Comment on “Nonidentical protons”

Arrington, J.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039801

Title: Comment on “Nonidentical protons”

Abstract

Here, the authors claim that averaging over an ensemble of protons with different sizes yields a significantly smaller radius when examining electron scattering data.

Authors:

Arrington, J. ^[1]

Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Publication Date:: Tue Mar 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016

Research Org.:: Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)

OSTI Identifier:: 1391927

Alternate Identifier(s):: OSTI ID: 1244306; OSTI ID: 1830315

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-06CH11357; AC02-05CH11231

Resource Type:: Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: Physical Review C

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Volume: 93; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 2469-9985

Publisher:: American Physical Society (APS)

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; nuclear matter; protons; electric moment

Citation Formats


                    Arrington, J. Comment on “Nonidentical protons”.  United States: N. p., 2016. 
Web.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039801.

Copy to clipboard


                    Arrington, J. Comment on “Nonidentical protons”.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039801

Copy to clipboard


                    Arrington, J. Tue .  
"Comment on “Nonidentical protons”".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039801.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1391927.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1391927,

  title        = {Comment on “Nonidentical protons”},

  author       = {Arrington, J.},

  abstractNote = {Here, the authors claim that averaging over an ensemble of protons with different sizes yields a significantly smaller radius when examining electron scattering data.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039801},

  journal      = {Physical Review C},

  number       = 3,

  volume       = 93,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Tue Mar 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016},

  month        = {Tue Mar 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Publisher's Version of Record

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039801

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 2 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Works referenced in this record:

High-Precision Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of the Proton
journal, December 2010

Bernauer, J. C.; Achenbach, P.; Ayerbe Gayoso, C.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 105, Issue 24
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.242001

High-precision measurement of the proton elastic form factor ratio <mml:math altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll" xmlns:xocs="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/xocs/dtd" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" xmlns:ja="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:tb="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/table/dtd" xmlns:sb="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/struct-bib/dtd" xmlns:ce="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/dtd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:cals="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/cals/dtd"><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> at low <mml:math altimg="si2.gif" overflow="scroll" xmlns:xocs="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/xocs/dtd" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" xmlns:ja="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/ja/dtd" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:tb="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/table/dtd" xmlns:sb="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/struct-bib/dtd" xmlns:ce="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/dtd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:cals="http://www.elsevier.com/xml/common/cals/dtd"><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>
journal, November 2011

Zhan, X.; Allada, K.; Armstrong, D. S.
Physics Letters B, Vol. 705, Issue 1-2
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.10.002

Comment on “Nonidentical protons”
journal, November 2013

Downie, E. J.; Briscoe, W. J.; Gilman, R.
Physical Review C, Vol. 88, Issue 5
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.059801

Proton Structure from the Measurement of 2S-2P Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen
journal, January 2013

Antognini, A.; Nez, F.; Schuhmann, K.
Science, Vol. 339, Issue 6118
DOI: 10.1126/science.1230016

An Examination of Proton Charge Radius Extractions from e–p Scattering Data
journal, September 2015

Arrington, John
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Vol. 44, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922414

Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data
journal, July 2015

Lee, Gabriel; Arrington, John R.; Hill, Richard J.
Physical Review D, Vol. 92, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.013013

Nonidentical protons
journal, February 2013

Mart, T.; Sulaksono, A.
Physical Review C, Vol. 87, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.025807

The size of the proton
journal, July 2010

Pohl, Randolf; Antognini, Aldo; Nez, François
Nature, Vol. 466, Issue 7303
DOI: 10.1038/nature09250

Evaluation of the Proton Charge Radius from Electron–Proton Scattering
journal, September 2015

Arrington, John; Sick, Ingo
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Vol. 44, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1063/1.4921430

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

A High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius at JLab

Thesis/Dissertation

The elastic electron-proton (e-p) scattering and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two traditional methods to determine the proton charge radius (r_p). In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen (µH)¹ spectroscopy reported a r_p result that was nearly ten times more precise but significantly smaller than the values from the compilation of all previous r_p measurements. This discrepancy is often referred to as the "proton charge radius puzzle". In order to investigate the puzzle, the PRad experiment (E12-11-106) was first proposed in 2011 and performed in 2016 in Hall B at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, withmore »« less
Full Text Available
Are protons nonidentical fermions?

