Impact of Reprocessed Uranium Management on the Homogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in PWRs
Abstract
This article presents the results of a neutronics analysis related to the homogeneous recycling of transuranics (TRU) in PWRs with a MOX fuel using enriched uranium instead of depleted uranium. It also addresses an often, if not always, overlooked aspect related to the recycling of TRU in PWRs, namely the use of reprocessed uranium. From a neutronics point of view, it is possible to multi-recycle the entirety of the plutonium with or without neptunium and americium in a PWR fleet using MOX-EU fuel in between one third and two thirds of the fleet. Recycling neptunium and americium with plutonium significantly decreases the decay heat of the waste stream between 100 to 1,000 years compared to those of an open fuel cycle or when only plutonium is recycled. The uranium present in MOX-EU used fuel still contains a significant amount of 235uranium and recycling it makes a major difference on the natural uranium needs. For example, a PWR fleet recycling its plutonium, neptunium and americium in MOXEU needs 28 percent more natural uranium than a reference UO2 open cycle fleet generating the same energy if the reprocessed uranium is not recycled and 19 percent less if the reprocessed uranium is recycledmore »
- Authors:
-
- Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States). Nuclear Systems Design and Analysis Division
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1367871
- Report Number(s):
- INL/JOU-16-40546
Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5450
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC07-05ID14517
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Nuclear Technology
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 198; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5450
- Publisher:
- American Nuclear Society (ANS)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS; Reprocessed Uranium; Transurancics in PWRS; Uranium management; Plutonium; TRU; Recycling; PWR
Citation Formats
Youinou, Gilles J. Impact of Reprocessed Uranium Management on the Homogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in PWRs. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1080/00295450.2017.1305191.
Youinou, Gilles J. Impact of Reprocessed Uranium Management on the Homogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in PWRs. United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1305191
Youinou, Gilles J. Thu .
"Impact of Reprocessed Uranium Management on the Homogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in PWRs". United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1305191. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1367871.
@article{osti_1367871,
title = {Impact of Reprocessed Uranium Management on the Homogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in PWRs},
author = {Youinou, Gilles J.},
abstractNote = {This article presents the results of a neutronics analysis related to the homogeneous recycling of transuranics (TRU) in PWRs with a MOX fuel using enriched uranium instead of depleted uranium. It also addresses an often, if not always, overlooked aspect related to the recycling of TRU in PWRs, namely the use of reprocessed uranium. From a neutronics point of view, it is possible to multi-recycle the entirety of the plutonium with or without neptunium and americium in a PWR fleet using MOX-EU fuel in between one third and two thirds of the fleet. Recycling neptunium and americium with plutonium significantly decreases the decay heat of the waste stream between 100 to 1,000 years compared to those of an open fuel cycle or when only plutonium is recycled. The uranium present in MOX-EU used fuel still contains a significant amount of 235uranium and recycling it makes a major difference on the natural uranium needs. For example, a PWR fleet recycling its plutonium, neptunium and americium in MOXEU needs 28 percent more natural uranium than a reference UO2 open cycle fleet generating the same energy if the reprocessed uranium is not recycled and 19 percent less if the reprocessed uranium is recycled back in the reactors, i.e. a 47 percent difference.},
doi = {10.1080/00295450.2017.1305191},
journal = {Nuclear Technology},
number = 2,
volume = 198,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu May 04 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Thu May 04 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Impact of spread in minor actinide data from ENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VI.8, JENDL-3.3 and JEFF-3.0 on an IAEA-CRP FBR benchmark for MA incineration
journal, August 2008
- Pandikumar, G.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Mohanakrishnan, P.
- Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 35, Issue 8
Core Modification to Improve Irradiation Efficiency of the Experimental Fast Reactor Joyo
journal, April 2011
- Maeda, Shigetaka; Yamamoto, Masaya; Soga, Tomonori
- Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 4