skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels

Abstract

Purpose: Bioenergy is increasingly used to help meet greenhouse gas (GHG) and renewable energy targets. However, bioenergy’s sustainability has been questioned, resulting in increasing use of life cycle assessment (LCA). Bioenergy systems are global and complex, and market forces can result in significant changes, relevant to LCA and policy. The goal of this paper is to illustrate the complexities associated with LCA, with particular focus on bioenergy and associated policy development, so that its use can more effectively inform policymakers. Methods: The review is based on the results from a series of workshops focused on bioenergy life cycle assessment. Expert submissions were compiled and categorized within the first two workshops. Over 100 issues emerged. Accounting for redundancies and close similarities in the list, this reduced to around 60 challenges, many of which are deeply interrelated. Some of these issues were then explored further at a policy-facing workshop in London, UK. The authors applied a rigorous approach to categorize the challenges identified to be at the intersection of biofuels/bioenergy LCA and policy. Results and discussion: The credibility of LCA is core to its use in policy. Even LCAs that comply with ISO standards and policy and regulatory instruments leave a greatmore » deal of scope for interpretation and flexibility. Within the bioenergy sector, this has led to frustration and at times a lack of obvious direction. This paper identifies the main challenge clusters: overarching issues, application and practice and value and ethical judgments. Many of these are reflective of the transition from application of LCA to assess individual products or systems to the wider approach that is becoming more common. Uncertainty in impact assessment strongly influences planning and compliance due to challenges in assigning accountability, and communicating the inherent complexity and uncertainty within bioenergy is becoming of greater importance. Conclusions: The emergence of LCA in bioenergy governance is particularly significant because other sectors are likely to transition to similar governance models. LCA is being stretched to accommodate complex and broad policy-relevant questions, seeking to incorporate externalities that have major implications for long-term sustainability. As policy increasingly relies on LCA, the strains placed on the methodology are becoming both clearer and impedimentary. The implications for energy policy, and in particular bioenergy, are large.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [3];  [7]
  1. Univ. of Bath (United Kingdom)
  2. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. Univ. of Nottingham (United Kingdom)
  4. Univ. of Bath (United Kingdom); Rothamstead Research, Harpenden (United Kingdom)
  5. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  6. Univ. of Bath (United Kingdom); Univ. College London (United Kingdom)
  7. Idaho Public Utilities Commission, Boise, ID (United States); Energy Biosciences Inst., Berkely, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1378590
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 20; Journal Issue: 10; Journal ID: ISSN 0948-3349
Publisher:
Springer
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS

Citation Formats

McManus, Marcelle C., Taylor, Caroline M., Mohr, Alison, Whittaker, Carly, Scown, Corinne D., Borrion, Aiduan Li, Glithero, Neryssa J., and Yin, Yao. Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0930-7.
McManus, Marcelle C., Taylor, Caroline M., Mohr, Alison, Whittaker, Carly, Scown, Corinne D., Borrion, Aiduan Li, Glithero, Neryssa J., & Yin, Yao. Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels. United States. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0930-7.
McManus, Marcelle C., Taylor, Caroline M., Mohr, Alison, Whittaker, Carly, Scown, Corinne D., Borrion, Aiduan Li, Glithero, Neryssa J., and Yin, Yao. Fri . "Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels". United States. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0930-7. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1378590.
@article{osti_1378590,
title = {Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels},
author = {McManus, Marcelle C. and Taylor, Caroline M. and Mohr, Alison and Whittaker, Carly and Scown, Corinne D. and Borrion, Aiduan Li and Glithero, Neryssa J. and Yin, Yao},
abstractNote = {Purpose: Bioenergy is increasingly used to help meet greenhouse gas (GHG) and renewable energy targets. However, bioenergy’s sustainability has been questioned, resulting in increasing use of life cycle assessment (LCA). Bioenergy systems are global and complex, and market forces can result in significant changes, relevant to LCA and policy. The goal of this paper is to illustrate the complexities associated with LCA, with particular focus on bioenergy and associated policy development, so that its use can more effectively inform policymakers. Methods: The review is based on the results from a series of workshops focused on bioenergy life cycle assessment. Expert submissions were compiled and categorized within the first two workshops. Over 100 issues emerged. Accounting for redundancies and close similarities in the list, this reduced to around 60 challenges, many of which are deeply interrelated. Some of these issues were then explored further at a policy-facing workshop in London, UK. The authors applied a rigorous approach to categorize the challenges identified to be at the intersection of biofuels/bioenergy LCA and policy. Results and discussion: The credibility of LCA is core to its use in policy. Even LCAs that comply with ISO standards and policy and regulatory instruments leave a great deal of scope for interpretation and flexibility. Within the bioenergy sector, this has led to frustration and at times a lack of obvious direction. This paper identifies the main challenge clusters: overarching issues, application and practice and value and ethical judgments. Many of these are reflective of the transition from application of LCA to assess individual products or systems to the wider approach that is becoming more common. Uncertainty in impact assessment strongly influences planning and compliance due to challenges in assigning accountability, and communicating the inherent complexity and uncertainty within bioenergy is becoming of greater importance. Conclusions: The emergence of LCA in bioenergy governance is particularly significant because other sectors are likely to transition to similar governance models. LCA is being stretched to accommodate complex and broad policy-relevant questions, seeking to incorporate externalities that have major implications for long-term sustainability. As policy increasingly relies on LCA, the strains placed on the methodology are becoming both clearer and impedimentary. The implications for energy policy, and in particular bioenergy, are large.},
doi = {10.1007/s11367-015-0930-7},
journal = {The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment},
number = 10,
volume = 20,
place = {United States},
year = {2015},
month = {8}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 8 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Greenhouse gas reporting for biofuels: A comparison between the RED, RTFO and PAS2050 methodologies
journal, October 2011


