Rethinking the Default Construction of Multimodel Climate Ensembles
Abstract
Here, we discuss the current code of practice in the climate sciences to routinely create climate model ensembles as ensembles of opportunity from the newest phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). We give a two-step argument to rethink this process. First, the differences between generations of ensembles corresponding to different CMIP phases in key climate quantities are not large enough to warrant an automatic separation into generational ensembles for CMIP3 and CMIP5. Second, we suggest that climate model ensembles cannot continue to be mere ensembles of opportunity but should always be based on a transparent scientific decision process. If ensembles can be constrained by observation, then they should be constructed as target ensembles that are specifically tailored to a physical question. If model ensembles cannot be constrained by observation, then they should be constructed as cross-generational ensembles, including all available model data to enhance structural model diversity and to better sample the underlying uncertainties. To facilitate this, CMIP should guide the necessarily ongoing process of updating experimental protocols for the evaluation and documentation of coupled models. Finally, with an emphasis on easy access to model data and facilitating the filtering of climate model data across all CMIP generationsmore »
- Authors:
-
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg (Germany)
- Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Earth and Environmental Systems Science Division
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1408078
- Report Number(s):
- LLNL-JRNL-662060
Journal ID: ISSN 0003-0007
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC52-07NA27344
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 96; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 0003-0007
- Publisher:
- American Meteorological Society
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 58 GEOSCIENCES
Citation Formats
Rauser, Florian, Gleckler, Peter, and Marotzke, Jochem. Rethinking the Default Construction of Multimodel Climate Ensembles. United States: N. p., 2015.
Web. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00181.1.
Rauser, Florian, Gleckler, Peter, & Marotzke, Jochem. Rethinking the Default Construction of Multimodel Climate Ensembles. United States. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00181.1
Rauser, Florian, Gleckler, Peter, and Marotzke, Jochem. Tue .
"Rethinking the Default Construction of Multimodel Climate Ensembles". United States. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00181.1. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1408078.
@article{osti_1408078,
title = {Rethinking the Default Construction of Multimodel Climate Ensembles},
author = {Rauser, Florian and Gleckler, Peter and Marotzke, Jochem},
abstractNote = {Here, we discuss the current code of practice in the climate sciences to routinely create climate model ensembles as ensembles of opportunity from the newest phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). We give a two-step argument to rethink this process. First, the differences between generations of ensembles corresponding to different CMIP phases in key climate quantities are not large enough to warrant an automatic separation into generational ensembles for CMIP3 and CMIP5. Second, we suggest that climate model ensembles cannot continue to be mere ensembles of opportunity but should always be based on a transparent scientific decision process. If ensembles can be constrained by observation, then they should be constructed as target ensembles that are specifically tailored to a physical question. If model ensembles cannot be constrained by observation, then they should be constructed as cross-generational ensembles, including all available model data to enhance structural model diversity and to better sample the underlying uncertainties. To facilitate this, CMIP should guide the necessarily ongoing process of updating experimental protocols for the evaluation and documentation of coupled models. Finally, with an emphasis on easy access to model data and facilitating the filtering of climate model data across all CMIP generations and experiments, our community could return to the underlying idea of using model data ensembles to improve uncertainty quantification, evaluation, and cross-institutional exchange.},
doi = {10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00181.1},
journal = {Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society},
number = 6,
volume = 96,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jul 21 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Tue Jul 21 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models: CLIMATE SENSITIVITY IN CMIP5 MODELS
journal, May 2012
- Andrews, Timothy; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Webb, Mark J.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 9
Reliability of the CMIP3 ensemble: RELIABILITY OF CMIP3
journal, January 2010
- Annan, J. D.; Hargreaves, J. C.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 2
Statistical significance of climate sensitivity predictors obtained by data mining
journal, March 2014
- Caldwell, Peter M.; Bretherton, Christopher S.; Zelinka, Mark D.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 5
The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
journal, April 2011
- Dee, D. P.; Uppala, S. M.; Simmons, A. J.
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 656
A Less Cloudy Future: The Role of Subtropical Subsidence in Climate Sensitivity
journal, November 2012
- Fasullo, J. T.; Trenberth, K. E.
- Science, Vol. 338, Issue 6108
Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change
journal, January 2006
- Hall, Alex; Qu, Xin
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, Issue 3
Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis
book, March 2014
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
The end of model democracy?: An editorial comment
journal, January 2010
- Knutti, Reto
- Climatic Change, Vol. 102, Issue 3-4
Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections
journal, October 2012
- Knutti, Reto; Sedláček, Jan
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 4
Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models
journal, May 2010
- Knutti, Reto; Furrer, Reinhard; Tebaldi, Claudia
- Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, Issue 10
Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there: CLIMATE MODEL GENEALOGY
journal, March 2013
- Knutti, Reto; Masson, David; Gettelman, Andrew
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 6
Accuracy of climate change predictions using high resolution simulations as surrogates of truth: ACCURACY OF CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTIONS
journal, March 2011
- Matsueda, Mio; Palmer, T. N.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 5
Climate Model Intercomparisons: Preparing for the Next Phase
journal, March 2014
- Meehl, Gerald A.; Moss, Richard; Taylor, Karl E.
- Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 95, Issue 9
Response of the middle atmosphere to anthropogenic and natural forcings in the CMIP5 simulations with the Max Planck Institute Earth system model: THE MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE OF THE MPI-ESM
journal, March 2013
- Schmidt, H.; Rast, S.; Bunzel, F.
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 1
Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing
journal, January 2014
- Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Dufresne, Jean-Louis
- Nature, Vol. 505, Issue 7481
Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6: ECHAM6
journal, April 2013
- Stevens, Bjorn; Giorgetta, Marco; Esch, Monika
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012
- Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
Works referencing / citing this record:
Evaluation of CMIP5 palaeo-simulations to improve climate projections
journal, July 2015
- Harrison, S. P.; Bartlein, P. J.; Izumi, K.
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 8
Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models
journal, October 2016
- Fischer, E. M.; Knutti, R.
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 11
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organisation
journal, January 2015
- Eyring, V.; Bony, S.; Meehl, G. A.
- Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 8, Issue 12
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
journal, January 2016
- Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A.
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5