skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Select strengths and biases of models in representing the Arctic winter boundary layer over sea ice: the Larcform 1 single column model intercomparison

Abstract

We struggle to represent lower tropospheric temperature and moisture profiles and surface fluxes in Artic winter using weather and climate models, partly because they lack or misrepresent physical processes that are specific to high latitudes. Observations have revealed two preferred states of the Arctic winter boundary layer. In the cloudy state, cloud liquid water limits surface radiative cooling, and temperature inversions are weak and elevated. In the radiatively clear state, strong surface radiative cooling leads to the build-up of surface-based temperature inversions. Many large-scale models lack the cloudy state, and some substantially underestimate inversion strength in the clear state. The transformation from a moist to a cold dry air mass is modeled using an idealized Lagrangian perspective. The trajectory includes both boundary layer states, and the single-column experiment is the first Lagrangian Arctic air formation experiment (Larcform 1) organized within GEWEX GASS (Global atmospheric system studies). The intercomparison reproduces the typical biases of large-scale models: some models lack the cloudy state of the boundary layer due to the representation of mixed-phase microphysics or to the interaction between micro- and macrophysics. In some models, high emissivities of ice clouds or the lack of an insulating snow layer prevent the build-up ofmore » surface-based inversions in the radiatively clear state. Models substantially disagree on the amount of cloud liquid water in the cloudy state and on turbulent heat fluxes under clear skies. Finally, observations of air mass transformations including both boundary layer states would allow for a tighter constraint of model behavior.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [2];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [8];  [4];  [9];  [10]
  1. Univ. of Reading (United Kingdom). Dept. of Meteorology
  2. NASA Goddard Inst. for Space Studies (GISS), New York, NY (United States)
  3. Univ. of Colorado and NOAA Earth System Research Lab., Boulder, CO (United States). Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)
  4. Stockholm Univ. (Sweden). Dept. of Meteorology
  5. ETH Zurich (Switzerland). Inst. for Atmosphere and Climate
  6. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
  7. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECNWF), Reading (United Kingdom)
  8. Wageningen Univ. (Netherlands). Meteorology and Air Quality Section
  9. NWP Research Center (RPN), Dorval, QC (Canada)
  10. Recherche en Prévision Numérique Atmosphérique, Environment Canada, Dorval Quebec Canada
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), Boulder, CO (United States); University of Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); National Science Foundation (NSF); Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO); National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA); European Research Council (ERC)
OSTI Identifier:
1360737
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1377370
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC02-97ER62402; GAP-654492; 863.10.010; 829.09.005
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 8; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 1942-2466
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Pithan, Felix, Ackerman, Andrew, Angevine, Wayne M., Hartung, Kerstin, Ickes, Luisa, Kelley, Maxwell, Medeiros, Brian, Sandu, Irina, Steeneveld, Gert-Jan, Sterk, H. A. M., Svensson, Gunilla, Vaillancourt, Paul A., and Zadra, Ayrton. Select strengths and biases of models in representing the Arctic winter boundary layer over sea ice: the Larcform 1 single column model intercomparison. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/2016MS000630.
Pithan, Felix, Ackerman, Andrew, Angevine, Wayne M., Hartung, Kerstin, Ickes, Luisa, Kelley, Maxwell, Medeiros, Brian, Sandu, Irina, Steeneveld, Gert-Jan, Sterk, H. A. M., Svensson, Gunilla, Vaillancourt, Paul A., & Zadra, Ayrton. Select strengths and biases of models in representing the Arctic winter boundary layer over sea ice: the Larcform 1 single column model intercomparison. United States. doi:10.1002/2016MS000630.
Pithan, Felix, Ackerman, Andrew, Angevine, Wayne M., Hartung, Kerstin, Ickes, Luisa, Kelley, Maxwell, Medeiros, Brian, Sandu, Irina, Steeneveld, Gert-Jan, Sterk, H. A. M., Svensson, Gunilla, Vaillancourt, Paul A., and Zadra, Ayrton. Sat . "Select strengths and biases of models in representing the Arctic winter boundary layer over sea ice: the Larcform 1 single column model intercomparison". United States. doi:10.1002/2016MS000630. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1360737.
@article{osti_1360737,
title = {Select strengths and biases of models in representing the Arctic winter boundary layer over sea ice: the Larcform 1 single column model intercomparison},
author = {Pithan, Felix and Ackerman, Andrew and Angevine, Wayne M. and Hartung, Kerstin and Ickes, Luisa and Kelley, Maxwell and Medeiros, Brian and Sandu, Irina and Steeneveld, Gert-Jan and Sterk, H. A. M. and Svensson, Gunilla and Vaillancourt, Paul A. and Zadra, Ayrton},
abstractNote = {We struggle to represent lower tropospheric temperature and moisture profiles and surface fluxes in Artic winter using weather and climate models, partly because they lack or misrepresent physical processes that are specific to high latitudes. Observations have revealed two preferred states of the Arctic winter boundary layer. In the cloudy state, cloud liquid water limits surface radiative cooling, and temperature inversions are weak and elevated. In the radiatively clear state, strong surface radiative cooling leads to the build-up of surface-based temperature inversions. Many large-scale models lack the cloudy state, and some substantially underestimate inversion strength in the clear state. The transformation from a moist to a cold dry air mass is modeled using an idealized Lagrangian perspective. The trajectory includes both boundary layer states, and the single-column experiment is the first Lagrangian Arctic air formation experiment (Larcform 1) organized within GEWEX GASS (Global atmospheric system studies). The intercomparison reproduces the typical biases of large-scale models: some models lack the cloudy state of the boundary layer due to the representation of mixed-phase microphysics or to the interaction between micro- and macrophysics. In some models, high emissivities of ice clouds or the lack of an insulating snow layer prevent the build-up of surface-based inversions in the radiatively clear state. Models substantially disagree on the amount of cloud liquid water in the cloudy state and on turbulent heat fluxes under clear skies. Finally, observations of air mass transformations including both boundary layer states would allow for a tighter constraint of model behavior.},
doi = {10.1002/2016MS000630},
journal = {Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems},
number = 3,
volume = 8,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {8}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Medium-Range Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts from Canada’s New 33-km Deterministic Global Operational System
journal, June 2009

