DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus cloud

Abstract

Three-dimensional large eddy simulations (LES) are used to analyze a springtime Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus observed on 26 April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign. Two subgrid-scale turbulence parameterizations are compared. The first scheme is a 1.5-order turbulent kinetic energy (1.5-TKE) parameterization that has been previously applied to boundary layer cloud simulations. The second scheme, Cloud Layers Unified By Binormals (CLUBB), provides higher-order turbulent closure with scale awareness. The simulations, in comparisons with observations, show that both schemes produce the liquid profiles within measurement variability but underpredict ice water mass and overpredict ice number concentration. The simulation using CLUBB underpredicted liquid water path more than the simulation using the 1.5-TKE scheme, so the turbulent length scale and horizontal grid box size were increased to increase liquid water path and reduce dissipative energy. The LES simulations show this stratocumulus cloud to maintain a closed cellular structure, similar to observations. The updraft and downdraft cores self-organize into a larger meso-γ-scale convective pattern with the 1.5-TKE scheme, but the cores remain more isotropic with the CLUBB scheme. Additionally, the cores are often composed of liquid and ice instead of exclusively containing one or the other. Furthermore, these results provide insight into traditionallymore » unresolved and unmeasurable aspects of an Arctic mixed-phase cloud. From analysis, this cloud's updraft and downdraft cores appear smaller than other closed-cell stratocumulus such as midlatitude stratocumulus and Arctic autumnal mixed-phase stratocumulus due to the weaker downdrafts and lower precipitation rates.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
  2. Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena, CA (United States)
  3. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1371481
Report Number(s):
SAND2017-3557J
Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X; 655054
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 122; Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Roesler, Erika L., Posselt, Derek J., and Rood, Richard B. Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus cloud. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1002/2016JD026055.
Roesler, Erika L., Posselt, Derek J., & Rood, Richard B. Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus cloud. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026055
Roesler, Erika L., Posselt, Derek J., and Rood, Richard B. Thu . "Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus cloud". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026055. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1371481.
@article{osti_1371481,
title = {Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus cloud},
author = {Roesler, Erika L. and Posselt, Derek J. and Rood, Richard B.},
abstractNote = {Three-dimensional large eddy simulations (LES) are used to analyze a springtime Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus observed on 26 April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign. Two subgrid-scale turbulence parameterizations are compared. The first scheme is a 1.5-order turbulent kinetic energy (1.5-TKE) parameterization that has been previously applied to boundary layer cloud simulations. The second scheme, Cloud Layers Unified By Binormals (CLUBB), provides higher-order turbulent closure with scale awareness. The simulations, in comparisons with observations, show that both schemes produce the liquid profiles within measurement variability but underpredict ice water mass and overpredict ice number concentration. The simulation using CLUBB underpredicted liquid water path more than the simulation using the 1.5-TKE scheme, so the turbulent length scale and horizontal grid box size were increased to increase liquid water path and reduce dissipative energy. The LES simulations show this stratocumulus cloud to maintain a closed cellular structure, similar to observations. The updraft and downdraft cores self-organize into a larger meso-γ-scale convective pattern with the 1.5-TKE scheme, but the cores remain more isotropic with the CLUBB scheme. Additionally, the cores are often composed of liquid and ice instead of exclusively containing one or the other. Furthermore, these results provide insight into traditionally unresolved and unmeasurable aspects of an Arctic mixed-phase cloud. From analysis, this cloud's updraft and downdraft cores appear smaller than other closed-cell stratocumulus such as midlatitude stratocumulus and Arctic autumnal mixed-phase stratocumulus due to the weaker downdrafts and lower precipitation rates.},
doi = {10.1002/2016JD026055},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = 8,
volume = 122,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 06 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Thu Apr 06 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution during Mixed-Phase Cloud Glaciation Simulated Using the Bulk Adaptive Habit Prediction Model
journal, November 2014

  • Sulia, Kara J.; Morrison, Hugh; Harrington, Jerry Y.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 71, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0070.1

Simulation of Boundary-Layer Cumulus and Stratocumulus Clouds Using a Cloud-Resolving Model with Low-and Third-order Turbulence Closures
journal, January 2008

  • Cheng, Anning; Xu, Kuan-Man
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 86A
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.86A.67

