DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for Heavy Ion Therapy

Abstract

12C ion therapy has had growing interest in recent years for its excellent dose conformity. However at therapeutic energies, which can be as high as 400 MeV/u, carbon ions produce secondary fragments. For an incident 400 MeV/u 12C ion beam, ~70% of the beam will undergo fragmentation before the Bragg Peak. The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of these fragments must be accurately characterised, as it can result in increasing the risk of secondary cancer for the patient as well as altering the relative biological effectiveness. Here, this work investigates the accuracy of three different nuclear fragmentation models available in the Monte Carlo Toolkit Geant4, the Binary Intranuclear Cascade (BIC), the Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) and the Liege Intranuclear Cascade (INCL++). The models were benchmarked against experimental data for a pristine 400 MeV/u 12C beam incident upon a water phantom, including fragment yield, angular and energy distribution. For fragment yields the three alternative models agreed between ~5 and ~35% with experimental measurements, the QMD using the “Frag” option gave the best agreement for lighter fragments but had reduced agreement for larger fragments. For angular distributions INCL++ was seen to provide the best agreement among the models for all elements with themore » exception of Hydrogen, while BIC and QMD was seen to produce broader distributions compared to experiment. BIC and QMD performed similar to one another for kinetic energy distributions while INCL++ suffered from producing lower energy distributions compared to the other models and experiment.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [2];  [8];  [1];  [1]
  1. Univ. of Wollongong (Australia)
  2. INFN, Catania (Italy)
  3. European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva (Switzerland)
  4. CNRS/IN2P3 (France); Univ. Bordeaux (France)
  5. European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva (Switzerland); Tomsk State Univ., Tomsk (Russia)
  6. SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
  7. French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Saclay (France)
  8. INFN, Catania (Italy); National Physical Lab., Middlesex (United Kingdom)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1408204
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-76SF00515
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 869; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0168-9002
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; Geant4; Benchmarking; Heavy ion therapy

Citation Formats

Bolst, David, Cirrone, Giuseppe A. P., Cuttone, Giacomo, Folger, Gunter, Incerti, Sebastien, Ivanchenko, Vladimir, Koi, Tatsumi, Mancusi, Davide, Pandola, Luciano, Romano, Francesco, Rosenfeld, Anatoly B., and Guatelli, Susanna. Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for Heavy Ion Therapy. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2017.06.046.
Bolst, David, Cirrone, Giuseppe A. P., Cuttone, Giacomo, Folger, Gunter, Incerti, Sebastien, Ivanchenko, Vladimir, Koi, Tatsumi, Mancusi, Davide, Pandola, Luciano, Romano, Francesco, Rosenfeld, Anatoly B., & Guatelli, Susanna. Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for Heavy Ion Therapy. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2017.06.046
Bolst, David, Cirrone, Giuseppe A. P., Cuttone, Giacomo, Folger, Gunter, Incerti, Sebastien, Ivanchenko, Vladimir, Koi, Tatsumi, Mancusi, Davide, Pandola, Luciano, Romano, Francesco, Rosenfeld, Anatoly B., and Guatelli, Susanna. Wed . "Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for Heavy Ion Therapy". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2017.06.046. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1408204.
@article{osti_1408204,
title = {Validation of Geant4 fragmentation for Heavy Ion Therapy},
author = {Bolst, David and Cirrone, Giuseppe A. P. and Cuttone, Giacomo and Folger, Gunter and Incerti, Sebastien and Ivanchenko, Vladimir and Koi, Tatsumi and Mancusi, Davide and Pandola, Luciano and Romano, Francesco and Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. and Guatelli, Susanna},
abstractNote = {12C ion therapy has had growing interest in recent years for its excellent dose conformity. However at therapeutic energies, which can be as high as 400 MeV/u, carbon ions produce secondary fragments. For an incident 400 MeV/u 12C ion beam, ~70% of the beam will undergo fragmentation before the Bragg Peak. The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of these fragments must be accurately characterised, as it can result in increasing the risk of secondary cancer for the patient as well as altering the relative biological effectiveness. Here, this work investigates the accuracy of three different nuclear fragmentation models available in the Monte Carlo Toolkit Geant4, the Binary Intranuclear Cascade (BIC), the Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) and the Liege Intranuclear Cascade (INCL++). The models were benchmarked against experimental data for a pristine 400 MeV/u 12C beam incident upon a water phantom, including fragment yield, angular and energy distribution. For fragment yields the three alternative models agreed between ~5 and ~35% with experimental measurements, the QMD using the “Frag” option gave the best agreement for lighter fragments but had reduced agreement for larger fragments. For angular distributions INCL++ was seen to provide the best agreement among the models for all elements with the exception of Hydrogen, while BIC and QMD was seen to produce broader distributions compared to experiment. BIC and QMD performed similar to one another for kinetic energy distributions while INCL++ suffered from producing lower energy distributions compared to the other models and experiment.},
doi = {10.1016/j.nima.2017.06.046},
journal = {Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment},
number = C,
volume = 869,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jul 12 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Wed Jul 12 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 26 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Irradiation System for HIMAC
journal, January 2007