  • Bélair, Stéphane; Roch, Michel; Leduc, Anne-Marie
  • Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 24, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008WAF2222175.1

Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM
journal, January 2007

  • Lohmann, U.; Stier, P.; Hoose, C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007

Ubiquitous low‐level liquid‐containing Arctic clouds: New observations and climate model constraints from CALIPSO‐GOCCP
journal, October 2012

  • Cesana, G.; Kay, J. E.; Chepfer, H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053385

Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties Derived from Surface-Based Sensors at SHEBA
journal, February 2006

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Matrosov, Sergey Y.; Uttal, Taneil
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 63, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3659.1

Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds
journal, December 2011

  • Morrison, Hugh; de Boer, Gijs; Feingold, Graham
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1332

Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions
journal, March 2014

  • Ovchinnikov, Mikhail; Ackerman, Andrew S.; Avramov, Alexander
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000282

On the Relationship between Thermodynamic Structure and Cloud Top, and Its Climate Significance in the Arctic
journal, April 2012

  • Sedlar, Joseph; Shupe, Matthew D.; Tjernström, Michael
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00186.1

Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models
journal, February 2014

  • Pithan, Felix; Mauritsen, Thorsten
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2071

The Role of Moist Intrusions in Winter Arctic Warming and Sea Ice Decline
journal, June 2016


Cooling in the Lower Atmosphere and the Structure of Polar Continental air
journal, April 1936


Contributions of Clouds, Surface Albedos, and Mixed-Phase Ice Nucleation Schemes to Arctic Radiation Biases in CAM5
journal, July 2014

  • English, Jason M.; Kay, Jennifer E.; Gettelman, Andrew
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00608.1

The vertical structure of the lower Arctic troposphere analysed from observations and the ERA-40 reanalysis
journal, January 2009

  • Tjernström, Michael; Graversen, Rune Grand
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 639
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.380

Single-Column Model Intercomparison for a Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer
journal, September 2005


