DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluation of single and multiple Doppler lidar techniques to measure complex flow during the XPIA field campaign

Abstract

Accurate three-dimensional information of wind flow fields can be an important tool in not only visualizing complex flow but also understanding the underlying physical processes and improving flow modeling. However, a thorough analysis of the measurement uncertainties is required to properly interpret results. The XPIA (eXperimental Planetary boundary layer Instrumentation Assessment) field campaign conducted at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) in Erie, CO, from 2 March to 31 May 2015 brought together a large suite of in situ and remote sensing measurement platforms to evaluate complex flow measurement strategies. In this paper, measurement uncertainties for different single and multi-Doppler strategies using simple scan geometries (conical, vertical plane and staring) are investigated. The tradeoffs (such as time–space resolution vs. spatial coverage) among the different measurement techniques are evaluated using co-located measurements made near the BAO tower. Sensitivity of the single-/multi-Doppler measurement uncertainties to averaging period are investigated using the sonic anemometers installed on the BAO tower as the standard reference. Finally, the radiometer measurements are used to partition the measurement periods as a function of atmospheric stability to determine their effect on measurement uncertainty. It was found that with an increase in spatial coverage and measurement complexity, the uncertainty in the wind measurement alsomore » increased. For multi-Doppler techniques, the increase in uncertainty for temporally uncoordinated measurements is possibly due to requiring additional assumptions of stationarity along with horizontal homogeneity and less representative line-of-sight velocity statistics. Lastly, it was also found that wind speed measurement uncertainty was lower during stable conditions compared to unstable conditions.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1341344
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1344326
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-67999
Journal ID: ISSN 1867-8548
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0011561; AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online) Journal Volume: 10 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1867-8548
Publisher:
Copernicus Publications, EGU
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
17 WIND ENERGY; eXperimental Planetary boundary layer Instrumentation Assessment; XPIA; wind flow fields; flow modeling

Citation Formats

Choukulkar, Aditya, Brewer, W. Alan, Sandberg, Scott P., Weickmann, Ann, Bonin, Timothy A., Hardesty, R. Michael, Lundquist, Julie K., Delgado, Ruben, Iungo, G. Valerio, Ashton, Ryan, Debnath, Mithu, Bianco, Laura, Wilczak, James M., Oncley, Steven, and Wolfe, Daniel. Evaluation of single and multiple Doppler lidar techniques to measure complex flow during the XPIA field campaign. Germany: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.5194/amt-10-247-2017.
Choukulkar, Aditya, Brewer, W. Alan, Sandberg, Scott P., Weickmann, Ann, Bonin, Timothy A., Hardesty, R. Michael, Lundquist, Julie K., Delgado, Ruben, Iungo, G. Valerio, Ashton, Ryan, Debnath, Mithu, Bianco, Laura, Wilczak, James M., Oncley, Steven, & Wolfe, Daniel. Evaluation of single and multiple Doppler lidar techniques to measure complex flow during the XPIA field campaign. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-247-2017
Choukulkar, Aditya, Brewer, W. Alan, Sandberg, Scott P., Weickmann, Ann, Bonin, Timothy A., Hardesty, R. Michael, Lundquist, Julie K., Delgado, Ruben, Iungo, G. Valerio, Ashton, Ryan, Debnath, Mithu, Bianco, Laura, Wilczak, James M., Oncley, Steven, and Wolfe, Daniel. Mon . "Evaluation of single and multiple Doppler lidar techniques to measure complex flow during the XPIA field campaign". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-247-2017.
@article{osti_1341344,
title = {Evaluation of single and multiple Doppler lidar techniques to measure complex flow during the XPIA field campaign},
author = {Choukulkar, Aditya and Brewer, W. Alan and Sandberg, Scott P. and Weickmann, Ann and Bonin, Timothy A. and Hardesty, R. Michael and Lundquist, Julie K. and Delgado, Ruben and Iungo, G. Valerio and Ashton, Ryan and Debnath, Mithu and Bianco, Laura and Wilczak, James M. and Oncley, Steven and Wolfe, Daniel},
abstractNote = {Accurate three-dimensional information of wind flow fields can be an important tool in not only visualizing complex flow but also understanding the underlying physical processes and improving flow modeling. However, a thorough analysis of the measurement uncertainties is required to properly interpret results. The XPIA (eXperimental Planetary boundary layer Instrumentation Assessment) field campaign conducted at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) in Erie, CO, from 2 March to 31 May 2015 brought together a large suite of in situ and remote sensing measurement platforms to evaluate complex flow measurement strategies. In this paper, measurement uncertainties for different single and multi-Doppler strategies using simple scan geometries (conical, vertical plane and staring) are investigated. The tradeoffs (such as time–space resolution vs. spatial coverage) among the different measurement techniques are evaluated using co-located measurements made near the BAO tower. Sensitivity of the single-/multi-Doppler measurement uncertainties to averaging period are investigated using the sonic anemometers installed on the BAO tower as the standard reference. Finally, the radiometer measurements are used to partition the measurement periods as a function of atmospheric stability to determine their effect on measurement uncertainty. It was found that with an increase in spatial coverage and measurement complexity, the uncertainty in the wind measurement also increased. For multi-Doppler techniques, the increase in uncertainty for temporally uncoordinated measurements is possibly due to requiring additional assumptions of stationarity along with horizontal homogeneity and less representative line-of-sight velocity statistics. Lastly, it was also found that wind speed measurement uncertainty was lower during stable conditions compared to unstable conditions.},
doi = {10.5194/amt-10-247-2017},
journal = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Online)},
number = 1,
volume = 10,
place = {Germany},
year = {Mon Jan 23 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Mon Jan 23 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-247-2017

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 22 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