Sensitivity of modeled arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus to cloud condensation and ice nuclei over regionally varying surface conditions: SIMULATION OF ARCTIC MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS
journal, March 2008

  • Morrison, Hugh; Pinto, James O.; Curry, Judith A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 113, Issue D5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008729

Modelling microphysical and meteorological controls on precipitation and cloud cellular structures in Southeast Pacific stratocumulus
journal, January 2010


The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3)
journal, June 2006

  • Collins, William D.; Rasch, Philip J.; Boville, Byron A.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3760.1

A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description
journal, December 2002


Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes: ARCTIC LINKS TO MID-LATITUDE WEATHER
journal, March 2012

  • Francis, Jennifer A.; Vavrus, Stephen J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051000

A New Double-Moment Microphysics Parameterization for Application in Cloud and Climate Models. Part I: Description
journal, June 2005

  • Morrison, H.; Curry, J. A.; Khvorostyanov, V. I.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 62, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3446.1

Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties Derived from Surface-Based Sensors at SHEBA
journal, February 2006

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Matrosov, Sergey Y.; Uttal, Taneil
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 63, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3659.1

Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds
journal, December 2011

  • Morrison, Hugh; de Boer, Gijs; Feingold, Graham
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1332

Vertical Motions in Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Clouds
journal, April 2008

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Kollias, Pavlos; Persson, P. Ola G.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 65, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JAS2479.1

Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions
journal, March 2014

  • Ovchinnikov, Mikhail; Ackerman, Andrew S.; Avramov, Alexander
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000282

Precipitation-generated oscillations in open cellular cloud fields
journal, August 2010

  • Feingold, Graham; Koren, Ilan; Wang, Hailong
  • Nature, Vol. 466, Issue 7308
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature09314

Indirect and Semi-direct Aerosol Campaign: The Impact of Arctic Aerosols on Clouds
journal, February 2011

  • McFarquhar, Greg M.; Ghan, Steven; Verlinde, Johannes
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 92, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010BAMS2935.1

Ice formation in Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Insights from a 3-D cloud-resolving model with size-resolved aerosol and cloud microphysics
journal, January 2009

  • Fan, Jiwen; Ovtchinnikov, Mikhail; Comstock, Jennifer M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD010782

Small-Scale and Mesoscale Variability in Cloudy Boundary Layers: Joint Probability Density Functions
journal, December 2002


On Cellular Cloud Patterns. Part 1: Mathematical Model
journal, July 1975


Moisture and dynamical interactions maintaining decoupled Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus in the presence of a humidity inversion
journal, January 2011

  • Solomon, A.; Shupe, M. D.; Persson, P. O. G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-10127-2011

Intercomparison of cloud model simulations of Arctic mixed-phase boundary layer clouds observed during SHEBA/FIRE-ACE: INTERCOMPARISON OF CLOUD MODEL SIMULATIONS OF ARCTIC MIXED-PHASE
journal, February 2011

  • Morrison, Hugh; Zuidema, Paquita; Ackerman, Andrew S.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011MS000066

Influence of parameterized ice habit on simulated mixed phase Arctic clouds
journal, January 2010

  • Avramov, Alexander; Harrington, Jerry Y.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012108

Developing large-scale forcing data for single-column and cloud-resolving models from the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment
journal, January 2006

  • Xie, Shaocheng; Klein, Stephen A.; Zhang, Minghua
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue D19
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006950

Toward ice formation closure in Arctic mixed-phase boundary layer clouds during ISDAC
journal, January 2011

  • Avramov, Alexander; Ackerman, Andrew S.; Fridlind, Ann M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD015910

Science Overview Document Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC) April 2008
report, November 2007


Cloud Resolving Modeling of the ARM Summer 1997 IOP: Model Formulation, Results, Uncertainties, and Sensitivities
journal, February 2003


Can global models ignore the chemical composition of aerosols?: CAN GCMS IGNORE AEROSOL COMPOSITION?
journal, December 2010

  • Roesler, E. L.; Penner, J. E.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010GL044282

Characterizing Arctic mixed‐phase cloud structure and its relationship with humidity and temperature inversion using ARM NSA observations
journal, August 2015

