DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Assessment of an atmospheric transport model for annual inverse estimates of California greenhouse gas emissions

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric inverse estimates of gas emissions depend on transport model predictions, hence driving a need to assess uncertainties in the transport model. In this study we assess the uncertainty in WRF‐STILT (Weather Research and Forecasting and Stochastic Time‐Inverted Lagrangian Transport) model predictions using a combination of meteorological and carbon monoxide (CO) measurements. WRF configurations were selected to minimize meteorological biases using meteorological measurements of winds and boundary layer depths from surface stations and radar wind profiler sites across California. We compare model predictions with CO measurements from four tower sites in California from June 2013 through May 2014 to assess the seasonal biases and random errors in predicted CO mixing ratios. In general, the seasonal mean biases in boundary layer wind speed (< ~ 0.5 m/s), direction (< ~ 15°), and boundary layer height (< ~ 200 m) were small. However, random errors were large (~1.5–3.0 m/s for wind speed, ~ 40–60° for wind direction, and ~ 300–500 m for boundary layer height). Regression analysis of predicted and measured CO yielded near‐unity slopes (i.e., within 1.0 ± 0.20) for the majority of sites and seasons, though a subset of sites and seasons exhibit larger (~30%) uncertainty, particularly when weak winds combined with complex terrain inmore » the South Central Valley of California. Looking across sites and seasons, these results suggest that WRF‐STILT simulations are sufficient to estimate emissions of CO to up to 15% on annual time scales across California.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [3];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA
  2. California Institute of Technology Pasadena California USA
  3. Department of Chemistry and Air Pollution Research Center University of California Riverside California USA
  4. ESRL, NOAA Boulder Colorado USA
  5. Department of Meteorology and Climate Science San Jose State University San Jose California USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1402342
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐AC02‐05CH11231
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Journal Volume: 122 Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Bagley, Justin E., Jeong, Seongeun, Cui, Xinguang, Newman, Sally, Zhang, Jingsong, Priest, Chad, Campos‐Pineda, Mixtli, Andrews, Arlyn E., Bianco, Laura, Lloyd, Matthew, Lareau, Neil, Clements, Craig, and Fischer, Marc L. Assessment of an atmospheric transport model for annual inverse estimates of California greenhouse gas emissions. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1002/2016JD025361.
Bagley, Justin E., Jeong, Seongeun, Cui, Xinguang, Newman, Sally, Zhang, Jingsong, Priest, Chad, Campos‐Pineda, Mixtli, Andrews, Arlyn E., Bianco, Laura, Lloyd, Matthew, Lareau, Neil, Clements, Craig, & Fischer, Marc L. Assessment of an atmospheric transport model for annual inverse estimates of California greenhouse gas emissions. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025361
Bagley, Justin E., Jeong, Seongeun, Cui, Xinguang, Newman, Sally, Zhang, Jingsong, Priest, Chad, Campos‐Pineda, Mixtli, Andrews, Arlyn E., Bianco, Laura, Lloyd, Matthew, Lareau, Neil, Clements, Craig, and Fischer, Marc L. Thu . "Assessment of an atmospheric transport model for annual inverse estimates of California greenhouse gas emissions". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025361.
@article{osti_1402342,
title = {Assessment of an atmospheric transport model for annual inverse estimates of California greenhouse gas emissions},
author = {Bagley, Justin E. and Jeong, Seongeun and Cui, Xinguang and Newman, Sally and Zhang, Jingsong and Priest, Chad and Campos‐Pineda, Mixtli and Andrews, Arlyn E. and Bianco, Laura and Lloyd, Matthew and Lareau, Neil and Clements, Craig and Fischer, Marc L.},
abstractNote = {Abstract Atmospheric inverse estimates of gas emissions depend on transport model predictions, hence driving a need to assess uncertainties in the transport model. In this study we assess the uncertainty in WRF‐STILT (Weather Research and Forecasting and Stochastic Time‐Inverted Lagrangian Transport) model predictions using a combination of meteorological and carbon monoxide (CO) measurements. WRF configurations were selected to minimize meteorological biases using meteorological measurements of winds and boundary layer depths from surface stations and radar wind profiler sites across California. We compare model predictions with CO measurements from four tower sites in California from June 2013 through May 2014 to assess the seasonal biases and random errors in predicted CO mixing ratios. In general, the seasonal mean biases in boundary layer wind speed (< ~ 0.5 m/s), direction (< ~ 15°), and boundary layer height (< ~ 200 m) were small. However, random errors were large (~1.5–3.0 m/s for wind speed, ~ 40–60° for wind direction, and ~ 300–500 m for boundary layer height). Regression analysis of predicted and measured CO yielded near‐unity slopes (i.e., within 1.0 ± 0.20) for the majority of sites and seasons, though a subset of sites and seasons exhibit larger (~30%) uncertainty, particularly when weak winds combined with complex terrain in the South Central Valley of California. Looking across sites and seasons, these results suggest that WRF‐STILT simulations are sufficient to estimate emissions of CO to up to 15% on annual time scales across California.},
doi = {10.1002/2016JD025361},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = 3,
volume = 122,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Feb 02 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Thu Feb 02 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025361

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

High-resolution simulations of atmospheric CO 2 over complex terrain – representing the Ochsenkopf mountain tall tower
journal, January 2011

  • Pillai, D.; Gerbig, C.; Ahmadov, R.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-7445-2011

Estimating methane emissions from biological and fossil-fuel sources in the San Francisco Bay Area: Methane Emissions in the SF Bay Area
journal, January 2017

  • Jeong, Seongeun; Cui, Xinguang; Blake, Donald R.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL071794

