skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: Building energy information systems: Synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses

Building energy information systems (EIS) are a powerful customer-facing monitoring and analytical technology that can enable up to 20% site energy savings for buildings. Few technologies are as heavily marketed, but in spite of their potential, EIS remain an under-adopted emerging technology. One reason is the lack of information on purchase costs and associated energy savings. While insightful, the growing body of individual case studies has not provided industry the information needed to establish the business case for investment. Vastly different energy and economic metrics prevent generalizable conclusions. This paper addresses three common questions concerning EIS use: what are the costs, what have users saved, and which best practices drive deeper savings? We present a large-scale assessment of the value proposition for EIS use based on data from over two-dozen organizations. Participants achieved year-over-year median site and portfolio savings of 17% and 8%, respectively; they reported that this performance would not have been possible without the EIS. The median five-year cost of EIS software ownership (up-front and ongoing costs) was calculated to be $1,800 per monitoring point (kilowatt meter points were most common), with a median portfolio-wide implementation size of approximately 200 points. In this paper, we present an analysismore » of the relationship between key implementation factors and achieved energy reductions. Extent of efficiency projects, building energy performance prior to EIS installation, depth of metering, and duration of EIS were strongly correlated with greater savings. As a result, we also identify the best practices use of EIS associated with greater energy savings.« less
Authors:
 [1] ;  [1]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
LBNL-1006431
Journal ID: ISSN 1570-646X; ir:1006431
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Energy Efficiency
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 9; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 1570-646X
Publisher:
Springer
Research Org:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
Building Technology & Urban Systems; USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Building Technologies Office (EE-5B)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; energy efficiency; energy information systems; commercial buildings; costs and savings; best practices
OSTI Identifier:
1363638
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1379100

Granderson, Jessica, and Lin, Guanjing. Building energy information systems: Synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses. United States: N. p., Web. doi:10.1007/s12053-016-9428-9.
Granderson, Jessica, & Lin, Guanjing. Building energy information systems: Synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses. United States. doi:10.1007/s12053-016-9428-9.
Granderson, Jessica, and Lin, Guanjing. 2016. "Building energy information systems: Synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses". United States. doi:10.1007/s12053-016-9428-9. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1363638.
@article{osti_1363638,
title = {Building energy information systems: Synthesis of costs, savings, and best-practice uses},
author = {Granderson, Jessica and Lin, Guanjing},
abstractNote = {Building energy information systems (EIS) are a powerful customer-facing monitoring and analytical technology that can enable up to 20% site energy savings for buildings. Few technologies are as heavily marketed, but in spite of their potential, EIS remain an under-adopted emerging technology. One reason is the lack of information on purchase costs and associated energy savings. While insightful, the growing body of individual case studies has not provided industry the information needed to establish the business case for investment. Vastly different energy and economic metrics prevent generalizable conclusions. This paper addresses three common questions concerning EIS use: what are the costs, what have users saved, and which best practices drive deeper savings? We present a large-scale assessment of the value proposition for EIS use based on data from over two-dozen organizations. Participants achieved year-over-year median site and portfolio savings of 17% and 8%, respectively; they reported that this performance would not have been possible without the EIS. The median five-year cost of EIS software ownership (up-front and ongoing costs) was calculated to be $1,800 per monitoring point (kilowatt meter points were most common), with a median portfolio-wide implementation size of approximately 200 points. In this paper, we present an analysis of the relationship between key implementation factors and achieved energy reductions. Extent of efficiency projects, building energy performance prior to EIS installation, depth of metering, and duration of EIS were strongly correlated with greater savings. As a result, we also identify the best practices use of EIS associated with greater energy savings.},
doi = {10.1007/s12053-016-9428-9},
journal = {Energy Efficiency},
number = 6,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {2}
}