Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado
Abstract
We develop a state-level computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that reflects the roles of coal, natural gas, wind, solar, and hydroelectricity in supplying electricity, using Colorado as a case study. Also, we focus on the economic impact of implementing Colorado's existing Renewable Portfolio Standard, updated in 2013. This requires that 25% of state generation come from qualifying renewable sources by 2020. We evaluate the policy under a variety of assumptions regarding wind integration costs and assumptions on the persistence of federal subsidies for wind. Specifically, we estimate the implied price of carbon as the carbon price at which a state-level policy would pass a state-level cost-benefit analysis, taking account of estimated greenhouse gas emission reductions and ancillary benefits from corresponding reductions in criteria pollutants. Our findings suggest that without the Production Tax Credit (federal aid), the state policy of mandating renewable power generation (RPS) is costly to state actors, with an implied cost of carbon of about $17 per ton of CO2 with a 3% discount rate. Federal aid makes the decision between natural gas and wind nearly cost neutral for Colorado.
- Authors:
-
- Istanbul Technical Univ. (Turkey)
- Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO (United States)
- National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis (JISEA) Innovative Research Analysis Award Program (IRAAP); USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1342825
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1396871
- Report Number(s):
- NREL/JA-6A20-67657
Journal ID: ISSN 0301-4215
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC36-08GO28308
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Energy Policy
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 102; Journal ID: ISSN 0301-4215
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; renewable portfolio standard; computable general equilibrium
Citation Formats
Hannum, Christopher, Cutler, Harvey, Iverson, Terrence, and Keyser, David. Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.046.
Hannum, Christopher, Cutler, Harvey, Iverson, Terrence, & Keyser, David. Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.046
Hannum, Christopher, Cutler, Harvey, Iverson, Terrence, and Keyser, David. Sat .
"Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.046. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1342825.
@article{osti_1342825,
title = {Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado},
author = {Hannum, Christopher and Cutler, Harvey and Iverson, Terrence and Keyser, David},
abstractNote = {We develop a state-level computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that reflects the roles of coal, natural gas, wind, solar, and hydroelectricity in supplying electricity, using Colorado as a case study. Also, we focus on the economic impact of implementing Colorado's existing Renewable Portfolio Standard, updated in 2013. This requires that 25% of state generation come from qualifying renewable sources by 2020. We evaluate the policy under a variety of assumptions regarding wind integration costs and assumptions on the persistence of federal subsidies for wind. Specifically, we estimate the implied price of carbon as the carbon price at which a state-level policy would pass a state-level cost-benefit analysis, taking account of estimated greenhouse gas emission reductions and ancillary benefits from corresponding reductions in criteria pollutants. Our findings suggest that without the Production Tax Credit (federal aid), the state policy of mandating renewable power generation (RPS) is costly to state actors, with an implied cost of carbon of about $17 per ton of CO2 with a 3% discount rate. Federal aid makes the decision between natural gas and wind nearly cost neutral for Colorado.},
doi = {10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.046},
journal = {Energy Policy},
number = ,
volume = 102,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Jan 07 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Sat Jan 07 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
The hidden winners of renewable energy promotion: Insights into sector-specific wage differentials
journal, November 2015
- Antoni, Manfred; Janser, Markus; Lehmer, Florian
- Energy Policy, Vol. 86
A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une theorie de la demande de produits differencies d'apres leur origine) (Una teoria de la demanda de productos distinguiendolos segun el lugar de produccion)
journal, March 1969
- Armington, Paul S.
- Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund, Vol. 16, Issue 1
Managing carbon regulatory risk in utility resource planning: Current practices in the Western United States
journal, September 2008
- Barbose, Galen; Wiser, Ryan; Phadke, Amol
- Energy Policy, Vol. 36, Issue 9
Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector
journal, May 2003
- Burtraw, Dallas; Krupnick, Alan; Palmer, Karen
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 45, Issue 3
Local Solutions to Global Problems: Climate Change Policies and Regulatory Jurisdiction
journal, July 2008
- Bushnell, James; Peterman, Carla; Wolfram, Catherine
- Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 2, Issue 2
Weighing the costs and benefits of state renewables portfolio standards in the United States: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections
journal, April 2009
- Chen, Cliff; Wiser, Ryan; Mills, Andrew
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 3
Going Full Circle: Demandside Constraints to the Green Paradox
book, September 2014
- Maria, Corrado Di; Lange, Ian; van der Werf, Edwin
- Climate Policy and Nonrenewable Resources
Interactions between State and Federal Climate Change Policies
report, June 2010
- Goulder, Lawrence; Stavins, Robert
The impact of intermittently renewable energy on Italian wholesale electricity prices: Additional benefits or additional costs?
journal, August 2015
- Gullì, Francesco; Balbo, Antonio Lo
- Energy Policy, Vol. 83
The expansion of renewable energies and employment effects in Germany
journal, December 2006
- Hillebrand, Bernhard; Buttermann, Hans Georg; Behringer, Jean Marc
- Energy Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 18
A CGE analysis for quantitative evaluation of electricity market changes
journal, August 2015
- Hwang, Won-Sik; Lee, Jeong-Dong
- Energy Policy, Vol. 83
Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies
journal, May 2011
- Joskow, Paul L.
- American Economic Review, Vol. 101, Issue 3
Impacts of a renewable portfolio generation standard on US energy markets
journal, February 2007
- Kydes, Andy S.
- Energy Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 2
Green jobs? Economic impacts of renewable energy in Germany
journal, August 2012
- Lehr, Ulrike; Lutz, Christian; Edler, Dietmar
- Energy Policy, Vol. 47
Developing a Social Cost of Carbon for US Regulatory Analysis: A Methodology and Interpretation
journal, January 2013
- Greenstone, M.; Kopits, E.; Wolverton, A.
- Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 7, Issue 1
Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy
journal, August 2011
- Muller, Nicholas Z.; Mendelsohn, Robert; Nordhaus, William
- American Economic Review, Vol. 101, Issue 5
Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States
journal, July 2007
- Muller, Nicholas Z.; Mendelsohn, Robert
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 54, Issue 1
A Polycentric Approach For Coping With Climate Change
book, October 2009
- Ostrom, Elinor
- Policy Research Working Papers
Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies
journal, November 2005
- Palmer, Karen; Burtraw, Dallas
- Energy Economics, Vol. 27, Issue 6
Building Small City and Town Sams and CGE Models
journal, July 2003
- Schwarm, Walter; Cutler, Harvey
- Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Vol. 15, Issue 2
Rethinking Environmental Federalism in a Warming World
journal, November 2012
- Shobe, William M.; Burtraw, Dallas
- Climate Change Economics, Vol. 03, Issue 04
Econometric Estimation of Armington Import Elasticities for a Regional cge Model of the Illinois Economy
journal, March 2012
- Turner, Karen; Ha, Soo Jung; Hewings, Geoffrey J. D.
- Economic Systems Research, Vol. 24, Issue 1
Energy, economic and environmental discourses and their policy impact: The case of Ontario׳s Green Energy and Green Economy Act
journal, May 2014
- Winfield, Mark; Dolter, Brett
- Energy Policy, Vol. 68
Works referencing / citing this record:
Who pays for water scarcity? Evaluating the welfare implications of water infrastructure investments for cities
journal, September 2019
- Zhong, Hua; Taylor, Michael H.; Rollins, Kimberly S.
- The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 63, Issue 3
Health co-benefits of sub-national renewable energy policy in the US
journal, August 2019
- Dimanchev, Emil G.; Paltsev, Sergey; Yuan, Mei
- Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 8