DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Daily environmental conditions determine the competition–facilitation balance for plant water status

Abstract

Summary Plants compete with their neighbours for a finite set of limiting resources, and this decreases individual plant performance, growth and survival. However, neighbouring plants also affect each other in positive ways. Positive facilitative effects can occur when neighbouring plants ameliorate harsh abiotic conditions (temperature, wind and high irradiation). Thus, when environmental conditions are severe, the importance of facilitation may increase. The co‐occurrence and masking effects of competition and facilitation among neighbouring plants have made it difficult to tease them apart in the past. We planted bur oak acorns ( Q uercus macrocarpa ) into an experimental diversity gradient in a central MN grassland that provided a gradient in plant biomass. We predicted that greater biomass of neighbours would increase both competition and facilitation as measured by impacts on the minimum leaf water potential reached on any given day. Under moderate conditions, competition should predominate, but under hot/dry conditions, facilitation should become more important. We measured temperature, humidity and soil moisture in these plots for two growing seasons, as well as oak seedling leaf water potential across a range of daily conditions. On cool/humid days, plant interactions were dominated by competition for soil water: leaf water potentials of juvenile oaksmore » were lower in plots with greater herbaceous biomass (and higher diversity). Conversely, on hot/dry days, facilitation of the microclimate determined the net effect of plants on their neighbours: leaf water potentials of juvenile oaks were higher in plots with higher herbaceous diversity and biomass. Synthesis . In terms of plant water status, plant interactions among neighbours can flip from net negative (competition) to net positive (facilitation) depending on daily abiotic conditions. The relative importance of both positive and negative interactions for plant water status may affect the overall performance of plants over time.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];
  1. Department of Biological Sciences University of Wisconsin‐Milwaukee 3209 N Maryland Ave Milwaukee WI 53201 USA, Biological Sciences Bard College Annandale‐on‐Hudson NY 12504
  2. Department of Biological Sciences University of Wisconsin‐Milwaukee 3209 N Maryland Ave Milwaukee WI 53201 USA
  3. Department of Forest Resources University of Minnesota, 1530 Cleveland Ave. N St. Paul MN USA, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment University of Western Sydney Penrith NSW 2751 Australia
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1400900
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Ecology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Ecology Journal Volume: 103 Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0022-0477
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Wright, Alexandra, Schnitzer, Stefan A., Reich, Peter B., and Jones, ed., Robert. Daily environmental conditions determine the competition–facilitation balance for plant water status. United Kingdom: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12397.
Wright, Alexandra, Schnitzer, Stefan A., Reich, Peter B., & Jones, ed., Robert. Daily environmental conditions determine the competition–facilitation balance for plant water status. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12397
Wright, Alexandra, Schnitzer, Stefan A., Reich, Peter B., and Jones, ed., Robert. Mon . "Daily environmental conditions determine the competition–facilitation balance for plant water status". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12397.
@article{osti_1400900,
title = {Daily environmental conditions determine the competition–facilitation balance for plant water status},
author = {Wright, Alexandra and Schnitzer, Stefan A. and Reich, Peter B. and Jones, ed., Robert},
abstractNote = {Summary Plants compete with their neighbours for a finite set of limiting resources, and this decreases individual plant performance, growth and survival. However, neighbouring plants also affect each other in positive ways. Positive facilitative effects can occur when neighbouring plants ameliorate harsh abiotic conditions (temperature, wind and high irradiation). Thus, when environmental conditions are severe, the importance of facilitation may increase. The co‐occurrence and masking effects of competition and facilitation among neighbouring plants have made it difficult to tease them apart in the past. We planted bur oak acorns ( Q uercus macrocarpa ) into an experimental diversity gradient in a central MN grassland that provided a gradient in plant biomass. We predicted that greater biomass of neighbours would increase both competition and facilitation as measured by impacts on the minimum leaf water potential reached on any given day. Under moderate conditions, competition should predominate, but under hot/dry conditions, facilitation should become more important. We measured temperature, humidity and soil moisture in these plots for two growing seasons, as well as oak seedling leaf water potential across a range of daily conditions. On cool/humid days, plant interactions were dominated by competition for soil water: leaf water potentials of juvenile oaks were lower in plots with greater herbaceous biomass (and higher diversity). Conversely, on hot/dry days, facilitation of the microclimate determined the net effect of plants on their neighbours: leaf water potentials of juvenile oaks were higher in plots with higher herbaceous diversity and biomass. Synthesis . In terms of plant water status, plant interactions among neighbours can flip from net negative (competition) to net positive (facilitation) depending on daily abiotic conditions. The relative importance of both positive and negative interactions for plant water status may affect the overall performance of plants over time.},
doi = {10.1111/1365-2745.12397},
journal = {Journal of Ecology},
number = 3,
volume = 103,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Mon Mar 30 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Mon Mar 30 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12397

