The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry
journal, August 1981
- Pitt, Mark M.; Lee, Lung-Fei
- Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 9, Issue 1
Efficiency assessment and benchmarking of thermal power plants in India
journal, January 2012
- Shrivastava, Naveen; Sharma, Seema; Chauhan, Kavita
- Energy Policy, Vol. 40
On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model
journal, August 1982
- Jondrow, James; Knox Lovell, C. A.; Materov, Ivan S.
- Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 19, Issue 2-3
Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter?
journal, July 2017
- Badunenko, Oleg; Kumbhakar, Subal C.
- European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 260, Issue 2
Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models
journal, January 2005
- Greene, Willam
- Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 23, Issue 1
Examining the cost efficiency of Chinese hydroelectric companies using a finite mixture model
journal, March 2013
- Barros, Carlos Pestana; Chen, Zhongfei; Managi, Shunsuke
- Energy Economics, Vol. 36
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
journal, July 1977
- Aigner, Dennis; Lovell, C. A. Knox; Schmidt, Peter
- Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 6, Issue 1
A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution
journal, May 1974
- Binswanger, Hans P.
- American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56, Issue 2
Closed-skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short-run efficiency
journal, February 2014
- Colombi, Roberto; Kumbhakar, Subal C.; Martini, Gianmaria
- Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 42, Issue 2
Resource rent taxation and benchmarking—A new perspective for the Swiss hydropower sector
journal, May 2010
- Banfi, Silvia; Filippini, Massimo
- Energy Policy, Vol. 38, Issue 5
Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants: A case study for Portugal
journal, January 2008
- Barros, Carlos Pestana
- Energy Economics, Vol. 30, Issue 1
Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error
journal, June 1977
- Meeusen, Wim; van Den Broeck, Julien
- International Economic Review, Vol. 18, Issue 2
Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants
journal, September 2009
- Yang, Hongliang; Pollitt, Michael
- European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 197, Issue 3
Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels
journal, October 1990
- Cornwell, Christopher; Schmidt, Peter; Sickles, Robin C.
- Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 46, Issue 1-2
The determinants of cost efficiency of hydroelectric generating plants: A random frontier approach
journal, September 2007
- Barros, Carlos P.; Peypoch, Nicolas
- Energy Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 9
Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: with Application to the Pastoral zone of Eastern Australia
journal, December 1977
- Battese, George E.; Corra, Greg S.
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 21, Issue 3
Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies
journal, April 2010
- Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki; Goto, Mika; Ueno, Takahiro
- Energy Policy, Vol. 38, Issue 4
Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach
journal, April 2015
- Filippini, Massimo; Greene, William
- Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 45, Issue 2
FIRM HETEROGENEITY, PERSISTENT AND TRANSIENT TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY: A GENERALIZED TRUE RANDOM-EFFECTS model: FIRM HETEROGENEITY, PERSISTENT AND TRANSIENT TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY
journal, September 2012
- Tsionas, Efthymios G.; Kumbhakar, Subal C.
- Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 29, Issue 1
Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis
journal, February 2010
- Liu, C. H.; Lin, Sue J.; Lewis, Charles
- Energy Policy, Vol. 38, Issue 2
An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias
journal, June 1962
- Zellner, Arnold
- Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 57, Issue 298
Economies of scale in the Swiss hydropower sector
journal, December 2007
- Filippini, Massimo; Luchsinger, Cornelia
- Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 15
Works referencing / citing this record:
TFP change and its components for Swedish manufacturing firms during the 2008–2009 financial crisis
journal, October 2019
- Mattsson, Pontus; Månsson, Jonas; Greene, William H.
- Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 53, Issue 1
Examining degree production and financial context at public master’s colleges and universities in the United States: a distance function approach
journal, October 2019
- Titus, Marvin A.
- Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 26, Issue 2