DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty quantification of property models: Methodology and its application to CO 2 ‐loaded aqueous MEA solutions

Abstract

Uncertainties in property models can significantly affect the results obtained from process simulations. If these uncertainties are not quantified, optimal plant designs based on such models can be misleading. With this incentive, a systematic, generalized uncertainty quantification (UQ) methodology for property models is developed. Starting with prior beliefs about parametric uncertainties, a Bayesian method is used to derive informed posteriors using the experimental data. To reduce the computational expense, surrogate response surface models are developed. For downselecting the parameter space, a sensitivity matrix‐based approach is developed. The methodology is then deployed to the property models for an MEA‐CO 2 ‐H 2 O system. The UQ analysis is found to provide interesting information about uncertainties in the parameter space. The sensitivity matrix approach is also found to be a valuable tool for reducing computational expense. Finally, the effect of the estimated parametric uncertainty on CO 2 absorption and monoethanolamine (MEA) regeneration is analyzed. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 1822–1839, 2015

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Dept. of Chemical Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown WV 26505
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA 94550
  3. National Energy Technology Laboratory Pittsburgh PA 15236
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1400444
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
AIChE Journal
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: AIChE Journal Journal Volume: 61 Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 0001-1541
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Morgan, Joshua C., Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, Tong, Charles, and Miller, David C. Uncertainty quantification of property models: Methodology and its application to CO 2 ‐loaded aqueous MEA solutions. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1002/aic.14762.
Morgan, Joshua C., Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, Tong, Charles, & Miller, David C. Uncertainty quantification of property models: Methodology and its application to CO 2 ‐loaded aqueous MEA solutions. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14762
Morgan, Joshua C., Bhattacharyya, Debangsu, Tong, Charles, and Miller, David C. Mon . "Uncertainty quantification of property models: Methodology and its application to CO 2 ‐loaded aqueous MEA solutions". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14762.
@article{osti_1400444,
title = {Uncertainty quantification of property models: Methodology and its application to CO 2 ‐loaded aqueous MEA solutions},
author = {Morgan, Joshua C. and Bhattacharyya, Debangsu and Tong, Charles and Miller, David C.},
abstractNote = {Uncertainties in property models can significantly affect the results obtained from process simulations. If these uncertainties are not quantified, optimal plant designs based on such models can be misleading. With this incentive, a systematic, generalized uncertainty quantification (UQ) methodology for property models is developed. Starting with prior beliefs about parametric uncertainties, a Bayesian method is used to derive informed posteriors using the experimental data. To reduce the computational expense, surrogate response surface models are developed. For downselecting the parameter space, a sensitivity matrix‐based approach is developed. The methodology is then deployed to the property models for an MEA‐CO 2 ‐H 2 O system. The UQ analysis is found to provide interesting information about uncertainties in the parameter space. The sensitivity matrix approach is also found to be a valuable tool for reducing computational expense. Finally, the effect of the estimated parametric uncertainty on CO 2 absorption and monoethanolamine (MEA) regeneration is analyzed. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 1822–1839, 2015},
doi = {10.1002/aic.14762},
journal = {AIChE Journal},
number = 6,
volume = 61,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Mar 09 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Mon Mar 09 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14762

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 26 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Density and Viscosity of Some Partially Carbonated Aqueous Alkanolamine Solutions and Their Blends
journal, May 1998

  • Weiland, Ralph H.; Dingman, John C.; Cronin, D. Benjamin
  • Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 43, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/je9702044

Review of Mass-Transfer Correlations for Packed Columns*
journal, November 2005

  • Wang, G. Q.; Yuan, X. G.; Yu, K. T.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 44, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie050017w

Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
journal, March 1991


Effects of thermophysical property estimation on process design
journal, January 1977


Surface Tension Models for Aqueous Amine Blends
journal, August 2005

  • Asprion, Norbert
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 44, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie0504405

Application of uncertainty quantification methods for coal devolatilization kinetics in gasifier modeling
journal, October 2014


Sensitivity of Process Design to Phase Equilibrium—A New Perturbation Method Based Upon the Margules Equation
journal, October 2013

  • Mathias, Paul M.
  • Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 59, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/je400748p

Dependence of surface tension on composition of binary aqueous-organic solutions
journal, February 1989

  • Connors, Kenneth A.; Wright, James L.
  • Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 61, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/ac00178a001

Guidelines for reporting of phase equilibrium measurements (IUPAC Recommendations 2012)
journal, April 2012

  • Chirico, Robert D.; de Loos, Theodoor W.; Gmehling, Jürgen
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 84, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REC-11-05-02

Validation and Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Model
journal, March 2013

  • Gel, Aytekin; Li, Tingwen; Gopalan, Balaji
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 52, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie303469f

Densities and Surface Tensions of CO 2 Loaded Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solutions with r = (0.2 to 0.7) at T = (303.15 to 333.15) K
journal, March 2013

  • Jayarathna, Sanoja A.; Weerasooriya, Achini; Dayarathna, Sithara
  • Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 58, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/je301279x

Carbon Capture Simulation Initiative: A Case Study in Multiscale Modeling and New Challenges
journal, June 2014


Aqueous piperazine derivatives for CO2 capture: Accurate screening by a wetted wall column
journal, September 2011


Density of Water (1) + Monoethanolamine (2) + CO 2 (3) from (298.15 to 413.15) K and Surface Tension of Water (1) + Monoethanolamine (2) from (303.15 to 333.15) K
journal, March 2012

  • Han, Jingyi; Jin, Jing; Eimer, Dag A.
  • Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 57, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/je2010038

Numerical modeling and uncertainty quantification of a bubbling fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tubes
journal, February 2014


Bayesian calibration of thermodynamic models for the uptake of CO2 in supported amine sorbents using ab initio priors
journal, January 2013

  • Mebane, David S.; Bhat, K. Sham; Kress, Joel D.
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3cp42963f

Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: A high performance computing framework
journal, October 2012

  • Angelikopoulos, Panagiotis; Papadimitriou, Costas; Koumoutsakos, Petros
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 137, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4757266

Density and Viscosity of Monoethanolamine + Water + Carbon Dioxide from (25 to 80) °C
journal, November 2009

  • Amundsen, Trine G.; Øi, Lars E.; Eimer, Dag A.
  • Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 54, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/je900188m