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 46 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Water Stress Induced Alterations of the Stomatal Response to Decreases in Leaf Water Potential
journal, May 1976


Positive interactions in communities
journal, May 1994


Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress
journal, January 2013

  • He, Qiang; Bertness, Mark D.; Altieri, Andrew H.
  • Ecology Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/ele.12080

Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass-a facultative mutualism
journal, January 2001


An Analysis of Competitive Ability in Three Perennial Grasses
journal, September 1976


Species-specificity of nurse plants for the establishment, survivorship, and growth of a columnar cactus
journal, August 2010

  • Landero, Juan Pablo Castillo; Valiente-Banuet, Alfonso
  • American Journal of Botany, Vol. 97, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000088

A field test of the stress-gradient hypothesis along an aridity gradient: Facilitation and the stress-gradient hypothesis
journal, May 2011


Untangling positive and negative biotic interactions: views from above and below ground in a forest ecosystem
journal, December 2010

  • Montgomery, Rebecca A.; Reich, Peter B.; Palik, Brian J.
  • Ecology, Vol. 91, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1890/09-1663.1

Competition for soil water between annual plants and blue oak (Quercus douglasii) seedlings
journal, June 1989

  • Gordon, D. R.; Menke, J. M.; Rice, K. J.
  • Oecologia, Vol. 79, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00378672

Positive effect of shade on plant growth: amelioration of stress or active regulation of growth rate?: Effects of shade on plant growth
journal, December 2011


Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems
journal, February 1996

  • Tilman, David; Wedin, David; Knops, Johannes
  • Nature, Vol. 379, Issue 6567
  • DOI: 10.1038/379718a0

Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition
journal, April 2001

  • Reich, Peter B.; Knops, Jean; Tilman, David
  • Nature, Vol. 410, Issue 6830
  • DOI: 10.1038/35071062

The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
journal, November 2004


Relative Humidity or Vapor Pressure Deficit
journal, April 1936


Survival, growth, and photosynthesis of tree seedlings competing with herbaceous vegetation along a water-light-nitrogen gradient
journal, December 1999

  • Davis, Mark A.; Wrage, Keith J.; Reich, Peter B.
  • Plant Ecology, Vol. 145, Issue 2, p. 341-350
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1009802211896

Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach
journal, March 1977


Elevated CO2 stimulates grassland soil respiration by increasing carbon inputs rather than by enhancing soil moisture
journal, July 2011


Abiotic Stress and the Relative Importance of Interference and Facilitation in Montane Bunchgrass Communities in Western Montana
journal, August 1996

  • Greenlee, John T.; Callaway, Ragan M.
  • The American Naturalist, Vol. 148, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/285931

The Competitive Exclusion Principle
journal, April 1960


Mutualism, Facilitation, and the Structure of Ecological Communities
journal, January 2001


Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future
journal, September 2007


Living close to your neighbors: the importance of both competition and facilitation in plant communities
journal, August 2014

  • Wright, Alexandra; Schnitzer, Stefan A.; Reich, Peter B.
  • Ecology, Vol. 95, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1890/13-1855.1

Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory
journal, March 2003


Testing the Link between Functional Diversity and Ecosystem Functioning in a Minnesota Grassland Experiment
journal, December 2012


Facilitation of Quercus ilex in Mediterranean shrubland is explained by both direct and indirect interactions mediated by herbs
journal, May 2010


Intraspecific competitive effects on water relations, growth and reproduction in Encelia farinosa
journal, January 1984


Effect of Shrubs on Recruitment of Quercus Douglasii and Quercus Lobata in California
journal, December 1992


Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue-specific differences in hydraulic conductance: Stomatal sensitivity of C3 and C4 grasses
journal, June 2013

  • Ocheltree, T. W.; Nippert, J. B.; Prasad, P. V. V.
  • Plant, Cell & Environment, Vol. 37, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/pce.12137

Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades
journal, May 2012