Sampling error in US field crop unit process data for life cycle assessment
journal, June 2012

  • Cooper, Joyce Smith; Kahn, Ezra; Ebel, Robert
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0454-3

Application of three independent consequential LCA approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg
journal, June 2013

  • Vázquez-Rowe, Ian; Rege, Sameer; Marvuglia, Antonino
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0604-2

Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A review
journal, September 2012

  • Borrion, Aiduan Li; McManus, Marcelle C.; Hammond, Geoffrey P.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.016

Implementing Integrated River Basin Management in China
journal, January 2010

  • te Boekhorst, Dorri G. J.; Smits, Toine J. M.; Yu, Xiubo
  • Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5751/ES-03369-150223

Accounting for indirect land-use change in the life cycle assessment of biofuel supply chains
journal, October 2011

  • Sanchez, Susan Tarka; Woods, Jeremy; Akhurst, Mark
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Vol. 9, Issue 71
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0769

Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors
journal, August 2013

  • Hetherington, Alexandra C.; Borrion, Aiduan Li; Griffiths, Owen Glyn
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0627-8

Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment
journal, September 2012

  • Hauschild, Michael Z.; Goedkoop, Mark; Guinée, Jeroen
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0489-5

Baseline effects on carbon footprints of biofuels: The case of wood
journal, November 2012


“Papering” Over Space and Place: Product Carbon Footprint Modeling in the Global Paper Industry
journal, July 2011


Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies
journal, January 2011


Life cycle assessment of biofuels in the European Renewable Energy Directive: a combination of approaches?
journal, October 2014


Product category rules alignment workshop, October 4, 2011 in Chicago, IL, USA
journal, December 2011

  • Ingwersen, Wesley; Subramanian, Vairavan; Schenck, Rita
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 17, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-011-0357-8

Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases: development of training material and other implementation activities on the publication
journal, March 2013

  • Sonnemann, Guido; Vigon, Bruce; Rack, Mireille
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0563-7

A global conversation about energy from biomass: the continental conventions of the global sustainable bioenergy project
journal, February 2011

  • Lynd, Lee Rybeck; Aziz, Ramlan Abdul; de Brito Cruz, Carlos Henrique
  • Interface Focus, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0047

Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services
journal, February 2014


Composition and effects of inhalable size fractions of atmospheric aerosols in the polluted atmosphere. Part II. In vitro biological potencies
journal, February 2014


The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp)
journal, October 2004

  • Frischknecht, Rolf; Jungbluth, Niels; Althaus, Hans-Jörg
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1

Biofuel economics in a setting of multiple objectives and unintended consequences
journal, December 2011

  • Jaeger, William K.; Egelkraut, Thorsten M.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.118

Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for the Bio-Based Economy in Europe: State of Discussion and Way Forward
journal, October 2014


Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: Critical review and proposed framework for biogas production
journal, September 2013

  • Marvuglia, Antonino; Benetto, Enrico; Rege, Sameer
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 25
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.031

Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies
journal, May 2012

  • Wardenaar, Tjerk; van Ruijven, Theo; Beltran, Angelica Mendoza
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 17, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0431-x

Seeking Citizens' Views on GM Crops: Experiences from the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand
journal, September 2005

  • Walls, John; Rogers-Hayden, Tee; Mohr, Alison
  • Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 47, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.3200/ENVT.47.7.22-37

What is the most appropriate LCA method for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from bioenergy?
journal, March 2011

  • Aylott, Matthew; Higson, Adrian; Evans, Geraint
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.282

Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation
journal, April 2014

  • Cohn, A. S.; Mosnier, A.; Havlik, P.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307163111

Is it possible to increase the sustainability of arable and ruminant agriculture by reducing inputs?
journal, February 2009


The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!
journal, January 2010

  • Benoît, Catherine; Norris, Gregory A.; Valdivia, Sonia
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8

Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology
journal, July 2008


A geospatial framework to support integrated biogeochemical modelling in the United Kingdom
journal, June 2015


Life cycle assessment of vegetable products: a review focusing on cropping systems diversity and the estimation of field emissions
journal, February 2014

  • Perrin, Aurélie; Basset-Mens, Claudine; Gabrielle, Benoît
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0724-3

A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products
journal, January 2009


What drives public acceptance of second-generation biofuels? Evidence from Canada
journal, April 2015


A review of LCA greenhouse gas emissions results for advanced biofuels: The use of meta-regression analysis
journal, October 2013

  • Menten, Fabio; Chèze, Benoît; Patouillard, Laure
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 26
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.021

Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context
journal, October 2011


Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values: Public engagement with climate change
journal, January 2014

  • Corner, Adam; Markowitz, Ezra; Pidgeon, Nick
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.269

Altered Belowground Carbon Cycling Following Land-Use Change to Perennial Bioenergy Crops
journal, January 2013

  • Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.; Masters, Michael D.; Black, Christopher K.
  • Ecosystems, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10021-012-9628-x

The potential impact of second-generation biofuel landscapes on at-risk species in the US
journal, December 2013

  • Evans, Samuel G.; Kelley, Lisa C.; Potts, Matthew D.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12131

A comparison of carbon accounting tools for arable crops in the United Kingdom
journal, August 2013


The uses of life cycle assessment for European Legislation
journal, March 1996

  • Schleicher, Ursula
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02978634

Water Footprint of U.S. Transportation Fuels
journal, April 2011

  • Scown, Corinne D.; Horvath, Arpad; McKone, Thomas E.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/es102633h

Prospects for Jatropha biofuels in Tanzania: An analysis with Strategic Niche Management
journal, January 2008


Quantifying the uncertainties in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for UK wheat ethanol
journal, February 2013


Modeling nitrogen loss from switchgrass agricultural systems
journal, October 2011


Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life-Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches
journal, January 2007


A framework for modelling indirect land use changes in Life Cycle Assessment
journal, July 2015


Good policy follows good science: using criteria and indicators for assessing sustainable biofuel production
journal, December 2008


Boundless Biofuels? Between Environmental Sustainability and Vulnerability
journal, October 2007


Best practices for biofuels
journal, June 2014


Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment
journal, October 2007


Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives
journal, July 2010


The applicability of the renewable energy directive calculation to assess the sustainability of biogas production
journal, May 2013


The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model
journal, March 2010

  • Perfecto, I.; Vandermeer, J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905455107

The biophysical link between climate, water, and vegetation in bioenergy agro-ecosystems
journal, December 2014


Social Life Cycle Assessment Revisited
journal, July 2014

  • Wu, Ruqun; Yang, Dan; Chen, Jiquan
  • Sustainability, Vol. 6, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.3390/su6074200

Life cycle assessments of biodegradable, commercial biopolymers—A critical review
journal, September 2013


Micro-Level Management of Agricultural Inputs: Emerging Approaches
journal, December 2012


From a critical review to a conceptual framework for integrating the criticality of resources into Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
journal, May 2015


