skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: A comparison of simple global kinetic models for coal devolatilization with the CPD model

Simulations of coal combustors and gasifiers generally cannot incorporate the complexities of advanced pyrolysis models, and hence there is interest in evaluating simpler models over ranges of temperature and heating rate that are applicable to the furnace of interest. In this paper, six different simple model forms are compared to predictions made by the Chemical Percolation Devolatilization (CPD) model. The model forms included three modified one-step models, a simple two-step model, and two new modified two-step models. These simple model forms were compared over a wide range of heating rates (5 × 10 3 to 10 6 K/s) at final temperatures up to 1600 K. Comparisons were made of total volatiles yield as a function of temperature, as well as the ultimate volatiles yield. Advantages and disadvantages for each simple model form are discussed. In conclusion, a modified two-step model with distributed activation energies seems to give the best agreement with CPD model predictions (with the fewest tunable parameters).
Authors:
 [1] ;  [1]
  1. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT (United States)
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
DOE-UTAH-DENA-0002375-FLETCHER-0008; DOE-UTAH-RICHARDS-0002
Journal ID: ISSN 0016-2361; PII: S0016236116306986
Grant/Contract Number:
NA0002375
Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Fuel
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 185; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0016-2361
Publisher:
Elsevier
Research Org:
Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; coal pyrolysis; coal-fired boilers; CPD modeling; heating rates
OSTI Identifier:
1362067
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1396663