Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells

Chen, Dafen; Jiang, Jiuchun; Kim, Gi-Heon; Yang, Chuanbo; Pesaran, Ahmad

doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015

Title: Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells

Full Record
Other Related Research

Authors:

; Jiang, Jiuchun; Kim, Gi-Heon; Yang, Chuanbo; Pesaran, Ahmad

Publication Date:: Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE

OSTI Identifier:: 1358786

Resource Type:: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: Applied Thermal Engineering

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Name: Applied Thermal Engineering Journal Volume: 94 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1359-4311

Publisher:: Elsevier

Country of Publication:: United Kingdom

Language:: English

Citation Formats


                    Chen, Dafen, Jiang, Jiuchun, Kim, Gi-Heon, Yang, Chuanbo, and Pesaran, Ahmad. Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells.  United Kingdom: N. p., 2016. 
Web.  doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015.

Copy to clipboard


                    Chen, Dafen, Jiang, Jiuchun, Kim, Gi-Heon, Yang, Chuanbo, & Pesaran, Ahmad. Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells.  United Kingdom.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015

Copy to clipboard


                    Chen, Dafen, Jiang, Jiuchun, Kim, Gi-Heon, Yang, Chuanbo, and Pesaran, Ahmad. Mon .  
"Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells".  United Kingdom.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1358786,

  title        = {Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells},

  author       = {Chen, Dafen and Jiang, Jiuchun and Kim, Gi-Heon and Yang, Chuanbo and Pesaran, Ahmad},

  abstractNote = {},

  doi          = {10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015},

  journal      = {Applied Thermal Engineering},

  number       = C,

  volume       = 94,

  place        = {United Kingdom},

  year         = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016},

  month        = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 335 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells

Journal Article Chen, Dafen ; Jiang, Jiuchun ; Kim, Gi-Heon ; ... - Applied Thermal Engineering

Choosing a proper cooling method for a lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery pack for electric drive vehicles (EDVs) and making an optimal cooling control strategy to keep the temperature at a optimal range of 15 degrees C to 35 degrees C is essential to increasing safety, extending the pack service life, and reducing costs. When choosing a cooling method and developing strategies, trade-offs need to be made among many facets such as costs, complexity, weight, cooling effects, temperature uniformity, and parasitic power. This paper considers four cell-cooling methods: air cooling, direct liquid cooling, indirect liquid cooling, and fin cooling. To evaluate theirmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015
Tris(trimethylsilyl) phosphite (TMSPi) and triethyl phosphite (TEPi) as electrolyte additives for lithium ion batteries: Mechanistic insights into differences during LiNi_0.5Mn_0.3Co_0.2O₂- Graphite full cell cycling

Journal Article Peebles, Cameron ; Sahore, Ritu ; Gilbert, James A. ; ... - Journal of the Electrochemical Society

Here, tris(trimethylsilyl) phosphite (TMSPi) has emerged as an useful electrolyte additive for lithium ion cells. This work examines the use of TMSPi and a structurally analogous compound, triethyl phosphite (TEPi), in LiNi_0.5Mn_0.3Co_0.2O₂-graphite full cells, containing a (baseline) electrolyte with 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC: EMC (3:7 w/w) and operating between 3.0-4.4 V. Galvanostatic cycling data reveal a measurable difference in capacity fade between the TMSPi and TEPi cells. Furthermore, lower impedance rise is observed for the TMSPi cells, because of the formation of a P-and O-rich surface film on the positive electrode that was revealed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data.more »« less
Cited by 55
https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1101707jes

Full Text Available
Overcharge-to-thermal-runaway behavior and safety assessment of commercial lithium-ion cells with different cathode materials: A comparison study

Journal Article Wang, Zhenpo ; Yuan, Jing ; Zhu, Xiaoqing ; ... - Journal of Energy Chemistry

In this paper, overcharge behaviors and thermal runaway (TR) features of large format lithium-ion (Li-ion) cells with different cathode materials (LiFePO₄ (LFP), Li[Ni_1/3Co_1/3Mn_1/3]O₂ (NCM111), Li[Ni_0.6Co_0.2Mn_0.2]O₂ (NCM622) and Li[Ni_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1]O₂ (NCM811)) were investigated. The results showed that, under the same overcharge condition, the TR of LFP Li-ion cell occurred earlier compared with the NCM Li-ion cells, indicating its poor overcharge tolerance and high TR risk. However, when TR occurred, LFP Li-ion cell exhibited lower maximum temperature and mild TR response. All NCM Li-ion cells caught fire or exploded during TR, while the LFP Li-ion cell only released a large amount of smokemore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.028

Full Text Available
A Comparison of Image-Based Meshing Methods on Geometry and Transport Properties of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrode Reconstructions.

Conference Trembacki, Bradley ; Noble, David R. ; Roberts, Scott Alan

Abstract not provided.
Full Text Available
The Effect of Cell Geometry and Trigger Method on the Risks Associated with Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal Article Walker, William Q. ; Cooper, Kylie ; Hughes, Peter ; ... - Journal of Power Sources

Consideration of thermal runaway heat output variability is paramount for the development of safe lithium-ion battery assemblies. This study utilizes data gathered from fractional thermal runaway calorimetry (FTRC) experiments to conduct a comparative analysis of thermal runaway heat output for three cell formats (18650, 21700, and 33600) as a function of trigger method (heaters, internal short-circuiting device, and nail penetration). The analysis is based on comparisons for the calculated total energy yield, fractional energy yield, heat rate, and heat flux. This study reveals that nail penetration tends to result in higher thermal runaway heat output for larger cells (21700 &more »« less
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230645

Similar Records