Market aspects in product life cycle inventory methodology
journal, January 1993


Consensus and Contention in the Food-Versus-Fuel Debate
journal, October 2014


Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector
journal, May 2014

  • Bustamante, Mercedes; Robledo-Abad, Carmenza; Harper, Richard
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 20, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12591

Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies
journal, May 2013


The lessons of failure: learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making
journal, October 2012


The rebound effect through industrial ecology’s eyes: a review of LCA-based studies
journal, September 2014

  • Font Vivanco, David; van der Voet, Ester
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0802-6

Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys
journal, February 2014


Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – a review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union
journal, January 2014


Lights and shadows in consequential LCA
journal, April 2012

  • Zamagni, Alessandra; Guinée, Jeroen; Heijungs, Reinout
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 17, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x

Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement
journal, August 2011


Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden
journal, October 2004


Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology
journal, February 2000


Climate Policy Decisions Require Policy-Based Lifecycle Analysis
journal, May 2014

  • Bento, Antonio M.; Klotz, Richard
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1021/es405164g

Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
journal, January 2006


The ‘debt’ is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy
journal, April 2013

  • Lamers, Patrick; Junginger, Martin
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1407

LCA of second generation bioethanol: A review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice
journal, September 2012

  • Wiloso, Edi Iswanto; Heijungs, Reinout; de Snoo, Geert R.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.035

Water Embodied in Bioethanol in the United States
journal, April 2009

  • Chiu, Yi-Wen; Walseth, Brian; Suh, Sangwon
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/es8031067

Management swing potential for bioenergy crops
journal, January 2013

  • Davis, Sarah C.; Boddey, Robert M.; Alves, Bruno J. R.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12042

Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca
journal, March 2002

  • Björklund, Anna E.
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02978849

Background qualitative analysis of the European reference life cycle database (ELCD) energy datasets – part II: electricity datasets
journal, January 2015


Consideration of Black Carbon and Primary Organic Carbon Emissions in Life-Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Vehicle Systems and Fuels
journal, October 2014

  • Cai, Hao; Wang, Michael Q.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1021/es503852u

Role of Lignin in Reducing Life-Cycle Carbon Emissions, Water Use, and Cost for United States Cellulosic Biofuels
journal, July 2014

  • Scown, Corinne D.; Gokhale, Amit A.; Willems, Paul A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5012753

Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues
journal, January 2011


The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review
journal, October 2014

  • Smeets, Edward; Tabeau, Andrzej; van Berkum, Siemen
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 38
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.035

Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel options
journal, June 2013


Achieving Deep Cuts in the Carbon Intensity of U.S. Automobile Transportation by 2050: Complementary Roles for Electricity and Biofuels
journal, August 2013

  • Scown, Corinne D.; Taptich, Michael; Horvath, Arpad
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1021/es4015635

Sensitivity coefficient-based uncertainty analysis for multi-functionality in LCA
journal, October 2013

  • Jung, Johannes; von der Assen, Niklas; Bardow, André
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 19, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0655-4

Forest summer albedo is sensitive to species and thinning: how should we account for this in Earth system models?
journal, January 2014


System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
journal, February 2004

  • Suh, Sangwon; Lenzen, Manfred; Treloar, Graham J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 38, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/es0263745

Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets
journal, October 2013


Integrative modelling approaches for analysis of impact of multifunctional agriculture: A review for France, Germany and The Netherlands
journal, April 2007

  • Rossing, W. A. H.; Zander, P.; Josien, E.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 120, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.031

Model collaboration for the improved assessment of biomass supply, demand, and impacts
journal, April 2014

  • Wicke, Birka; van der Hilst, Floor; Daioglou, Vassilis
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12176

Approximation and Regional Aggregation in Multi-Regional Input–Output Analysis for National Carbon Footprint Accounting
journal, September 2009


Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Current Uncertainties and the Necessary Next Steps
journal, November 2013

  • Balvanera, Patricia; Siddique, Ilyas; Dee, Laura
  • BioScience, Vol. 64, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bit003

Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment
journal, June 2014


Measurement and communication of greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. food consumption via carbon calculators
journal, November 2009


Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies
journal, January 2010


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Development of LCA Calculator to support community infrastructure co-design
    journal, June 2018

    • Borrion, Aiduan; Matsushita, Jun; Austen, Kat
    • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 24, Issue 7
    • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-018-1492-2