DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity

Abstract

The surface land use of fossil fuel acquisition and utilization has not been well characterized, inhibiting consistent comparisons of different electricity generation technologies. We present a method for robust estimation of the life cycle land use of electricity generated from natural gas through a case study that includes inventories of infrastructure, satellite imagery and well-level production. Approximately 500 sites in the Barnett Shale of Texas were sampled across five life cycle stages (production, gathering, processing, transmission and power generation). Total land use (0.62 m2 MWh-1, 95% confidence intervals +/-0.01 m2 MWh-1) was dominated by midstream infrastructure, particularly pipelines (74%). These results were sensitive to power plant heat rate (85-190% of the base case), facility lifetime (89-169%), number of wells per site (16-100%), well lifetime (92-154%) and pipeline right of way (58-142%). When replicated for other gas-producing regions and different fuels, our approach offers a route to enable empirically grounded comparisons of the land footprint of energy choices.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [2]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [2];  [2];  [3]
  1. Johns Hopkins Univ., Washington, DC (United States). School of Advanced International Studies; Univ. of Calgary, AB (Canada)
  2. Joint Inst. for Strategic Energy Analysis, Golden, CO (United States); National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States). Strategic Energy Analysis Center
  3. Univ. of Calgary, AB (Canada)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis
OSTI Identifier:
1398873
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-6A20-66274
Journal ID: ISSN 2058-7546
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nature Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 2; Journal Issue: 10; Journal ID: ISSN 2058-7546
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
03 NATURAL GAS; life cycle assessment; land-use; estimated ultimate recovery; shale gas

Citation Formats

Jordaan, Sarah M., Heath, Garvin A., Macknick, Jordan, Bush, Brian W., Mohammadi, Ehsan, Ben-Horin, Dan, Urrea, Victoria, and Marceau, Danielle. Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0004-0.
Jordaan, Sarah M., Heath, Garvin A., Macknick, Jordan, Bush, Brian W., Mohammadi, Ehsan, Ben-Horin, Dan, Urrea, Victoria, & Marceau, Danielle. Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity. United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0004-0
Jordaan, Sarah M., Heath, Garvin A., Macknick, Jordan, Bush, Brian W., Mohammadi, Ehsan, Ben-Horin, Dan, Urrea, Victoria, and Marceau, Danielle. Mon . "Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity". United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0004-0. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1398873.
@article{osti_1398873,
title = {Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity},
author = {Jordaan, Sarah M. and Heath, Garvin A. and Macknick, Jordan and Bush, Brian W. and Mohammadi, Ehsan and Ben-Horin, Dan and Urrea, Victoria and Marceau, Danielle},
abstractNote = {The surface land use of fossil fuel acquisition and utilization has not been well characterized, inhibiting consistent comparisons of different electricity generation technologies. We present a method for robust estimation of the life cycle land use of electricity generated from natural gas through a case study that includes inventories of infrastructure, satellite imagery and well-level production. Approximately 500 sites in the Barnett Shale of Texas were sampled across five life cycle stages (production, gathering, processing, transmission and power generation). Total land use (0.62 m2 MWh-1, 95% confidence intervals +/-0.01 m2 MWh-1) was dominated by midstream infrastructure, particularly pipelines (74%). These results were sensitive to power plant heat rate (85-190% of the base case), facility lifetime (89-169%), number of wells per site (16-100%), well lifetime (92-154%) and pipeline right of way (58-142%). When replicated for other gas-producing regions and different fuels, our approach offers a route to enable empirically grounded comparisons of the land footprint of energy choices.},
doi = {10.1038/s41560-017-0004-0},
journal = {Nature Energy},
number = 10,
volume = 2,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Oct 02 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Mon Oct 02 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 21 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Uncertainty in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from United States Natural Gas End-Uses and its Effects on Policy
journal, October 2011

  • Venkatesh, Aranya; Jaramillo, Paulina; Griffin, W. Michael
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/es200930h

Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp)
journal, June 2006

  • Milà i. Canals, Llorenç; Bauer, Christian; Depestele, Jochen
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1065/lca2006.05.250

Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach
journal, April 2012

  • de Baan, Laura; Alkemade, Rob; Koellner, Thomas
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0412-0

Land use and electricity generation: A life-cycle analysis
journal, August 2009

  • Fthenakis, Vasilis; Kim, Hyung Chul
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 6-7
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.017

Source and Fate of Hydraulic Fracturing Water in the Barnett Shale: A Historical Perspective
journal, February 2014

  • Nicot, Jean-Philippe; Scanlon, Bridget R.; Reedy, Robert C.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es404050r