Application of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model for Air Quality Modeling in the San Francisco Bay Area
journal, September 2013

  • Rogers, Raphael E.; Deng, Aijun; Stauffer, David R.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 52, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0280.1

Vertical mixing in atmospheric tracer transport models: error characterization and propagation
journal, January 2008

  • Gerbig, C.; Körner, S.; Lin, J. C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-591-2008

Estimating methane emissions in California's urban and rural regions using multitower observations
journal, November 2016

  • Jeong, Seongeun; Newman, Sally; Zhang, Jingsong
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025404

Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials
journal, December 2009


Coupled weather research and forecasting–stochastic time-inverted lagrangian transport (WRF–STILT) model
journal, May 2010

  • Nehrkorn, Thomas; Eluszkiewicz, Janusz; Wofsy, Steven C.
  • Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Vol. 107, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00703-010-0068-x

Behavior of the Refractive Index Structure Parameter in the Entraining Convective Boundary Layer
journal, July 1980


Biophysical impacts of climate-smart agriculture in the Midwest United States: Biophysical impacts of climate-smart agriculture
journal, January 2015

  • Bagley, Justin E.; Miller, Jesse; Bernacchi, Carl J.
  • Plant, Cell & Environment, Vol. 38, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/pce.12485

Seasonal variation of CH 4 emissions from central California : SEASONAL VARIATION OF CH
journal, June 2012

  • Jeong, Seongeun; Zhao, Chuanfeng; Andrews, Arlyn E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016896

Modeling the Atmospheric Response to Irrigation in the Great Plains. Part I: General Impacts on Precipitation and the Energy Budget
journal, December 2012

  • Harding, Keith J.; Snyder, Peter K.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-11-098.1

North American Regional Reanalysis
journal, March 2006

  • Mesinger, Fedor; DiMego, Geoff; Kalnay, Eugenia
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 87, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343

How significant is the impact of irrigation on the local hydroclimate in California’s Central Valley? Comparison of model results with ground and remote-sensing data
journal, January 2011

  • Sorooshian, Soroosh; Li, Jialun; Hsu, Kuo-lin
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue D6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014775

Diurnal tracking of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions in the Los Angeles basin megacity during spring 2010
journal, January 2013

  • Newman, S.; Jeong, S.; Fischer, M. L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-4359-2013

The Precision and Relative Accuracy of Profiler Wind Measurements
journal, December 1987


A multitower measurement network estimate of California's methane emissions: CALIFORNIA'S METHANE EMISSIONS
journal, October 2013

  • Jeong, Seongeun; Hsu, Ying-Kuang; Andrews, Arlyn E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50854

Irrigation cooling effect: Regional climate forcing by land-use change
journal, January 2007

  • Kueppers, Lara M.; Snyder, Mark A.; Sloan, Lisa C.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006GL028679

WRF Simulations of the Urban Circulation in the Salt Lake City Area for CO 2 Modeling
journal, February 2013

  • Nehrkorn, Thomas; Henderson, John; Leidner, Mark
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 52, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-12-061.1

Effects of global irrigation on the near-surface climate
journal, July 2008

  • Sacks, William J.; Cook, Benjamin I.; Buenning, Nikolaus
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 33, Issue 2-3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-008-0445-z

Meteorological Model Evaluation for CalNex 2010
journal, December 2012

  • Angevine, Wayne M.; Eddington, Lee; Durkee, Kevin
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 140, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00042.1

Quantifying CO emissions from the 2004 Alaskan wildfires using MOPITT CO data
journal, January 2005


Sensitivity of Low-Level Winds Simulated by the WRF Model in California’s Central Valley to Uncertainties in the Large-Scale Forcing and Soil Initialization
journal, December 2008

  • Michelson, Sara A.; Bao, Jian-Wen
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 47, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JAMC1782.1

A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications
journal, March 2008


Observed and WRF-Simulated Low-Level Winds in a High-Ozone Episode during the Central California Ozone Study
journal, September 2008

  • Bao, J-W.; Michelson, S. A.; Persson, P. O. G.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 47, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JAMC1822.1

Atmospheric inverse estimates of methane emissions from Central California
journal, January 2009

  • Zhao, Chuanfeng; Andrews, Arlyn E.; Bianco, Laura
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD011671

The Integrated Surface Database: Recent Developments and Partnerships
journal, June 2011

  • Smith, Adam; Lott, Neal; Vose, Russ
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 92, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011BAMS3015.1

Accounting for the effect of transport errors on tracer inversions
journal, January 2005


Convective Boundary Layer Depth: Improved Measurement by Doppler Radar Wind Profiler Using Fuzzy Logic Methods
journal, November 2002


Uncertainty in Lagrangian pollutant transport simulations due to meteorological uncertainty from a mesoscale WRF ensemble
journal, January 2014

  • Angevine, W. M.; Brioude, J.; McKeen, S.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-2817-2014

Background ozone over the United States in summer: Origin, trend, and contribution to pollution episodes
journal, January 2002


Convective Boundary Layer Depth Estimation from Wind Profilers: Statistical Comparison between an Automated Algorithm and Expert Estimations
journal, August 2008

  • Bianco, Laura; Wilczak, James M.; White, Allen B.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 25, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA981.1

The episodic nature of air pollution transport from Asia to North America
journal, November 2000

  • Yienger, James J.; Galanter, Meredith; Holloway, Tracey A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 105, Issue D22
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900309

Seasonal variations in N 2 O emissions from central California : N
journal, August 2012

  • Jeong, Seongeun; Zhao, Chuanfeng; Andrews, Arlyn E.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052307