DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model

Abstract

We describe an emulator of a detailed cloud parcel model which has been trained to assess droplet nucleation from a complex, multimodal aerosol size distribution simulated by a global aerosol–climate model. The emulator is constructed using a sensitivity analysis approach (polynomial chaos expansion) which reproduces the behavior of the targeted parcel model across the full range of aerosol properties and meteorology simulated by the parent climate model. An iterative technique using aerosol fields sampled from a global model is used to identify the critical aerosol size distribution parameters necessary for accurately predicting activation. Across the large parameter space used to train them, the emulators estimate cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) with a mean relative error of 9.2% for aerosol populations without giant cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and 6.9% when including them. Versus a parcel model driven by those same aerosol fields, the best-performing emulator has a mean relative error of 4.6%, which is comparable with two commonly used activation schemes also evaluated here (which have mean relative errors of 2.9 and 6.7%, respectively). We identify the potential for regional biases in modeled CDNC, particularly in oceanic regimes, where our best-performing emulator tends to overpredict by 7%, whereas the reference activationmore » schemes range in mean relative error from -3 to 7%. The emulators which include the effects of giant CCN are more accurate in continental regimes (mean relative error of 0.3%) but strongly overestimate CDNC in oceanic regimes by up to 22%, particularly in the Southern Ocean. Finally, the biases in CDNC resulting from the subjective choice of activation scheme could potentially influence the magnitude of the indirect effect diagnosed from the model incorporating it.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]
  1. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States). Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1368370
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG02-94ER61937; 1122374; AGS-1339264
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online); Journal Volume: 10; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Rothenberg, Daniel, and Wang, Chien. An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017.
Rothenberg, Daniel, & Wang, Chien. An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017
Rothenberg, Daniel, and Wang, Chien. Thu . "An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1368370.
@article{osti_1368370,
title = {An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol–climate model},
author = {Rothenberg, Daniel and Wang, Chien},
abstractNote = {We describe an emulator of a detailed cloud parcel model which has been trained to assess droplet nucleation from a complex, multimodal aerosol size distribution simulated by a global aerosol–climate model. The emulator is constructed using a sensitivity analysis approach (polynomial chaos expansion) which reproduces the behavior of the targeted parcel model across the full range of aerosol properties and meteorology simulated by the parent climate model. An iterative technique using aerosol fields sampled from a global model is used to identify the critical aerosol size distribution parameters necessary for accurately predicting activation. Across the large parameter space used to train them, the emulators estimate cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) with a mean relative error of 9.2% for aerosol populations without giant cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and 6.9% when including them. Versus a parcel model driven by those same aerosol fields, the best-performing emulator has a mean relative error of 4.6%, which is comparable with two commonly used activation schemes also evaluated here (which have mean relative errors of 2.9 and 6.7%, respectively). We identify the potential for regional biases in modeled CDNC, particularly in oceanic regimes, where our best-performing emulator tends to overpredict by 7%, whereas the reference activation schemes range in mean relative error from -3 to 7%. The emulators which include the effects of giant CCN are more accurate in continental regimes (mean relative error of 0.3%) but strongly overestimate CDNC in oceanic regimes by up to 22%, particularly in the Southern Ocean. Finally, the biases in CDNC resulting from the subjective choice of activation scheme could potentially influence the magnitude of the indirect effect diagnosed from the model incorporating it.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development (Online)},
number = 4,
volume = 10,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 27 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Thu Apr 27 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 5 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Parameterization of the influence of organic surfactants on aerosol activation: ACTIVATION OF ORGANIC AEROSOL
journal, February 2004

  • Abdul-Razzak, Hayder; Ghan, Steven J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 109, Issue D3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003JD004043

Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models
journal, January 2005

  • Fountoukis, Christos
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 110, Issue D11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005591

Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect
journal, January 2009

  • Hoose, C.; Kristjánsson, J. E.; Iversen, T.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009GL038568

Characteristic updrafts for computing distribution-averaged cloud droplet number and stratocumulus cloud properties
journal, January 2010

  • Morales, R.; Nenes, A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD013233

Distribution and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in an interactive size-resolving aerosol–climate model
journal, January 2008

  • Kim, Dongchul; Wang, Chien; Ekman, Annica M. L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD009756

A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types
journal, March 2000

  • Abdul-Razzak, Hayder; Ghan, Steven J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 105, Issue D5
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JD901161

Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in global climate models
journal, January 2003


Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in large-scale models: Including effects of entrainment
journal, January 2007

  • Barahona, Donifan; Nenes, Athanasios
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008473

Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, July 2014

  • Albani, S.; Mahowald, N. M.; Perry, A. T.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000279

Comprehensively accounting for the effect of giant CCN in cloud activation parameterizations
journal, January 2010

  • Barahona, D.; West, R. E. L.; Stier, P.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-2467-2010

Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing
journal, November 2013

  • Carslaw, K. S.; Lee, L. A.; Reddington, C. L.
  • Nature, Vol. 503, Issue 7474
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12674

A comprehensive two-moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. I: Description and tests
journal, July 2000

  • Cohard, Jean-Martial; Pinty, Jean-Pierre
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 126, Issue 566
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712656613

Influence of water-soluble organic carbon on cloud drop number concentration
journal, January 2005


Chaospy: An open source tool for designing methods of uncertainty quantification
journal, November 2015


Parameterizations of Condensational Growth of Droplets for Use in General Circulation Models
journal, December 1992


Incorporation of advanced aerosol activation treatments into CESM/CAM5: model evaluation and impacts on aerosol indirect effects
journal, January 2014


Prediction of cloud droplet number in a general circulation model
journal, September 1997

  • Ghan, Steven J.; Leung, L. Ruby; Easter, Richard C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 102, Issue D18
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JD01810

Droplet nucleation: Physically-based parameterizations and comparative evaluation: DROPLET NUCLEATION
journal, April 2011

  • Ghan, Steven J.; Abdul-Razzak, Hayder; Nenes, Athanasios
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 3, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011MS000074

A parameterization of cloud droplet nucleation part I: single aerosol type
journal, December 1993


Adjoint sensitivity of global cloud droplet number to aerosol and dynamical parameters
journal, January 2012

  • Karydis, V. A.; Capps, S. L.; Russell, A. G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012

The responses of cloudiness to the direct radiative effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: Cloud responses to aerosols
journal, February 2014

  • Kim, Dongchul; Wang, Chien; Ekman, Annica M. L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020529

Parameterization of cloud droplet formation for global and regional models: including adsorption activation from insoluble CCN
journal, January 2009

  • Kumar, P.; Sokolik, I. N.; Nenes, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 9, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009

Cloud droplet nucleation and cloud scavenging of aerosol sulphate in polluted atmospheres
journal, November 1986


Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5
journal, January 2012

  • Liu, X.; Easter, R. C.; Ghan, S. J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012

Laboratory simulations and parameterization of the primary marine aerosol production: THE PRIMARY MARINE AEROSOL SOURCE
journal, May 2003

  • Mårtensson, E. M.; Nilsson, E. D.; de Leeuw, G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 108, Issue D9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002263

A New Parameterization of Cloud Droplet Activation Applicable to General Circulation Models
journal, April 2006

  • Ming, Yi; Ramaswamy, V.; Donner, Leo J.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 63, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3686.1

Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
journal, January 2014


Droplet activation parameterization: the population-splitting concept revisited
journal, January 2014


Kinetic limitations on cloud droplet formation and impact on cloud albedo
journal, April 2001


Inverse modeling of cloud-aerosol interactions – Part 1: Detailed response surface analysis
journal, January 2011

  • Partridge, D. G.; Vrugt, J. A.; Tunved, P.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-7269-2011

A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity
journal, January 2007

  • Petters, M. D.; Kreidenweis, S. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007

Metamodeling of Droplet Activation for Global Climate Models
journal, March 2016

  • Rothenberg, Daniel; Wang, Chien
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 73, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0223.1

Modeling dust as component minerals in the Community Atmosphere Model: development of framework and impact on radiative forcing
journal, January 2015

  • Scanza, R. A.; Mahowald, N.; Ghan, S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-537-2015

Analytical estimation of cloud droplet nucleation based on an underlying aerosol population
journal, May 2010


An investigation into the performance of four cloud droplet activation parameterisations
journal, January 2014

  • Simpson, E.; Connolly, P.; McFiggans, G.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-1535-2014

An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models
journal, September 1997

  • Tatang, Menner A.; Pan, Wenwei; Prinn, Ronald G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 102, Issue D18
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JD01654

Cloud droplet number enhanced by co-condensation of organic vapours
journal, May 2013