3D Volumetric Analysis of Wind Turbine Wake Properties in the Atmosphere Using High-Resolution Doppler Lidar
journal, May 2015

  • Banta, Robert M.; Pichugina, Yelena L.; Brewer, W. Alan
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00078.1

Long-Range WindScanner System
journal, October 2016

  • Vasiljević, Nikola; Lea, Guillaume; Courtney, Michael
  • Remote Sensing, Vol. 8, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/rs8110896

Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain [Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain]
journal, May 2009


Validation of Dual-Doppler Wind Profiles with in situ Anemometry
journal, May 2015

  • Gunter, W. Scott; Schroeder, John L.; Hirth, Brian D.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00181.1

Triple Doppler wind lidar observations during the mountain terrain atmospheric modeling and observations field campaign
journal, April 2016

  • Wang, Yansen; Hocut, Christopher M.; Hoch, Sebastian W.
  • Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.10.026015

Three-Dimensional Wind Retrieval: Application of MUSCAT to Dual-Doppler Lidar
journal, March 2009

  • Drechsel, Susanne; Mayr, Georg J.; Chong, Michel
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA1115.1

Coherent Doppler lidar for wind farm characterization: Coherent Doppler lidar for wind farm characterization
journal, January 2012

  • Krishnamurthy, R.; Choukulkar, A.; Calhoun, R.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 16, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.539

Coplanar Doppler Lidar Retrieval of Rotors from T-REX
journal, March 2010

  • Hill, Michael; Calhoun, Ron; Fernando, H. J. S.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 67, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JAS3016.1

Wake Measurements of a Multi-MW Wind Turbine with Coherent Long-Range Pulsed Doppler Wind Lidar
journal, September 2010

  • Käsler, Yvonne; Rahm, Stephan; Simmet, Rudolf
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 27, Issue 9, p. 1529-1532
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JTECHA1483.1

Wind Measurements from Arc Scans with Doppler Wind Lidar
journal, November 2015

  • Wang, H.; Barthelmie, R. J.; Clifton, A.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00059.1

LABLE: A Multi-Institutional, Student-Led, Atmospheric Boundary Layer Experiment
journal, October 2015

  • Klein, P.; Bonin, T. A.; Newman, J. F.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00267.1

Addressing Spatial Variability of Surface-Layer Wind with Long-Range WindScanners
journal, March 2015

  • Berg, Jacob; Vasiljevíc, Nikola; Kelly, Mark
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00123.1

Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data
journal, October 2000


3D Turbulence Measurements Using Three Synchronous Wind Lidars: Validation against Sonic Anemometry
journal, July 2014

  • Fuertes, Fernando Carbajo; Iungo, Giacomo Valerio; Porté-Agel, Fernando
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 31, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00206.1

Dual-Doppler Lidar Measurements for Improving Dispersion Models
journal, June 2005

  • Collier, Chris G.; Davies, Fay; Bozier, Karen E.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 86, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-86-6-825

Virtual Towers Using Coherent Doppler Lidar during the Joint Urban 2003 Dispersion Experiment
journal, August 2006

  • Calhoun, R.; Heap, R.; Princevac, M.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 45, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAM2391.1

Scopes and Challenges of Dual-Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements—An Error Analysis
journal, September 2013

  • Stawiarski, Christina; Träumner, Katja; Knigge, Christoph
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 30, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00244.1

On the Analysis of Single-Doppler Radar Data
journal, April 1979


A Modified Optimal Interpolation Technique for Vector Retrieval for Coherent Doppler LIDAR
journal, November 2012

  • Choukulkar, Aditya; Calhoun, Ronald; Billings, Brian
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 9, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2191762

Windscanner: 3-D wind and turbulence measurements from three steerable doppler lidars
journal, May 2008


Characterization of wind velocities in the upstream induction zone of a wind turbine using scanning continuous-wave lidars
journal, January 2016

  • Simley, Eric; Angelou, Nikolas; Mikkelsen, Torben
  • Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4940025

Boundary layer dynamics over London, UK, as observed using Doppler lidar during REPARTEE-II
journal, January 2011

  • Barlow, J. F.; Dunbar, T. M.; Nemitz, E. G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-2111-2011

Linearly Organized Turbulence Structures Observed Over a Suburban Area by Dual-Doppler Lidar
journal, December 2007


The MATERHORN: Unraveling the Intricacies of Mountain Weather
journal, November 2015

  • Fernando, H. J. S.; Pardyjak, E. R.; Di Sabatino, S.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00131.1

Turbine-scale wind field measurements using dual-Doppler lidar: Turbine-scale wind field measurements using dual-Doppler lidar
journal, December 2013

  • Newsom, Rob K.; Berg, Larry K.; Shaw, William J.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.1691

Assessing State-of-the-Art Capabilities for Probing the Atmospheric Boundary Layer: The XPIA Field Campaign
journal, February 2017

  • Lundquist, Julie K.; Wilczak, James M.; Ashton, Ryan
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 98, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00151.1

Quantifying error of lidar and sodar Doppler beam swinging measurements of wind turbine wakes using computational fluid dynamics
journal, January 2015

  • Lundquist, J. K.; Churchfield, M. J.; Lee, S.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-907-2015

Instrument configuration for dual-Doppler lidar coplanar scans: METCRAX II
journal, January 2015

  • Cherukuru, Nihanth Wagmi; Calhoun, Ronald; Lehner, Manuela
  • Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.9.096090

First comparison of LES of an offshore wind turbine wake with dual-Doppler lidar measurements in a German offshore wind farm
journal, June 2015


The Determination of Kinematic Properties of a Wind Field Using Doppler Radar
journal, February 1968


Turbulent Structures and Coherence in the Atmospheric Surface Layer
journal, September 2014