  • Torikoshi, Masami; Minohara, Shinichi; Kanematsu, Nobuyuki
  • Journal of Radiation Research, Vol. 48, Issue Suppl.A
  • DOI: 10.1269/jrr.48.A15

Kill-painting of hypoxic tumours in charged particle therapy
journal, November 2015

  • Tinganelli, Walter; Durante, Marco; Hirayama, Ryoichi
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep17016

Experimental study of nuclear fragmentation of 200 and 400 MeV/ u 12 C ions in water for applications in particle therapy
journal, November 2013


Dose and linear energy transfer distributions of primary and secondary particles in carbon ion radiation therapy: A Monte Carlo simulation study in water
journal, January 2015

  • Johnson, Daniel; Chen, Yong; Ahmad, Salahuddin
  • Journal of Medical Physics, Vol. 40, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.170785

Correction factors to convert microdosimetry measurements in silicon to tissue in 12 C ion therapy
journal, February 2017

  • Bolst, David; Guatelli, Susanna; Tran, Linh T.
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 62, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5de5

Geant4 developments and applications
journal, February 2006

  • Allison, J.; Amako, K.; Apostolakis, J.
  • IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 53, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2006.869826

Geant4—a simulation toolkit
journal, July 2003

  • Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 506, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

Recent developments in Geant4
journal, November 2016

  • Allison, J.; Amako, K.; Apostolakis, J.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 835
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125

Benchmarking nuclear models of FLUKA and GEANT4 for carbon ion therapy
journal, September 2010


Carbon fragmentation measurements and validation of the Geant4 nuclear reaction models for hadrontherapy
journal, November 2012


Benchmarking geant4 nuclear models for hadron therapy with 95 MeV/nucleon carbon ions
journal, May 2014


Geant4 models for simulation of multiple scattering
journal, April 2010


Experimental studies of heavy-ion slowing down in matter
journal, October 2002

  • Geissel, H.; Weick, H.; Scheidenberger, C.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 195, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01311-3

Works referencing / citing this record:

Optimisation of the design of SOI microdosimeters for hadron therapy quality assurance
journal, October 2018


The impact of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium ion imaging
journal, October 2018

  • Volz, Lennart; Piersimoni, Pierluigi; Bashkirov, Vladimir A.
  • Physics in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 63, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aadf25

Comparative study of alternative Geant4 hadronic ion inelastic physics models for prediction of positron-emitting radionuclide production in carbon and oxygen ion therapy
journal, August 2019

  • Chacon, Andrew; Guatelli, Susanna; Rutherford, Harley
  • Physics in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 64, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2752

The impact of sensitive volume thickness for silicon on insulator microdosimeters in hadron therapy
journal, January 2020