  • Topping, David; Connolly, Paul; McFiggans, Gordon
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 6, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1809

The multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF: model description and evaluation
journal, January 2011


The role of the particle size distribution in assessing aerosol composition effects on simulated droplet activation
journal, January 2010

  • Ward, D. S.; Eidhammer, T.; Cotton, W. R.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-5435-2010

The importance of vertical velocity variability for estimates of the indirect aerosol effects
journal, January 2014

  • West, R. E. L.; Stier, P.; Jones, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-6369-2014

The effects of giant cloud condensation nuclei on the development of precipitation in convective clouds — a numerical study
journal, March 2000


The Impact of Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei on Drizzle Formation in Stratocumulus: Implications for Cloud Radiative Properties
journal, December 1999


A comprehensive two-moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. I: Description and tests
journal, July 2000

  • Cohard, Jean-Martial; Pinty, Jean-Pierre
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 126, Issue 566
  • DOI: 10.1256/smsqj.56613

The multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF: model description and evaluation
journal, January 2010

  • Wang, M.; Ghan, S.; Easter, R.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 3, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-3-1625-2010

Droplet activation parameterization: the population splitting concept revisited
journal, January 2014

  • Morales Betancourt, R.; Nenes, A.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-7-2903-2014

Kinetic limitations on cloud droplet formation and impact on cloud albedo
journal, January 2001

  • Nenes, Athanasios; Ghan, Steven; Abdul-Razzak, Hayder
  • Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, Vol. 53, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v53i2.16569

Adjoint sensitivity of global cloud droplet number to aerosol and dynamical parameters
journal, January 2012

  • Karydis, V. A.; Capps, S. L.; Russell, A. G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-12-12081-2012

Cloud droplet nucleation and cloud scavenging of aerosol sulphate in polluted atmospheres
journal, August 1986

  • Leaitch, W. R.; Strapp, J. W.; Isaac, G. A.
  • Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, Vol. 38, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v38i5.15141

A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity
journal, January 2006

  • Petters, M. D.; Kreidenweis, S. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-6-8435-2006

Chaospy: An open source tool for designing methods of uncertainty quantification
journal, November 2015


Prediction of the number of cloud droplets in the ECHAM GCM
journal, April 1999

  • Lohmann, Ulrike; Feichter, Johann; Chuang, Catherine C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 104, Issue D8
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999jd900046

A modeling study of global mixed aerosol fields
journal, December 2001

  • Wilson, Julian; Cuvelier, Cornelis; Raes, Frank
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000jd000198

Cloud droplet number enhanced by co-condensation of organic vapours
journal, May 2013

  • Topping, David; Connolly, Paul; McFiggans, Gordon
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 6, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1809

Hysterectomy: the Indications and Results. A Study of (113) Patients in Duhok City
journal, September 2000

  • Razzak, Ala Hani
  • Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani - Part A, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.17656/jzs.10074

Kinetic limitations on cloud droplet formation and impact on cloud albedo
journal, January 2001

  • Nenes, Athanasios; Ghan, Steven; Abdul-Razzak, Hayder
  • Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, Vol. 53, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v53i2.16569

Comprehensively accounting for the effect of giant CCN in cloud activation parameterizations
journal, January 2010

  • Barahona, D.; West, R. E. L.; Stier, P.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-2467-2010

The importance of vertical velocity variability for estimates of the indirect aerosol effects
journal, January 2014

  • West, R. E. L.; Stier, P.; Jones, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-6369-2014

A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity
journal, January 2006

  • Petters, M. D.; Kreidenweis, S. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-6-8435-2006

Works referencing / citing this record:

Background Conditions Influence the Estimated Cloud Radiative Effects of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Different Source Regions
journal, February 2019

  • Grandey, Benjamin S.; Wang, Chien
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd029644

Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG
journal, January 2018

  • Grandey, Benjamin S.; Rothenberg, Daniel; Avramov, Alexander
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-15783-2018

Impacts on cloud radiative effects induced by coexisting aerosols converted from international shipping and maritime DMS emissions
journal, January 2018

  • Jin, Qinjian; Grandey, Benjamin S.; Rothenberg, Daniel
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-16793-2018

On the representation of aerosol activation and its influence on model-derived estimates of the aerosol indirect effect
journal, January 2018

  • Rothenberg, Daniel; Avramov, Alexander; Wang, Chien
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-7961-2018

Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG
text, January 2018