skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I

Abstract

Drop-in biofuels that are 'functionally identical to petroleum fuels and fully compatible with existing infrastructure' are needed for sectors such as aviation where biofuels such as bioethanol/biodiesel cannot be used. The technologies used to produce drop-in biofuels can be grouped into the four categories: oleochemical, thermochemical, biochemical, and hybrid technologies. Commercial volumes of conventional drop-in biofuels are currently produced through the oleochemical pathway, to make products such as renewable diesel and biojet fuel. However, the cost, sustainability, and availability of the lipid/fatty acid feedstocks are significant challenges that need to be addressed. In the longer-term, it is likely that commercial growth in drop-in biofuels will be based on lignocellulosic feedstocks. However, these technologies have been slow to develop and have been hampered by several technoeconomic challenges. For example, the gasification/Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis route suffers from high capital costs and economies of scale difficulties, while the economical production of high quality syngas remains a significant challenge. Although pyrolysis/hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) based technologies are promising, the upgrading of pyrolysis oils to higher specification fuels has encountered several technical challenges, such as high catalyst cost and short catalyst lifespan. Biochemical routes to drop-in fuels have the advantage of producing single molecules with simplemore » chemistry. Moreover, the high value of these molecules in other markets such as renewable chemical precursors and fragrances will limit their use for fuel. In the near-term, (1-5 years) it is likely that, 'conventional' drop-in biofuels will be produced predominantly via the oleochemical route, due to the relative simplicity and maturity of this pathway.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC (Canada)
  2. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (EE-3B)
OSTI Identifier:
1346341
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5100-67681
Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 11; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; drop-in biofuels; bioconversion; thermochemical/biochemical conversion; conventional/advanced biofuels; biojet

Citation Formats

Karatzos, Sergios, van Dyk, J. Susan, McMillan, James D., and Saddler, Jack. Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1002/bbb.1746.
Karatzos, Sergios, van Dyk, J. Susan, McMillan, James D., & Saddler, Jack. Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I. United States. doi:10.1002/bbb.1746.
Karatzos, Sergios, van Dyk, J. Susan, McMillan, James D., and Saddler, Jack. Mon . "Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I". United States. doi:10.1002/bbb.1746. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1346341.
@article{osti_1346341,
title = {Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I},
author = {Karatzos, Sergios and van Dyk, J. Susan and McMillan, James D. and Saddler, Jack},
abstractNote = {Drop-in biofuels that are 'functionally identical to petroleum fuels and fully compatible with existing infrastructure' are needed for sectors such as aviation where biofuels such as bioethanol/biodiesel cannot be used. The technologies used to produce drop-in biofuels can be grouped into the four categories: oleochemical, thermochemical, biochemical, and hybrid technologies. Commercial volumes of conventional drop-in biofuels are currently produced through the oleochemical pathway, to make products such as renewable diesel and biojet fuel. However, the cost, sustainability, and availability of the lipid/fatty acid feedstocks are significant challenges that need to be addressed. In the longer-term, it is likely that commercial growth in drop-in biofuels will be based on lignocellulosic feedstocks. However, these technologies have been slow to develop and have been hampered by several technoeconomic challenges. For example, the gasification/Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis route suffers from high capital costs and economies of scale difficulties, while the economical production of high quality syngas remains a significant challenge. Although pyrolysis/hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) based technologies are promising, the upgrading of pyrolysis oils to higher specification fuels has encountered several technical challenges, such as high catalyst cost and short catalyst lifespan. Biochemical routes to drop-in fuels have the advantage of producing single molecules with simple chemistry. Moreover, the high value of these molecules in other markets such as renewable chemical precursors and fragrances will limit their use for fuel. In the near-term, (1-5 years) it is likely that, 'conventional' drop-in biofuels will be produced predominantly via the oleochemical route, due to the relative simplicity and maturity of this pathway.},
doi = {10.1002/bbb.1746},
journal = {Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining},
number = 2,
volume = 11,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {1}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Catalytic conversion of biomass-derived feedstocks into olefins and aromatics with ZSM-5: the hydrogen to carbon effective ratio
journal, January 2011

  • Zhang, Huiyan; Cheng, Yu-Ting; Vispute, Tushar P.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 4, Issue 6, p. 2297-2307
  • DOI: 10.1039/c1ee01230d

Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
journal, March 2012


Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: Opportunities and challenges
journal, July 2010


Renewable Alkanes by Aqueous-Phase Reforming of Biomass-Derived Oxygenates
journal, March 2004

  • Huber, George W.; Cortright, Randy D.; Dumesic, James A.
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 43, Issue 12, p. 1549-1551
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.200353050

Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways
journal, November 2010


Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks
journal, January 2008


Trends and challenges in the microbial production of lignocellulosic bioalcohol fuels
journal, June 2010

  • Weber, Christian; Farwick, Alexander; Benisch, Feline
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 87, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2707-z

Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel
journal, October 2011


Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation
journal, December 2012

  • Daniell, James; Köpke, Michael; Simpson, Séan
  • Energies, Vol. 5, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.3390/en5125372

Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering
journal, September 2006

  • Huber, George W.; Iborra, Sara; Corma, Avelino
  • Chemical Reviews, Vol. 106, Issue 9, p. 4044-4098
  • DOI: 10.1021/cr068360d

Beyond Petrochemicals: The Renewable Chemicals Industry
journal, October 2011

  • Vennestrøm, P. N. R.; Osmundsen, C. M.; Christensen, C. H.
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 50, Issue 45
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.201102117

Second-generation biofuels: why they are taking so long: Second-generation biofuels
journal, December 2012

  • Hayes, Daniel J. M.
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 2, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/wene.59

Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water
journal, August 2002

  • Cortright, R. D.; Davda, R. R.; Dumesic, J. A.
  • Nature, Vol. 418, Issue 6901
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature01009

Effect of increased hydrogen partial pressure on the acetone-butanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum
journal, June 1985

  • Yerushalmi, L.; Volesky, B.; Szczesny, T.
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 22, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00250028

Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil-vegetable oil mixtures for biofuels production
journal, June 2009


Reactor Design Issues for Synthesis-Gas Fermentations
journal, October 1999

  • Bredwell, M. D.; Srivastava, P.; Worden, R. M.
  • Biotechnology Progress, Vol. 15, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/bp990108m

An overview of aqueous-phase catalytic processes for production of hydrogen and alkanes in a biorefinery
journal, January 2006


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Simultaneous lipid biosynthesis and recovery for oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica
    journal, October 2019

    • Pawar, Pratik Prashant; Odaneth, Annamma Anil; Vadgama, Rajeshkumar Natwarlal
    • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 12, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1576-7

    Simultaneous lipid biosynthesis and recovery for oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica
    journal, October 2019

    • Pawar, Pratik Prashant; Odaneth, Annamma Anil; Vadgama, Rajeshkumar Natwarlal
    • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 12, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1576-7