Review of land use impact methodologies
journal, August 2000


Impacts from Above-Ground Activities in the Eagle Ford Shale Play on Landscapes and Hydrologic Flows, La Salle County, Texas
journal, May 2015

  • Pierre, Jon Paul; Abolt, Charles J.; Young, Michael H.
  • Environmental Management, Vol. 55, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0492-2

UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA
journal, May 2013

  • Koellner, Thomas; de Baan, Laura; Beck, Tabea
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0579-z

From the Cover: Cozzarelli Prize Winner: Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory
journal, November 2013

  • Patzek, T. W.; Male, F.; Marder, M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 49
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313380110

Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S.
journal, March 2012

  • Nicot, Jean-Philippe; Scanlon, Bridget R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es204602t

Land-Use Requirements for Solar Power Plants in the United States
report, June 2013


On the sampling system with probability proportionate to sum of sizes
journal, December 1951

  • Midzuno, Hiroshi
  • Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02949779

Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Shale Gas: Review of Evidence and Implications
journal, May 2012

  • Weber, Christopher L.; Clavin, Christopher
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/es300375n

Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum
journal, December 2011

  • Burnham, Andrew; Han, Jeongwoo; Clark, Corrie E.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/es201942m

Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems
journal, February 2014


Estimation of the population mean when the coefficient of variation is known: Estimation of the population mean
journal, January 1978


Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations: A letter
journal, April 2011


Methods of estimating shale gas resources – Comparison, evaluation and implications
journal, September 2013


Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas
journal, July 2011


Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective
journal, April 2009


Life Cycle Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation Impacts of a Marcellus Shale Gas Well
journal, January 2014

  • Jiang, Mohan; Hendrickson, Chris T.; VanBriesen, Jeanne M.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/es4047654

Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment
journal, June 2014


Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
journal, November 2012


Gas-Reserves Estimation in Resource Plays
journal, October 2010

  • Lee, W. John; Sidle, Rod
  • SPE Economics & Management, Vol. 2, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.2118/130102-PA

Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production
journal, December 2011

  • Stephenson, Trevor; Valle, Jose Eduardo; Riera-Palou, Xavier
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1021/es2024115

Land use indicators in life cycle assessment. Case study: The environmental impact of Mediterranean greenhouses
journal, January 2007


Expert Workshop on Land Use Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment. 12–13 June 2006 Guildford, Surrey (UK)
journal, September 2006

  • Milà i. Canals, Llorenç; Clift, Roland; Basson, Lauren
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1065/lca2006.08.262

The impact of off-site land use energy intensity on the overall life cycle land use energy intensity for utility-scale solar electricity generation technologies
journal, May 2015

  • Murphy, David J.; Horner, Robert M.; Clark, Corrie E.
  • Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4921650

A Retrospective Review of Shale Gas Development in the United States: What Led to the Boom?
journal, January 2013


Understanding the Applicability and Economic Viability of Refracturing Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Plays
conference, February 2016

  • Lindsay, G. J.; White, D. J.; Miller, G. A.
  • SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference
  • DOI: 10.2118/179113-MS

Páginas preliminares Revista EIA
journal, November 2018


The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory
book, January 1978

  • Moré, Jorge J.; Watson, G. A.
  • Numerical Analysis, Vol. 630, p. 105-116
  • DOI: 10.1007/BFb0067700

Works referencing / citing this record:

Comparison of Recent Oil and Gas, Wind Energy, and Other Anthropogenic Landscape Alteration Factors in Texas Through 2014
journal, March 2018

  • Pierre, Jon Paul; Wolaver, Brad D.; Labay, Benjamin J.
  • Environmental Management, Vol. 61, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1000-2

Environmental life cycle assessment of Mediterranean tomato: case study of a Tunisian soilless geothermal multi-tunnel greenhouse
journal, January 2020

  • Maaoui, Mariem; Boukchina, Rachid; Hajjaji, Noureddine
  • Environment, Development and Sustainability
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00618-z

An approach for evaluating changes in land-use from energy sprawl and other anthropogenic activities with implications for biotic resource management
journal, February 2018

  • Wolaver, Brad D.; Pierre, Jon Paul; Labay, Benjamin J.
  • Environmental Earth Sciences, Vol. 77, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12665-018-7323-8

The Water‐Energy Nexus of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Global Hydrologic Analysis for Shale Oil and Gas Extraction
text, January 2018

  • Rosa, Lorenzo; Cristina Rulli, Maria; Davis, Kyle Frankel
  • Columbia University
  • DOI: 10.7916/d8-kq7f-rp32