DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Contributions of different bias-correction methods and reference meteorological forcing data sets to uncertainty in projected temperature and precipitation extremes

Abstract

The use of different bias-correction methods and global retrospective meteorological forcing data sets as the reference climatology in the bias correction of general circulation model (GCM) daily data is a known source of uncertainty in projected climate extremes and their impacts. Despite their importance, limited attention has been given to these uncertainty sources. We compare 27 projected temperature and precipitation indices over 22 regions of the world (including the global land area) in the near (2021–2060) and distant future (2061–2100), calculated using four Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), five GCMs, two bias-correction methods, and three reference forcing data sets. To widen the variety of forcing data sets, we developed a new forcing data set, S14FD, and incorporated it into this study. The results show that S14FD is more accurate than other forcing data sets in representing the observed temperature and precipitation extremes in recent decades (1961–2000 and 1979–2008). The use of different bias-correction methods and forcing data sets contributes more to the total uncertainty in the projected precipitation index values in both the near and distant future than the use of different GCMs and RCPs. However, GCM appears to be the most dominant uncertainty source for projected temperature index values inmore » the near future, and RCP is the most dominant source in the distant future. Our findings encourage climate risk assessments, especially those related to precipitation extremes, to employ multiple bias-correction methods and forcing data sets in addition to using different GCMs and RCPs.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4];  [1]
  1. Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba Japan
  2. KOZO KEIKAKU ENGINEERING Inc., Tokyo Japan
  3. Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo Japan
  4. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba Japan
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1374078
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1374079; OSTI ID: 1533007
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG02-04ER63917; FG02-04ER63911
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

Citation Formats

Iizumi, Toshichika, Takikawa, Hiroki, Hirabayashi, Yukiko, Hanasaki, Naota, and Nishimori, Motoki. Contributions of different bias-correction methods and reference meteorological forcing data sets to uncertainty in projected temperature and precipitation extremes. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1002/2017JD026613.
Iizumi, Toshichika, Takikawa, Hiroki, Hirabayashi, Yukiko, Hanasaki, Naota, & Nishimori, Motoki. Contributions of different bias-correction methods and reference meteorological forcing data sets to uncertainty in projected temperature and precipitation extremes. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026613
Iizumi, Toshichika, Takikawa, Hiroki, Hirabayashi, Yukiko, Hanasaki, Naota, and Nishimori, Motoki. Sat . "Contributions of different bias-correction methods and reference meteorological forcing data sets to uncertainty in projected temperature and precipitation extremes". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026613.
@article{osti_1374078,
title = {Contributions of different bias-correction methods and reference meteorological forcing data sets to uncertainty in projected temperature and precipitation extremes},
author = {Iizumi, Toshichika and Takikawa, Hiroki and Hirabayashi, Yukiko and Hanasaki, Naota and Nishimori, Motoki},
abstractNote = {The use of different bias-correction methods and global retrospective meteorological forcing data sets as the reference climatology in the bias correction of general circulation model (GCM) daily data is a known source of uncertainty in projected climate extremes and their impacts. Despite their importance, limited attention has been given to these uncertainty sources. We compare 27 projected temperature and precipitation indices over 22 regions of the world (including the global land area) in the near (2021–2060) and distant future (2061–2100), calculated using four Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), five GCMs, two bias-correction methods, and three reference forcing data sets. To widen the variety of forcing data sets, we developed a new forcing data set, S14FD, and incorporated it into this study. The results show that S14FD is more accurate than other forcing data sets in representing the observed temperature and precipitation extremes in recent decades (1961–2000 and 1979–2008). The use of different bias-correction methods and forcing data sets contributes more to the total uncertainty in the projected precipitation index values in both the near and distant future than the use of different GCMs and RCPs. However, GCM appears to be the most dominant uncertainty source for projected temperature index values in the near future, and RCP is the most dominant source in the distant future. Our findings encourage climate risk assessments, especially those related to precipitation extremes, to employ multiple bias-correction methods and forcing data sets in addition to using different GCMs and RCPs.},
doi = {10.1002/2017JD026613},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Aug 05 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Sat Aug 05 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026613

