DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Incorporating seed fate into plant–frugivore networks increases interaction diversity across plant regeneration stages

Abstract

Plant–animal mutualistic interactions, such as pollination and seed dispersal, affect ecosystem functioning by driving plant population dynamics. However, little is known of how the diversity of interactions in these mutualistic networks determines plant regeneration dynamics. To fill this gap, interaction networks should not only account for the number of seeds dispersed by animals, but also for seed fate after dispersal. Here, we compare plant–animal networks at both the seed dispersal and seedling recruitment stage to evaluate how interaction diversity, represented by different network metrics, changes throughout the process of plant regeneration. We focused on a system with six species of frugivorous birds and three species of fleshy‐fruited trees in the temperate secondary forest of the Cantabrian Range (northern Iberian Peninsula). We considered two plant cohorts corresponding to two fruiting years showing strong differences in fruit and frugivore abundance. Seed dispersal interactions were estimated from a spatially‐explicit, field‐validated model predicting tree and bird species‐specific seed deposition in different microhabitats. These interactions were further transformed into interactions at the seedling recruitment stage by accounting for plant‐ and microhabitat‐specific seed fates estimated from field sampling. We found that network interaction diversity varied across plant regeneration stages and cohorts, both in terms of themore » evenness and the number of paired interactions. Tree–bird interactions were more evenly distributed across species pairs at the recruitment stage than at the seed deposition stage, although some interactions disappeared in the seed‐to‐seedling transition for one plant cohort. The variations in interaction diversity were explained by between‐plant differences in post‐dispersal seed fate and in inter‐annual fruit production, rather than by differences between frugivores in seed deposition patterns. These results highlight the need for integrating plant traits and disperser quality to predict the functional outcome of plant–animal mutualistic networks.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1]
  1. Depto. Biología de Organismos y Sistemas Univ. de Oviedo, and Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Biodiversidad (UMIB, CSIC‐Uo‐PA) ES‐33071 Oviedo Spain
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1401419
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Oikos
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Oikos Journal Volume: 125 Journal Issue: 12; Journal ID: ISSN 0030-1299
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
Denmark
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Donoso, Isabel, García, Daniel, Rodríguez‐Pérez, Javier, and Martínez, Daniel. Incorporating seed fate into plant–frugivore networks increases interaction diversity across plant regeneration stages. Denmark: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1111/oik.02509.
Donoso, Isabel, García, Daniel, Rodríguez‐Pérez, Javier, & Martínez, Daniel. Incorporating seed fate into plant–frugivore networks increases interaction diversity across plant regeneration stages. Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02509
Donoso, Isabel, García, Daniel, Rodríguez‐Pérez, Javier, and Martínez, Daniel. Fri . "Incorporating seed fate into plant–frugivore networks increases interaction diversity across plant regeneration stages". Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02509.
@article{osti_1401419,
title = {Incorporating seed fate into plant–frugivore networks increases interaction diversity across plant regeneration stages},
author = {Donoso, Isabel and García, Daniel and Rodríguez‐Pérez, Javier and Martínez, Daniel},
abstractNote = {Plant–animal mutualistic interactions, such as pollination and seed dispersal, affect ecosystem functioning by driving plant population dynamics. However, little is known of how the diversity of interactions in these mutualistic networks determines plant regeneration dynamics. To fill this gap, interaction networks should not only account for the number of seeds dispersed by animals, but also for seed fate after dispersal. Here, we compare plant–animal networks at both the seed dispersal and seedling recruitment stage to evaluate how interaction diversity, represented by different network metrics, changes throughout the process of plant regeneration. We focused on a system with six species of frugivorous birds and three species of fleshy‐fruited trees in the temperate secondary forest of the Cantabrian Range (northern Iberian Peninsula). We considered two plant cohorts corresponding to two fruiting years showing strong differences in fruit and frugivore abundance. Seed dispersal interactions were estimated from a spatially‐explicit, field‐validated model predicting tree and bird species‐specific seed deposition in different microhabitats. These interactions were further transformed into interactions at the seedling recruitment stage by accounting for plant‐ and microhabitat‐specific seed fates estimated from field sampling. We found that network interaction diversity varied across plant regeneration stages and cohorts, both in terms of the evenness and the number of paired interactions. Tree–bird interactions were more evenly distributed across species pairs at the recruitment stage than at the seed deposition stage, although some interactions disappeared in the seed‐to‐seedling transition for one plant cohort. The variations in interaction diversity were explained by between‐plant differences in post‐dispersal seed fate and in inter‐annual fruit production, rather than by differences between frugivores in seed deposition patterns. These results highlight the need for integrating plant traits and disperser quality to predict the functional outcome of plant–animal mutualistic networks.},
doi = {10.1111/oik.02509},
journal = {Oikos},
number = 12,
volume = 125,
place = {Denmark},
year = {Fri Apr 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Fri Apr 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02509

