skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures

Challenging bathymetry and soil conditions of future US offshore wind power plants might promote the use of multimember, fixed-bottom structures (or 'jackets') in place of monopiles. Support structures affect costs associated with the balance of system and operation and maintenance. Understanding the link between these costs and the main environmental design drivers is crucial in the quest for a lower levelized cost of energy, and it is the main rationale for this work. Actual cost and engineering data are still scarce; hence, we evaluated a simplified engineering approach to tie key site and turbine parameters (e.g. water depth, wave height, tower-head mass, hub height and generator rating) to the overall support weight. A jacket-and-tower sizing tool, part of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's system engineering software suite, was utilized to achieve mass-optimized support structures for 81 different configurations. This tool set provides preliminary sizing of all jacket components. Results showed reasonable agreement with the available industry data, and that the jacket mass is mainly driven by water depth, but hub height and tower-head mass become more influential at greater turbine ratings. A larger sensitivity of the structural mass to wave height and target eigenfrequency was observed for the deepest watermore » conditions (>40 m). Thus, techno-economic analyses using this model should be based on accurate estimates of actual metocean conditions and turbine parameters especially for deep waters. Finally, the relationships derived from this study will inform National Renewable Energy Laboratory's offshore balance of system cost model, and they will be used to evaluate the impact of changes in technology on offshore wind lower levelized cost of energy.« less
Authors:
 [1] ; ORCiD logo [2] ;  [1] ;  [1] ;  [1]
  1. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  2. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT (United States)
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-66252
Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308; 36-08GO28308
Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Wind Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 20; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Publisher:
Wiley
Research Org:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Wind and Water Technologies Office (EE-4W)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
17 WIND ENERGY; offshore wind; jacket substructure; mass sensitivity to environmental variables; balance of system; cost analysis
OSTI Identifier:
1348156
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1400795

Damiani, Rick, Ning, Andrew, Maples, Ben, Smith, Aaron, and Dykes, Katherine. Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures. United States: N. p., Web. doi:10.1002/we.2021.
Damiani, Rick, Ning, Andrew, Maples, Ben, Smith, Aaron, & Dykes, Katherine. Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures. United States. doi:10.1002/we.2021.
Damiani, Rick, Ning, Andrew, Maples, Ben, Smith, Aaron, and Dykes, Katherine. 2016. "Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures". United States. doi:10.1002/we.2021. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1348156.
@article{osti_1348156,
title = {Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures},
author = {Damiani, Rick and Ning, Andrew and Maples, Ben and Smith, Aaron and Dykes, Katherine},
abstractNote = {Challenging bathymetry and soil conditions of future US offshore wind power plants might promote the use of multimember, fixed-bottom structures (or 'jackets') in place of monopiles. Support structures affect costs associated with the balance of system and operation and maintenance. Understanding the link between these costs and the main environmental design drivers is crucial in the quest for a lower levelized cost of energy, and it is the main rationale for this work. Actual cost and engineering data are still scarce; hence, we evaluated a simplified engineering approach to tie key site and turbine parameters (e.g. water depth, wave height, tower-head mass, hub height and generator rating) to the overall support weight. A jacket-and-tower sizing tool, part of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's system engineering software suite, was utilized to achieve mass-optimized support structures for 81 different configurations. This tool set provides preliminary sizing of all jacket components. Results showed reasonable agreement with the available industry data, and that the jacket mass is mainly driven by water depth, but hub height and tower-head mass become more influential at greater turbine ratings. A larger sensitivity of the structural mass to wave height and target eigenfrequency was observed for the deepest water conditions (>40 m). Thus, techno-economic analyses using this model should be based on accurate estimates of actual metocean conditions and turbine parameters especially for deep waters. Finally, the relationships derived from this study will inform National Renewable Energy Laboratory's offshore balance of system cost model, and they will be used to evaluate the impact of changes in technology on offshore wind lower levelized cost of energy.},
doi = {10.1002/we.2021},
journal = {Wind Energy},
number = 4,
volume = 20,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {9}
}