skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations and Trends of Selected Fuel Economy-Enhancing Biomass-Derived Blendstocks

24 biomass-derived compounds and mixtures, identified based on their physical properties, that could be blended into fuels to improve spark ignition engine fuel economy were assessed for their economic, technology readiness and economic, and environmental viability. These bio-blendstocks were modeled to be produced biochemically, thermochemically, or through hybrid processes. To carry out the assessment, 17 metrics were developed for which each bio-blendstock was determined to be favorable, neutral, or unfavorable. Cellulosic ethanol was included as a reference case. Overall, bio-blendstock yields in biochemical processes were lower than in thermochemical processes, in which all biomass, including lignin, is converted to a product. Bio-blendstock yields were a key determinant in overall viability. Key knowledge gaps included the degree of purity needed for use as a bio-blendstock as compared to a chemical. Less stringent purification requirements for fuels could cut processing costs and environmental impacts. Additionally, more information is needed on the blending behavior of many of these bio-blendstocks with gasoline to support the technology readiness evaluation. Overall, the technology to produce many of these blendstocks from biomass is emerging and as it matures, these assessments must be revisited. Importantly, considering economic, environmental, and technology readiness factors in addition to physical properties ofmore » blendstocks that could be used to boost fuel economy can help spotlight those most likely to be viable in the near term.« less
Authors:
ORCiD logo [1] ;  [2] ;  [3] ;  [1] ;  [1] ;  [2] ; ORCiD logo [2] ;  [2] ;  [2] ;  [2] ; ORCiD logo [2] ;  [3] ;  [3] ;  [3] ;  [3] ;  [4]
  1. Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States
  2. National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  3. Energy Processes and Materials Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
  4. Bioenergy Technologies Group, Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 N. Fremont Avenue, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415, United States
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5100-69028; PNNL-SA-128002; INL/JOU-17-42921
Journal ID: ISSN 2168-0485
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357; AC36-08GO28308; AC05-76RL01830; AC07-05ID14517
Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2168-0485
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Research Org:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States); Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (EE-3B); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Vehicle Technologies Office (EE-3V)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; biofuel; Co-Optima; High octane blendstock; Techno-economic analysis; Life-cycle analysis; Biofuels; biofuels; life-cycle analysis; techno-economic analysis
OSTI Identifier:
1413153
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1414451; OSTI ID: 1421742; OSTI ID: 1421972; OSTI ID: 1429604

Dunn, Jennifer B., Biddy, Mary, Jones, Susanne, Cai, Hao, Benavides, Pahola Thathiana, Markham, Jennifer, Tao, Ling, Tan, Eric, Kinchin, Christopher, Davis, Ryan, Dutta, Abhijit, Bearden, Mark, Clayton, Christopher, Phillips, Steven, Rappé, Kenneth, and Lamers, Patrick. Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations and Trends of Selected Fuel Economy-Enhancing Biomass-Derived Blendstocks. United States: N. p., Web. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02871.
Dunn, Jennifer B., Biddy, Mary, Jones, Susanne, Cai, Hao, Benavides, Pahola Thathiana, Markham, Jennifer, Tao, Ling, Tan, Eric, Kinchin, Christopher, Davis, Ryan, Dutta, Abhijit, Bearden, Mark, Clayton, Christopher, Phillips, Steven, Rappé, Kenneth, & Lamers, Patrick. Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations and Trends of Selected Fuel Economy-Enhancing Biomass-Derived Blendstocks. United States. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02871.
Dunn, Jennifer B., Biddy, Mary, Jones, Susanne, Cai, Hao, Benavides, Pahola Thathiana, Markham, Jennifer, Tao, Ling, Tan, Eric, Kinchin, Christopher, Davis, Ryan, Dutta, Abhijit, Bearden, Mark, Clayton, Christopher, Phillips, Steven, Rappé, Kenneth, and Lamers, Patrick. 2017. "Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations and Trends of Selected Fuel Economy-Enhancing Biomass-Derived Blendstocks". United States. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02871.
@article{osti_1413153,
title = {Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations and Trends of Selected Fuel Economy-Enhancing Biomass-Derived Blendstocks},
author = {Dunn, Jennifer B. and Biddy, Mary and Jones, Susanne and Cai, Hao and Benavides, Pahola Thathiana and Markham, Jennifer and Tao, Ling and Tan, Eric and Kinchin, Christopher and Davis, Ryan and Dutta, Abhijit and Bearden, Mark and Clayton, Christopher and Phillips, Steven and Rappé, Kenneth and Lamers, Patrick},
abstractNote = {24 biomass-derived compounds and mixtures, identified based on their physical properties, that could be blended into fuels to improve spark ignition engine fuel economy were assessed for their economic, technology readiness and economic, and environmental viability. These bio-blendstocks were modeled to be produced biochemically, thermochemically, or through hybrid processes. To carry out the assessment, 17 metrics were developed for which each bio-blendstock was determined to be favorable, neutral, or unfavorable. Cellulosic ethanol was included as a reference case. Overall, bio-blendstock yields in biochemical processes were lower than in thermochemical processes, in which all biomass, including lignin, is converted to a product. Bio-blendstock yields were a key determinant in overall viability. Key knowledge gaps included the degree of purity needed for use as a bio-blendstock as compared to a chemical. Less stringent purification requirements for fuels could cut processing costs and environmental impacts. Additionally, more information is needed on the blending behavior of many of these bio-blendstocks with gasoline to support the technology readiness evaluation. Overall, the technology to produce many of these blendstocks from biomass is emerging and as it matures, these assessments must be revisited. Importantly, considering economic, environmental, and technology readiness factors in addition to physical properties of blendstocks that could be used to boost fuel economy can help spotlight those most likely to be viable in the near term.},
doi = {10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02871},
journal = {ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering},
number = 1,
volume = 6,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {10}
}