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 20 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Who dispersed the seeds? The use of DNA barcoding in frugivory and seed dispersal studies
journal, June 2014

  • González-Varo, Juan P.; Arroyo, Juan M.; Jordano, Pedro
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 5, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12212

Seed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review: Tansley review
journal, July 2010


Closing the seed dispersal loop
journal, August 2002


Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity
journal, December 2007


Analysis of a hyper-diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms: Modularity in a seed dispersal network
journal, June 2011


Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes
journal, October 2012

  • Schleuning, Matthias; Fründ, Jochen; Klein, Alexandra-Maria
  • Current Biology, Vol. 22, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.015

Fragmentation patterns and protection of montane forest in the Cantabrian range (NW Spain)
journal, April 2005


Functional heterogeneity in a plant-frugivore assemblage enhances seed dispersal resilience to habitat loss
journal, April 2012


Seed transfer among bird-dispersed trees and its consequences for post-dispersal seed fate
journal, November 2007

  • García, Daniel; Martínez, Isabel; Obeso, José Ramón
  • Basic and Applied Ecology, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2006.11.002

Constant properties of plant–frugivore networks despite fluctuations in fruit and bird communities in space and time
journal, June 2013

  • Plein, Michaela; Längsfeld, Laura; Neuschulz, Eike Lena
  • Ecology, Vol. 94, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1890/12-1213.1

Habitat Characteristics of Forest Fragments Determine Specialisation of Plant-Frugivore Networks in a Mosaic Forest Landscape
journal, January 2013


Functional complementarity and specialisation: The role of biodiversity in plant–pollinator interactions
journal, June 2011


Rodent seed predation promotes differential recruitment among bird-dispersed trees in temperate secondary forests
journal, April 2005


Keystone species in seed dispersal networks are mainly determined by dietary specialization
journal, December 2014

  • Mello, Marco Aurelio Ribeiro; Rodrigues, Francisco Aparecido; Costa, Luciano da Fontoura
  • Oikos, Vol. 124, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1111/oik.01613

Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks
journal, July 2007


Spatial concordance between seed rain and seedling establishment in bird-dispersed trees: does scale matter?
journal, April 2005


Predicting ecosystem functions from biodiversity and mutualistic networks: an extension of trait-based concepts to plant-animal interactions
journal, December 2014

  • Schleuning, Matthias; Fründ, Jochen; García, Daniel
  • Ecography, Vol. 38, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00983

The strength of plant–pollinator interactions
journal, April 2012

  • Vázquez, Diego P.; Lomáscolo, Silvia B.; Maldonado, M. Belén
  • Ecology, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1890/11-1356.1

Network models of frugivory and seed dispersal: Challenges and opportunities
journal, November 2011


Changes in the fruiting landscape relax restrictions on endozoochorous tree dispersal into deforested lands
journal, September 2014

  • Martínez, Daniel; García, Daniel
  • Applied Vegetation Science, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12135

Species abundance and migratory status affects large-scale fruit tracking in thrushes (Turdus spp.)
journal, August 2013

  • Tellería, José L.; Carrascal, Luis M.; Santos, Tomás
  • Journal of Ornithology, Vol. 155, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10336-013-0997-5

Seed Dispersers, Seed Predators, and Browsers Act Synergistically as Biotic Filters in a Mosaic Landscape
journal, September 2014


Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks
journal, February 2009


Seed size and number make contrasting predictions on seed survival and dispersal dynamics: A case study from oil tea Camellia oleifera
journal, May 2015


The temporal dynamics of resource use by frugivorous birds: a network approach
journal, July 2009

  • Carnicer, Jofre; Jordano, Pedro; Melián, Carlos J.
  • Ecology, Vol. 90, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1890/07-1939.1

Frugivore Behavioural Details Matter for Seed Dispersal: A Multi-Species Model for Cantabrian Thrushes and Trees
journal, June 2013