  • Qiu, Shaoyue; Dong, Xiquan; Xi, Baike
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD023022

Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, December 2013

  • Bogenschutz, Peter A.; Gettelman, Andrew; Morrison, Hugh
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1

Arctic air pollution: An overview of current knowledge
journal, January 1986


Overview of Arctic Cloud and Radiation Characteristics
journal, August 1996


Thin Liquid Water Clouds: Their Importance and Our Challenge
journal, February 2007

  • Turner, D. D.; Vogelmann, A. M.; Austin, R. T.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-88-2-177

PDF Parameterization of Boundary Layer Clouds in Models with Horizontal Grid Spacings from 2 to 16 km
journal, January 2012

  • Larson, Vincent E.; Schanen, David P.; Wang, Minghuai
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 140, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05059.1

Cloud and boundary layer interactions over the Arctic sea ice in late summer
journal, January 2013

  • Shupe, M. D.; Persson, P. O. G.; Brooks, I. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-9379-2013

Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model
journal, June 1980

  • Deardorff, James W.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00119502

Stratocumulus Clouds
journal, August 2012


A Model to Determine Open or Closed Cellular Convection
journal, March 1983


Arctic Cloud Microphysics Retrievals from Surface-Based Remote Sensors at SHEBA
journal, October 2005

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Uttal, Taneil; Matrosov, Sergey Y.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 44, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAM2297.1

Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations: ARCTIC SEA ICE EXTENT FROM CMIP5
journal, August 2012

  • Stroeve, Julienne C.; Kattsov, Vladimir; Barrett, Andrew
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052676

Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud
journal, April 2009

  • Klein, Stephen A.; McCoy, Renata B.; Morrison, Hugh
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 641
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.416

Effects of ice number concentration on dynamics of a shallow mixed-phase stratiform cloud
journal, January 2011

  • Ovchinnikov, Mikhail; Korolev, Alexei; Fan, Jiwen
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD015888

Objective Analysis of ARM IOP Data: Method and Sensitivity
journal, February 2001


Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Cloud Properties from Multiple Years of Surface-Based Measurements at Two High-Latitude Locations
journal, September 2009

  • de Boer, Gijs; Eloranta, Edwin W.; Shupe, Matthew D.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 66, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JAS3029.1

A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types
journal, March 2000

  • Abdul-Razzak, Hayder; Ghan, Steven J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 105, Issue D5
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JD901161

Shattering and Particle Interarrival Times Measured by Optical Array Probes in Ice Clouds
journal, October 2006

  • Field, P. R.; Heymsfield, A. J.; Bansemer, A.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 23, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1922.1

Influence of grid aspect ratio on planetary boundary layer turbulence in large-eddy simulations
journal, January 2015

  • Nishizawa, S.; Yashiro, H.; Sato, Y.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-3393-2015

Ice properties of single-layer stratocumulus during the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 1. Observations
journal, January 2007

  • McFarquhar, Greg M.; Zhang, Gong; Poellot, Michael R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008633

In Situ Characterization of Cloud Condensation Nuclei, Interstitial, and Background Particles Using the Single Particle Mass Spectrometer, SPLAT II
journal, October 2010

  • Zelenyuk, Alla; Imre, Dan; Earle, Michael
  • Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 82, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/ac1013892

Parameterizing deep convection using the assumed probability density function method
journal, January 2015

  • Storer, R. L.; Griffin, B. M.; Höft, J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-1-2015

An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA
journal, January 2002


Effects of resolution on the simulation of boundary-layer clouds and the partition of kinetic energy to subgrid scales
journal, January 2010

  • Cheng, Anning; Xu, Kuan-Man; Stevens, Bjorn
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 2
  • DOI: 10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.3

Works referencing / citing this record:

Simulated and observed horizontal inhomogeneities of optical thickness of Arctic stratus
journal, January 2018

  • Schäfer, Michael; Loewe, Katharina; Ehrlich, André
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-13115-2018

Simulated and observed horizontal inhomogeneities of optical thickness of Arctic stratus
text, January 2018


Simulated and observed horizontal inhomogeneities of optical thickness of Arctic stratus
posted_content, February 2018

  • Schäfer, Michael; Loewe, Katharina; Ehrlich, André
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-2018-62