Ground-based remote sensing scheme for monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions
Abstract
A new method for continuous observation of aerosol–cloud interactions with ground-based remote sensing instruments is presented. The main goal of this method is to enable the monitoring of the change of the cloud droplet size due to the change in the aerosol concentration. We use high-resolution measurements from a lidar, a radar and a radiometer, which allow us to collect and compare data continuously. This method is based on a standardised data format from Cloudnet and can be implemented at any observatory where the Cloudnet data set is available. Two example case studies were chosen from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program deployment on Graciosa Island, Azores, Portugal, in 2009 to present the method. We use the cloud droplet effective radius (re) to represent cloud microphysical properties and an integrated value of the attenuated backscatter coefficient (ATB) below the cloud to represent the aerosol concentration. All data from each case study are divided into bins of the liquid water path (LWP), each 10 g m-2 wide. For every LWP bin we present the correlation coefficient between ln re and ln ATB, as well as ACIr (defined as ACIr = -d ln re d ln ATB, change in cloud droplet effectivemore »
- Authors:
-
- Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft (The Netherlands)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft (The Netherlands). TU Delft Climate Institute, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geotechnology
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1375411
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online)
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online); Journal Volume: 9; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 1867-8548
- Publisher:
- European Geosciences Union
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Citation Formats
Sarna, Karolina, and Russchenberg, Herman W. J. Ground-based remote sensing scheme for monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.5194/amt-9-1039-2016.
Sarna, Karolina, & Russchenberg, Herman W. J. Ground-based remote sensing scheme for monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1039-2016
Sarna, Karolina, and Russchenberg, Herman W. J. Mon .
"Ground-based remote sensing scheme for monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1039-2016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1375411.
@article{osti_1375411,
title = {Ground-based remote sensing scheme for monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions},
author = {Sarna, Karolina and Russchenberg, Herman W. J.},
abstractNote = {A new method for continuous observation of aerosol–cloud interactions with ground-based remote sensing instruments is presented. The main goal of this method is to enable the monitoring of the change of the cloud droplet size due to the change in the aerosol concentration. We use high-resolution measurements from a lidar, a radar and a radiometer, which allow us to collect and compare data continuously. This method is based on a standardised data format from Cloudnet and can be implemented at any observatory where the Cloudnet data set is available. Two example case studies were chosen from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program deployment on Graciosa Island, Azores, Portugal, in 2009 to present the method. We use the cloud droplet effective radius (re) to represent cloud microphysical properties and an integrated value of the attenuated backscatter coefficient (ATB) below the cloud to represent the aerosol concentration. All data from each case study are divided into bins of the liquid water path (LWP), each 10 g m-2 wide. For every LWP bin we present the correlation coefficient between ln re and ln ATB, as well as ACIr (defined as ACIr = -d ln re d ln ATB, change in cloud droplet effective radius with aerosol concentration). Obtained values of ACIr are in the range 0.01–0.1. In conclusion, we show that ground-based remote sensing instruments used in synergy can efficiently and continuously monitor aerosol–cloud interactions.},
doi = {10.5194/amt-9-1039-2016},
journal = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online)},
number = 3,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {3}
}
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
Other availability
Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science
Web of Science
Figures / Tables:
Figure 1: The time–height cross section of the radar reflectivity factor from WACR, the attenuated backscatter coefficient from Vaisala CT25K and the liquid water path from the MWR for a full day of measurements on 3 November 2009.
All figures and tables
(11 total)
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.
Works referenced in this record:
The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds
journal, July 1977
- Twomey, S.
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 34, Issue 7
Marine Boundary Layer Cloud Observations in the Azores
journal, November 2012
- Rémillard, Jasmine; Kollias, Pavlos; Luke, Edward
- Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 21
Thin Liquid Water Clouds: Their Importance and Our Challenge
journal, February 2007
- Turner, D. D.; Vogelmann, A. M.; Austin, R. T.
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 2
A Technique for Autocalibration of Cloud Lidar
journal, May 2004
- O'Connor, Ewan J.; Illingworth, Anthony J.; Hogan, Robin J.
- Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 21, Issue 5
The effect of smoke, dust, and pollution aerosol on shallow cloud development over the Atlantic Ocean
journal, August 2005
- Kaufman, Y. J.; Koren, I.; Remer, L. A.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 102, Issue 32
Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey's approach
journal, October 2001
- Feingold, Graham; Remer, Lorraine A.; Ramaprasad, Jaya
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D19
The role of adiabaticity in the aerosol first indirect effect: THE ROLE OF ADIABATICITY
journal, March 2008
- Kim, Byung-Gon; Miller, Mark A.; Schwartz, Stephen E.
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 113, Issue D5
Comparison of Measurements of Cloud Droplets and Cloud Nuclei
journal, November 1967
- Twomey, S.; Warner, J.