On the Arctic Wintertime Climate in Global Climate Models
journal, November 2011


The 15‐km version of the Canadian regional forecast system
journal, June 2006

  • Mailhot, Jocelyn; Bélair, Stephane; Lefaivre, Louis
  • Atmosphere-Ocean, Vol. 44, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3137/ao.440202

A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation
journal, January 2004


Mixed-phase clouds cause climate model biases in Arctic wintertime temperature inversions
journal, October 2013


Large-scale circulation associated with moisture intrusions into the Arctic during winter: MOISTURE INTRUSIONS DURING ARCTIC WINTER
journal, September 2013

  • Woods, Cian; Caballero, Rodrigo; Svensson, Gunilla
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50912

Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6: ECHAM6
journal, April 2013

  • Stevens, Bjorn; Giorgetta, Marco; Esch, Monika
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20015

A GCSS Boundary-Layer Cloud Model Intercomparison Study Of The First Astex Lagrangian Experiment
journal, December 1999

  • Bretherton, Christopher S.; Krueger, Steven K.; Wyant, Matthew C.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 93, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1002005429969

Arctic Inversion Strength in Climate Models
journal, September 2011

  • Medeiros, Brian; Deser, Clara; Tomas, Robert A.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI3968.1

Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower at SHEBA: Near-surface conditions and surface energy budget
journal, January 2002


Climatological Characteristics of Arctic and Antarctic Surface-Based Inversions
journal, October 2011

  • Zhang, Yehui; Seidel, Dian J.; Golaz, Jean-Christophe
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4004.1

Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models
journal, January 2008

  • Iacono, Michael J.; Delamere, Jennifer S.; Mlawer, Eli J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD009944

Synoptically Driven Arctic Winter States
journal, March 2011

  • Stramler, Kirstie; Del Genio, Anthony D.; Rossow, William B.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3817.1

Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive: GISS MODEL-E2 CMIP5 SIMULATIONS
journal, March 2014

  • Schmidt, Gavin A.; Kelley, Max; Nazarenko, Larissa
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000265

An Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Stable Boundary Layer
journal, February 2006

  • Beare, Robert J.; Macvean, Malcolm K.; Holtslag, Albert A. M.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 118, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10546-004-2820-6

A FIRE-ACE/SHEBA Case Study of Mixed-Phase Arctic Boundary Layer Clouds: Entrainment Rate Limitations on Rapid Primary Ice Nucleation Processes
journal, January 2012

  • Fridlind, Ann M.; van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan; Ackerman, Andrew S.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 69, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-052.1

The role of snow-surface coupling, radiation, and turbulent mixing in modeling a stable boundary layer over Arctic sea ice: MODELING A CLEAR-SKY ARCTIC SBL
journal, February 2013

  • Sterk, H. A. M.; Steeneveld, G. J.; Holtslag, A. A. M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50158

Radiation Fog: A Comparison of Model Simulation with Detailed Observations
journal, February 1991


Advancing Polar Prediction Capabilities on Daily to Seasonal Time Scales
journal, September 2016

  • Jung, Thomas; Gordon, Neil D.; Bauer, Peter
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 97, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00246.1

A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content
journal, July 1978

  • Sundqvist, Hilding
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 104, Issue 441
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49710444110

The GASS/EUCLIPSE model intercomparison of the stratocumulus transition as observed during ASTEX: LES results: Astex SCU Transition-LES Results
journal, July 2013

  • van der Dussen, J. J.; de Roode, S. R.; Ackerman, A. S.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20033

The Effects of Doubling the CO 2 Concentration on the climate of a General Circulation Model
journal, January 1975


On the Formation of Continental Polar Air
journal, September 1983


Quality careers education
journal, May 2012


A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content
journal, July 1978

  • Sundqvist, Hilding
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 104, Issue 441
  • DOI: 10.1256/smsqj.44109

Larcform 1 - single column model intercomparison of Arctic air formation, link to model results in NetCDF format
dataset, January 2016

  • Pithan, Felix; Ackerman, Andrew; Angevine, Wayne
  • PANGAEA, Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science, 9110.0 kBytes
  • DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.856770

