DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes

Abstract

The Andes is the largest undeveloped geothermal region in the world. The Chilean case is the most puzzling because the country is largely dependent on imported fuels causing, among other issues, high energy prices and energy dependency. But even though it has large quantities of geothermal resources which have been explored since the 1920s, no geothermal power plant has been constructed yet. The barriers for geothermal development in Chile have not been studied in detail and limited information is available about the real economic feasibility of geothermal power generation and whether effective incentives are needed for its development. In this study we present an integrated analysis of geoscientific, economic, historical and regulatory aspects of geothermal development in Chile based on the compilation of new and previously published data. Through a survey of key participants from government institutions, industry and academia we identified the main perceived advantages, barriers, and efficient incentives. The absence of clear medium-to-long term energy policies and a lack of government incentives for companies to overcome financial risk are perceived as the main barriers. Additionally, we calculated the estimated average Levelized Costs of Energy (LCoE) of geothermal electricity generation using different scenarios to illustrate the potential impact ofmore » possible government policies. The present conditions and without incentives we estimated a base case geothermal LCoE in Chile which would be "near competitive" compared to the average contract prices. Further analysis would be needed to estimate the effect of different policy incentives more rigorously. Finally, we propose some guidelines for geothermal stakeholders to encourage geothermal power development; these might prove useful to other Andean and developing countries as well.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [3];  [5];  [6];  [1]
  1. University of Chile, Santiago (Chile); Andean Geothermal Center of Excellence, Santiago (Chile)
  2. Pontificia University Catolica de Chile, Santiago (Chile); Andean Geothermal Center of Excellence, Santiago (Chile)
  3. University of Auckland (New Zealand)
  4. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Earth Sciences Division
  5. University of Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  6. University of Chile, Santiago (Chile); Solar Energy Research Center, Santiago (Chile)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); CONICYT FONDAP; CONICYT International Network Program; Higher Education Quality Improvement Program (MECESUP)
OSTI Identifier:
1580073
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1357691
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; UCH0708
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 51; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1364-0321
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; geothermal; barriers and incentives; LCoE; Chile; Andes; energy policies; economy

Citation Formats

Sanchez-Alfaro, Pablo, Sielfeld, Gerd, Campen, Bart Van, Dobson, Patrick, Fuentes, Víctor, Reed, Andy, Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo, and Morata, Diego. Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.001.
Sanchez-Alfaro, Pablo, Sielfeld, Gerd, Campen, Bart Van, Dobson, Patrick, Fuentes, Víctor, Reed, Andy, Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo, & Morata, Diego. Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.001
Sanchez-Alfaro, Pablo, Sielfeld, Gerd, Campen, Bart Van, Dobson, Patrick, Fuentes, Víctor, Reed, Andy, Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo, and Morata, Diego. Thu . "Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.001. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1580073.
@article{osti_1580073,
title = {Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile – Lessons for the Andes},
author = {Sanchez-Alfaro, Pablo and Sielfeld, Gerd and Campen, Bart Van and Dobson, Patrick and Fuentes, Víctor and Reed, Andy and Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo and Morata, Diego},
abstractNote = {The Andes is the largest undeveloped geothermal region in the world. The Chilean case is the most puzzling because the country is largely dependent on imported fuels causing, among other issues, high energy prices and energy dependency. But even though it has large quantities of geothermal resources which have been explored since the 1920s, no geothermal power plant has been constructed yet. The barriers for geothermal development in Chile have not been studied in detail and limited information is available about the real economic feasibility of geothermal power generation and whether effective incentives are needed for its development. In this study we present an integrated analysis of geoscientific, economic, historical and regulatory aspects of geothermal development in Chile based on the compilation of new and previously published data. Through a survey of key participants from government institutions, industry and academia we identified the main perceived advantages, barriers, and efficient incentives. The absence of clear medium-to-long term energy policies and a lack of government incentives for companies to overcome financial risk are perceived as the main barriers. Additionally, we calculated the estimated average Levelized Costs of Energy (LCoE) of geothermal electricity generation using different scenarios to illustrate the potential impact of possible government policies. The present conditions and without incentives we estimated a base case geothermal LCoE in Chile which would be "near competitive" compared to the average contract prices. Further analysis would be needed to estimate the effect of different policy incentives more rigorously. Finally, we propose some guidelines for geothermal stakeholders to encourage geothermal power development; these might prove useful to other Andean and developing countries as well.},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.001},
journal = {Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews},
number = C,
volume = 51,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jul 30 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Thu Jul 30 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 32 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A snapshot of geothermal energy potential and utilization in Turkey
journal, December 2009


Sustained Dialogue for Ground Water and Energy Resources in Chile
journal, December 2012

  • Pierce, Suzanne A.; Malin, Reed A.; Figueroa, Eugenio
  • Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, Vol. 149, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2012.03129.x

Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people
journal, September 2001


Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview
journal, January 2002


Origin of fumarolic fluids from Tupungatito Volcano (Central Chile): interplay between magmatic, hydrothermal, and shallow meteoric sources
journal, July 2013

  • Benavente, Oscar; Tassi, Franco; Gutiérrez, Francisco
  • Bulletin of Volcanology, Vol. 75, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00445-013-0746-x

Latin American electricity markets and renewable energy sources: The Argentinean and Chilean cases
journal, June 2010


Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution
journal, April 2013


Catalog of geothermal play types based on geologic controls
journal, September 2014


Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2010 worldwide review
journal, September 2011


Challenges Of Drilling In The Chilean Altiplano
conference, March 2011

  • De Angelis, Roberto; Holdeman, Matthew; Pidcock, Gary
  • All Days
  • DOI: 10.2118/140051-MS

Crustal deformation effects on the chemical evolution of geothermal systems: the intra-arc Liquiñe–Ofqui fault system, Southern Andes
journal, March 2013

  • Sánchez, Pablo; Pérez-Flores, Pamela; Arancibia, Gloria
  • International Geology Review, Vol. 55, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2013.775731

Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report
journal, January 2012


Guidebook to Geothermal Finance
report, March 2011


Systematic tool to plan and evaluate demand side strategies during sustained energy crises in hydrothermal power systems
journal, October 2015

  • Püschel-Løvengreen, Sebastián; Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo; van Campen, Bart
  • International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 71
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.03.019

Environmental Impacts and Costs of Energy
journal, September 2006

  • Rabl, A.; Spadaro, J. V.
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1076, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1196/annals.1371.059

Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation
journal, October 2003


A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity
journal, December 2011

  • Branker, K.; Pathak, M. J. M.; Pearce, J. M.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104