DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoid resection for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies trial

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is an alternative to sigmoid resection in selected patients presenting with purulent peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis. Although recent trials have lacked superiority for lavage in terms of morbidity, mortality was not compromised, and beneficial secondary outcomes were shown. These included shorter duration of surgery, less stoma formation and less surgical reintervention (including stoma reversal) for laparoscopic lavage versus sigmoid resection respectively. The cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies RCT was assessed in the present study. Methods This study involved an economic evaluation of the randomized LOLA (LaparOscopic LAvage) arm of the Ladies trial (comparing laparoscopic lavage with sigmoid resection in patients with purulent peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis). The actual resource use per individual patient was documented prospectively and analysed (according to intention-to-treat) for up to 1 year after randomization. Results Eighty-eight patients were randomized to either laparoscopic lavage (46) or sigmoid resection (42). The total medical costs for lavage were lower (mean difference € − 3512, 95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated c.i. −16 020 to 8149). Surgical reintervention increased costs in the lavage group, whereas stoma reversal increased costs in the sigmoid resection group. Differences in favour ofmore » laparoscopy were robust when costs were varied by ±20 per cent in a sensitivity analysis (mean cost difference € − 2509 to −4438). Conclusion Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis is more cost-effective than sigmoid resection.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Electricity (OE), Advanced Grid Research & Development. Power Systems Engineering Research
OSTI Identifier:
1336956
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1348244
Grant/Contract Number:  
ZonMW 171002213
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
British Journal of Surgery
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: British Journal of Surgery Journal Volume: 104 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 0007-1323
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Vennix, S., van Dieren, S., Opmeer, B. C., Lange, J. F., and Bemelman, W. A. Cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoid resection for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies trial. United Kingdom: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/bjs.10329.
Vennix, S., van Dieren, S., Opmeer, B. C., Lange, J. F., & Bemelman, W. A. Cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoid resection for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies trial. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10329
Vennix, S., van Dieren, S., Opmeer, B. C., Lange, J. F., and Bemelman, W. A. Wed . "Cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoid resection for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies trial". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10329.
@article{osti_1336956,
title = {Cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoid resection for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies trial},
author = {Vennix, S. and van Dieren, S. and Opmeer, B. C. and Lange, J. F. and Bemelman, W. A.},
abstractNote = {Abstract Background Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is an alternative to sigmoid resection in selected patients presenting with purulent peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis. Although recent trials have lacked superiority for lavage in terms of morbidity, mortality was not compromised, and beneficial secondary outcomes were shown. These included shorter duration of surgery, less stoma formation and less surgical reintervention (including stoma reversal) for laparoscopic lavage versus sigmoid resection respectively. The cost analysis of laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the Ladies RCT was assessed in the present study. Methods This study involved an economic evaluation of the randomized LOLA (LaparOscopic LAvage) arm of the Ladies trial (comparing laparoscopic lavage with sigmoid resection in patients with purulent peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis). The actual resource use per individual patient was documented prospectively and analysed (according to intention-to-treat) for up to 1 year after randomization. Results Eighty-eight patients were randomized to either laparoscopic lavage (46) or sigmoid resection (42). The total medical costs for lavage were lower (mean difference € − 3512, 95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated c.i. −16 020 to 8149). Surgical reintervention increased costs in the lavage group, whereas stoma reversal increased costs in the sigmoid resection group. Differences in favour of laparoscopy were robust when costs were varied by ±20 per cent in a sensitivity analysis (mean cost difference € − 2509 to −4438). Conclusion Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis is more cost-effective than sigmoid resection.},
doi = {10.1002/bjs.10329},
journal = {British Journal of Surgery},
number = 1,
volume = 104,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Wed Dec 21 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Wed Dec 21 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10329

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 19 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Burden of Gastrointestinal Disease in the United States: 2012 Update
journal, November 2012


Diverticular disease of the colon in Europe: epidemiology, impact on citizen health and prevention
journal, November 2003


Conventional and Laparoscopic Reversal of the Hartmann Procedure: a Review of Literature
journal, November 2009

  • van de Wall, Bryan Joost Marinus; Draaisma, Werner A.; Schouten, Esther S.
  • Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 14, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1084-3

Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap
journal, January 2000


Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery on Health Care Utilization and Costs in Patients Who Undergo Colectomy
journal, May 2015


Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis
journal, December 2007

  • Myers, E.; Hurley, M.; O'Sullivan, G. C.
  • British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 95, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6024

Patterns of recurrence in patients with acute diverticulitis
journal, April 2010

  • Eglinton, T.; Nguyen, T.; Raniga, S.
  • British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 97, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7035

Long-term outcome in 445 patients after diagnosis of diverticular disease
journal, June 2007


Incidence of perforated diverticulitis and risk factors for death in a UK population
journal, January 2008

  • Morris, C. R.; Harvey, I. M.; Stebbings, W. S. L.
  • British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 95, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6226

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Primary Anastomosis or Hartmannʼs Procedure for Perforated Left Colonic Diverticulitis With Purulent or Fecal Peritonitis
journal, January 2012

  • Oberkofler, Christian Eugen; Rickenbacher, Andreas; Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
  • Annals of Surgery, Vol. 256, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827324ba

Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study)
journal, June 2014

  • Bartels, S. A. L.; Vlug, M. S.; Hollmann, M. W.
  • British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 101, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9585

Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: The SCANDIV Randomized Clinical Trial
journal, October 2015


Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review: Laparoscopic lavage for diverticulitis
journal, September 2009


Significant reduction in the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic compared to open segmental colorectal resection
journal, April 2015

  • Klaristenfeld, Daniel D.; McLemore, Elisabeth C.; Li, Bonnie H.
  • Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, Vol. 400, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00423-015-1301-3

Laparoscopic management of generalized peritonitis due to perforated colonic diverticula
journal, April 1996

  • O'Sullivan, Gerald C.; Murphy, Dermot; O'Brien, Michael G.
  • The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 171, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89625-0