    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Vertical thermodynamic structure of the troposphere during the Norwegian young sea ICE expedition (N-ICE2015): RADIOSONDE OBSERVATIONS DURING N-ICE2015
    journal, October 2017

    • Kayser, Markus; Maturilli, Marion; Graham, Robert M.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 20
    • DOI: 10.1002/2016jd026089

    The 15‐km version of the Canadian regional forecast system
    journal, June 2006

    • Mailhot, Jocelyn; Bélair, Stephane; Lefaivre, Louis
    • Atmosphere-Ocean, Vol. 44, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.3137/ao.440202

    The role of snow-surface coupling, radiation, and turbulent mixing in modeling a stable boundary layer over Arctic sea ice: MODELING A CLEAR-SKY ARCTIC SBL
    journal, February 2013

    • Sterk, H. A. M.; Steeneveld, G. J.; Holtslag, A. A. M.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50158

    Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6: ECHAM6
    journal, April 2013

    • Stevens, Bjorn; Giorgetta, Marco; Esch, Monika
    • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20015

    Large-scale circulation associated with moisture intrusions into the Arctic during winter: MOISTURE INTRUSIONS DURING ARCTIC WINTER
    journal, September 2013

    • Woods, Cian; Caballero, Rodrigo; Svensson, Gunilla
    • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 17
    • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50912

    Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models
    journal, February 2014

    • Pithan, Felix; Mauritsen, Thorsten
    • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2071

    Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds
    journal, December 2011

    • Morrison, Hugh; de Boer, Gijs; Feingold, Graham
    • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1332

    A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content
    journal, July 1978

    • Sundqvist, Hilding
    • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 104, Issue 441
    • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49710444110

    An Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Stable Boundary Layer
    journal, February 2006

    • Beare, Robert J.; Macvean, Malcolm K.; Holtslag, Albert A. M.
    • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 118, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1007/s10546-004-2820-6

    Mixed-phase clouds cause climate model biases in Arctic wintertime temperature inversions
    journal, October 2013


    The GASS/EUCLIPSE model intercomparison of the stratocumulus transition as observed during ASTEX: LES results: Astex SCU Transition-LES Results
    journal, July 2013

    • van der Dussen, J. J.; de Roode, S. R.; Ackerman, A. S.
    • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20033

    The vertical structure of the lower Arctic troposphere analysed from observations and the ERA-40 reanalysis
    journal, January 2009

    • Tjernström, Michael; Graversen, Rune Grand
    • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 639
    • DOI: 10.1002/qj.380

    The influence of Arctic amplification on mid-latitude summer circulation
    journal, August 2018


    Larcform 1 - single column model intercomparison of Arctic air formation, link to model results in NetCDF format
    dataset, January 2016

    • Pithan, Felix; Ackerman, Andrew; Angevine, Wayne
    • PANGAEA, Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science, 9110.0 kBytes
    • DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.856770

    Single-Column Model Intercomparison for a Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer
    journal, September 2005


    Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    journal, January 2007

    • Lohmann, U.; Stier, P.; Hoose, C.
    • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 13
    • DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007

    Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions
    journal, May 2018


    A comparison of the two Arctic atmospheric winter states observed during N‐ICE2015 and SHEBA
    journal, June 2017

    • Graham, Robert M.; Rinke, Annette; Cohen, Lana
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 11
    • DOI: 10.1002/2016jd025475

    Vertical thermodynamic structure of the troposphere during the Norwegian young sea ICE expedition (N-ICE2015): RADIOSONDE OBSERVATIONS DURING N-ICE2015
    journal, October 2017

    • Kayser, Markus; Maturilli, Marion; Graham, Robert M.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 20
    • DOI: 10.1002/2016jd026089

    Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions
    journal, May 2018


    The influence of Arctic amplification on mid-latitude summer circulation
    journal, August 2018


    Larcform 1 - single column model intercomparison of Arctic air formation, link to model results in NetCDF format
    dataset, January 2016

    • Pithan, Felix; Ackerman, Andrew; Angevine, Wayne
    • PANGAEA, Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science, 9110.0 kBytes
    • DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.856770