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 24, Issue 6
An assessment of aerosol‐cloud interactions in marine stratus clouds based on surface remote sensing
journal, January 2009
- McComiskey, Allison; Feingold, Graham; Frisch, A. Shelby
- Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D9
The Retrieval of Stratus Cloud Droplet Effective Radius with Cloud Radars
journal, June 2002
- Frisch, Shelby; Shupe, Matthew; Djalalova, Irina
- Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 19, Issue 6
What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET
journal, January 2014
- Wiegner, M.; Madonna, F.; Binietoglou, I.
- Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 7, Issue 7
Aerosol indirect effect studies at Southern Great Plains during the May 2003 Intensive Operations Period
journal, January 2006
- Feingold, Graham; Furrer, Reinhard; Pilewskie, Peter
- Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue D5
On the Quantitative Low-Level Aerosol Measurements Using Ceilometer-Type Lidar
journal, November 2009
- Sundström, Anu-Maija; Nousiainen, Timo; Petäjä, Tuukka
- Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 11
Cloud optical thickness and liquid water path – does the k coefficient vary with droplet concentration?
journal, January 2011
- Brenguier, J. -L.; Burnet, F.; Geoffroy, O.
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 18
Cloudnet: Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations
journal, June 2007
- Illingworth, A. J.; Hogan, R. J.; O'Connor, E. J.
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 6
The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets
journal, January 1936
- Köhler, Hilding
- Trans. Faraday Soc., Vol. 32, Issue 0
Effects of varying aerosol regimes on low-level Arctic stratus: AEROSOL EFFECTS ON ARCTIC STRATUS
journal, September 2004
- Garrett, T. J.; Zhao, C.; Dong, X.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 17
Dual-FOV Raman and Doppler lidar studies of aerosol-cloud interactions: Simultaneous profiling of aerosols, warm-cloud properties, and vertical wind
journal, May 2014
- Schmidt, Jörg; Ansmann, Albert; Bühl, Johannes
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 9
Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement requirements
journal, January 2003
- Feingold, Graham
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 30, Issue 19
First measurements of the Twomey indirect effect using ground-based remote sensors: SURFACE REMOTE SENSING OF THE INDIRECT EFFECT
journal, March 2003
- Feingold, Graham; Eberhard, Wynn L.; Veron, Dana E.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 30, Issue 6
Pollution and the planetary albedo
journal, December 1974
- Twomey, S.
- Atmospheric Environment (1967), Vol. 8, Issue 12
The scale problem in quantifying aerosol indirect effects
journal, January 2012
- McComiskey, A.; Feingold, G.
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 2
The Marine Stratus/Stratocumulus Experiment (MASE): Aerosol-cloud relationships in marine stratocumulus: MASE-AEROSOL-CLOUD RELATIONSHIPS
journal, May 2007
- Lu, Miao-Ling; Conant, William C.; Jonsson, Haflidi H.
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 112, Issue D10
Radiation Profiles in Extended Water Clouds. II: Parameterization Schemes
journal, November 1978
- Stephens, G. L.
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 35, Issue 11
The Measurement and Parameterization of Effective Radius of Droplets in Warm Stratocumulus Clouds
journal, July 1994
- Martin, G. M.; Johnson, D. W.; Spice, A.
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 51, Issue 13
Retrieval of mixing height and dust concentration with lidar ceilometer
journal, August 2006
- Münkel, Christoph; Eresmaa, Noora; Räsänen, Janne
- Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 124, Issue 1
Strong aerosol–cloud interaction in altocumulus during updraft periods: lidar observations over central Europe
journal, January 2015
- Schmidt, J.; Ansmann, A.; Bühl, J.
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 18
What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET
journal, January 2014
- Wiegner, M.; Madonna, F.; Binietoglou, I.
- Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, Vol. 7, Issue 3
Pollution and the Planetary Albedo
journal, January 2007
- Twomey, S.
- Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 41
Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation
journal, March 1980
- Pruppacher, Hans R.; Klett, James D.
- Nature, Vol. 284, Issue 5751
Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation
journal, July 1979
- Zettlemoyer, A. C.
- Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 11, Issue 3
Aerosol Indirect Effect Studies at Southern Great Plains during the May 2003 Intensive Operation Period
text, January 2006
- Feingold, G.; Furrer, R.; Pilewiskie, P.
- American Geophysical Union
The scale problem in quantifying aerosol indirect effects
journal, January 2011
- McComiskey, A.; Feingold, G.
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 11, Issue 9
What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET
text, January 2014
- Wiegner, M.; Madonna, F.; Binietoglou, I.
- Karlsruhe
Works referencing / citing this record:
Monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions at the CESAR Observatory in the Netherlands
journal, January 2017
- Sarna, Karolina; Russchenberg, Herman W. J.
- Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 10, Issue 5
Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.