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 68 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A 53-year forcing data set for land surface models: A 53-YEAR FORCING DATA SET FOR LSMS
journal, March 2005

  • Ngo-Duc, T.; Polcher, J.; Laval, K.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 110, Issue D6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005434

The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data
journal, September 2014

  • Weedon, Graham P.; Balsamo, Gianpaolo; Bellouin, Nicolas
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015638

Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes?
journal, September 2015


MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data
journal, January 2017

  • Beck, Hylke E.; van Dijk, Albert I. J. M.; Levizzani, Vincenzo
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 21, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess‐21‐589‐2017

Assessing the limits of bias-correcting climate model outputs for climate change impact studies
journal, February 2015

  • Chen, Jie; Brissette, François P.; Lucas-Picher, Philippe
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022635

Humidity: A review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health
journal, January 2016


An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – Part 1: Model description and input meteorological forcing
journal, January 2008


Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
journal, March 2013


Introduction to climate change scenario derived by statistical downscaling [統計的ダウンスケーリングによる気候変化シナリオ作成入門]
journal, January 2010

  • Iizumi, Toshichika; Nishimori, Motoki; Ishigooka, Yasushi
  • Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, Vol. 66, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2480/agrmet.66.2.5

Inter-comparison of statistical downscaling methods for projection of extreme precipitation in Europe
journal, January 2015


Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century
journal, October 2011

  • Weedon, G. P.; Gomes, S.; Viterbo, P.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JHM1369.1

Development of a 50-Year High-Resolution Global Dataset of Meteorological Forcings for Land Surface Modeling
journal, July 2006

  • Sheffield, Justin; Goteti, Gopi; Wood, Eric F.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3790.1

Downscaling Extremes: An Intercomparison of Multiple Methods for Future Climate
journal, May 2013


Emission scenario dependencies in climate change assessments of the hydrological cycle: A letter
journal, January 2010


Changes in Climate Extremes and their Impacts on the Natural Physical Environment
book, May 2012

  • Seneviratne, Sonia I.; Nicholls, Neville; Easterling, David
  • Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation
  • DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139177245.006

The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
journal, April 2011

  • Dee, D. P.; Uppala, S. M.; Simmons, A. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 656
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.828

Propagation of biases in humidity in the estimation of global irrigation water
journal, January 2015


The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics
journal, January 2015

  • Kobayashi, Shinya; Ota, Yukinari; Harada, Yayoi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 93, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2015‐001

Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections: CMIP5 PROJECTIONS OF EXTREMES INDICES
journal, March 2013

  • Sillmann, J.; Kharin, V. V.; Zwiers, F. W.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50188

A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach
journal, January 2013


Spatial uncertainty in bias corrected climate change projections and hydrogeological impacts: Spatial Uncertainty
journal, June 2015

  • Seaby, L. P.; Refsgaard, J. C.; Sonnenborg, T. O.
  • Hydrological Processes, Vol. 29, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10501

On the contribution of statistical bias correction to the uncertainty in the projected hydrological cycle: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES
journal, October 2011

  • Chen, Cui; Haerter, Jan O.; Hagemann, Stefan
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011GL049318

Avoiding Inhomogeneity in Percentile-Based Indices of Temperature Extremes
journal, June 2005

  • Zhang, Xuebin; Hegerl, Gabriele; Zwiers, Francis W.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 18, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3366.1

GPCC Full Data Reanalysis Version 7.0 at 0.5°: Monthly Land-Surface Precipitation from Rain-Gauges built on GTS-based and Historic Data
dataset, January 2015

  • Schneider, Udo; Becker, Andreas; Finger, Peter
  • Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) at Deutscher Wetterdienst
  • DOI: 10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V7_050

A meteorological forcing data set for global crop modeling: Development, evaluation, and intercomparison: FORCING DATA FOR GLOBAL CROP MODELING
journal, January 2014