Journal Article Mart, T., E-mail: tmart@fisika.ui.ac.id - AIP Conference Proceedings

We briefly review the progress of our investigation on the electric (charge) radius of the proton. In order to explain the recently measured proton radius, which is significantly smaller than the standard CODATA value, we assume that the real protons radii are not identical, they are randomly distributed in a certain range. To obtain the measured radius we average the radii and fit both the mean radius and the range. By using an averaged dipole form factor we obtain the charge radius r{sub E} = 0.8333 fm, in accordance with the recent measurement of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4897090
Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data

Journal Article Lee, Gabriel ; Arrington, John R. ; Hill, Richard J. - Physical Review. D, Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

We perform a new analysis of electron-proton scattering data to determine the proton electric and magnetic radii, enforcing model-independent constraints from form factor analyticity. A wide-ranging study of possible systematic effects is performed. An improved analysis is developed that rebins data taken at identical kinematic settings and avoids a scaling assumption of systematic errors with statistical errors. Employing standard models for radiative corrections, our improved analysis of the 2010 Mainz A1 Collaboration data yields a proton electric radius r_E = 0.895(20) fm and magnetic radius r_M = 0.776(38) fm. A similar analysis applied to world data (excluding Mainz data) impliesmore »« less
Cited by 89
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.013013

Full Text Available
A small proton charge radius from an electron–proton scattering experiment

Journal Article Xiong, W. ; Gasparian, A. ; Gao, H. ; ... - Nature (London)

Elastic electron–proton scattering (e–p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, rp. In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen atoms1 found a substantial discrepancy 2 comparedwithpreviousresults ,whichbecameknownasthe‘protonradiuspuzzle’. Despite experimental and theoretical efforts, the puzzle remains unresolved. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic measurements 3,4 conducted on ordinary hydrogen . Here we report on the proton charge radius experiment at Jefferson Laboratory (PRad), a high-precision e–p experiment that was established after the discrepancy was identified. We used a magnetic-spectrometer- free method along withmore »« less
Cited by 134
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2

Full Text Available
Flavor decomposition of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors at low $Q^{2}$

Journal Article Qattan, I. A. ; Arrington, J. ; Alsaad, A. - Physical Review. C, Nuclear Physics

Background: The spatial distribution of charge and magnetization within the proton is encoded in the elastic form factors. These have been precisely measured in elastic electron scattering, and the combination of proton and neutron form factors allows for the separation of the up- and down-quark contributions. Purpose: In this work, we extract the proton and neutron form factors from worldwide data with an emphasis on precise new data covering the low-momentum region, which is sensitive to the large-scale structure of the nucleon. From these, we separate the up- and down-quark contributions to the proton form factors. Method: We combine crossmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.065203

Similar Records

Title: Comment on “Nonidentical protons”

Abstract

Citation Formats

High-Precision Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of the Proton journal, December 2010

Comment on “Nonidentical protons” journal, November 2013

Proton Structure from the Measurement of 2S-2P Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen journal, January 2013

An Examination of Proton Charge Radius Extractions from e–p Scattering Data journal, September 2015

Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data journal, July 2015

Nonidentical protons journal, February 2013

The size of the proton journal, July 2010

Evaluation of the Proton Charge Radius from Electron–Proton Scattering journal, September 2015

High-Precision Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of the Proton
journal, December 2010

Comment on “Nonidentical protons”
journal, November 2013

Proton Structure from the Measurement of 2S-2P Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen
journal, January 2013

An Examination of Proton Charge Radius Extractions from e–p Scattering Data
journal, September 2015

Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data
journal, July 2015

Nonidentical protons
journal, February 2013

The size of the proton
journal, July 2010

Evaluation of the Proton Charge Radius from Electron–Proton Scattering
journal, September 2015