  • Iizumi, Toshichika; Okada, Masashi; Yokozawza, Masayuki
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020130

Future change of daily precipitation indices in Japan: A stochastic weather generator-based bootstrap approach to provide probabilistic climate information: FUTURE CHANGE OF PRECIPITATION INDICES
journal, June 2012

  • Iizumi, Toshichika; Takayabu, Izuru; Dairaku, Koji
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017197

Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change: AGROCLIMATIC CONDITIONS IN EUROPE UNDER CC
journal, March 2011


Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation
journal, January 2006

  • Alexander, L. V.; Zhang, X.; Peterson, T. C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue D5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006290

Choice of baseline climate data impacts projected species' responses to climate change
journal, April 2016

  • Baker, David J.; Hartley, Andrew J.; Butchart, Stuart H. M.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 22, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13273

Climate forcing datasets for agricultural modeling: Merged products for gap-filling and historical climate series estimation
journal, January 2015


A One-dimensional Land Surface Model Adaptable to Intensely Cold Regions and its Applications in Eastern Siberia.
journal, January 2001

  • Yamazaki, Takeshi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 79, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.79.1107

The ERA-40 re-analysis
journal, October 2005

  • Uppala, S. M.; KÅllberg, P. W.; Simmons, A. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 131, Issue 612
  • DOI: 10.1256/qj.04.176

Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: The HadEX2 dataset: HADEX2-GLOBAL GRIDDED CLIMATE EXTREMES
journal, March 2013

  • Donat, M. G.; Alexander, L. V.; Yang, H.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50150

An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS‐D‐11‐00094.1

Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century
journal, January 2002

  • Frich, P.; Alexander, Lv; Della-Marta, P.
  • Climate Research, Vol. 19
  • DOI: 10.3354/cr019193

The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011


Discontinuous Daily Temperatures in the WATCH Forcing Datasets
journal, February 2015


The JRA-55 Reanalysis: Representation of Atmospheric Circulation and Climate Variability
journal, January 2016

  • Harada, Yayoi; Kamahori, Hirotaka; Kobayashi, Chiaki
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 94, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2016‐015

Comparison of Modeled and Observed Trends in Indices of Daily Climate Extremes
journal, November 2003


Towards a public, standardized, diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models
journal, January 2012


Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data: Indices for monitoring changes in extremes
journal, October 2011

  • Zhang, Xuebin; Alexander, Lisa; Hegerl, Gabriele C.
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.147

The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
journal, March 1996


Dependence of Precipitation Scaling Patterns on Emission Scenarios for Representative Concentration Pathways
journal, November 2013


Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations - the CRU TS3.10 Dataset: UPDATED HIGH-RESOLUTION GRIDS OF MONTHLY CLIMATIC OBSERVATIONS
journal, May 2013

  • Harris, I.; Jones, P. D.; Osborn, T. J.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 34, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.3711

A 59-year (1948-2006) global meteorological forcing data set for land surface models. Part II: Global snowfall estimation
journal, January 2008

  • Hirabayashi, Yukiko; Kanae, Shinjiro; Motoya, Ken
  • Hydrological Research Letters, Vol. 2
  • DOI: 10.3178/HRL.2.65

The JRA-25 Reanalysis
journal, January 2007

  • Onogi, Kazutoshi; Tsutsui, Junichi; Koide, Hiroshi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 85, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.85.369

Enhancing the utility of daily GCM rainfall for crop yield prediction
journal, September 2010

  • Ines, Amor V. M.; Hansen, James W.; Robertson, Andrew W.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 31, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.2223

Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate: CLIMATE EXTREMES INDICES IN CMIP5
journal, February 2013

  • Sillmann, J.; Kharin, V. V.; Zhang, X.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50203

Multisegment statistical bias correction of daily GCM precipitation output: M-S PRECIPITATION BIAS CORRECTION
journal, April 2013

  • Grillakis, Manolis G.; Koutroulis, Aristeidis G.; Tsanis, Ioannis K.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50323