skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cellulosic feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land: Potential yields and environmental effects

Abstract

Producing biofuel feedstocks on current agricultural land raises questions of a ‘food-vs.-fuel’ trade-off. The use of current or former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land offers an alternative; yet the volumes of ethanol that could be produced and the potential environmental impacts of such a policy are unclear. Here, we applied the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate model to a US Department of Agriculture database of over 200 000 CRP polygons in Iowa, USA, as a case study. We simulated yields and environmental impacts of growing three cellulosic biofuel feedstocks on CRP land: (i) an Alamo-variety switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.); (ii) a generalized mixture of C4 and C3 grasses; (iii) and no-till corn ( Zea mays L.) with residue removal. We simulated yields, soil erosion, and soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks and fluxes. We found that although no-till corn with residue removal produced approximately 2.6–4.4 times more ethanol per area compared to switchgrass and the grass mixture, it also led to 3.9–4.5 times more erosion, 4.4–5.2 times more cumulative N loss, and a 10% reduction in total soil carbon as opposed to a 6–11% increase. Switchgrass resulted in the best environmental outcomes even when expressed on a per litermore » ethanol basis. Our results suggest planting no-till corn with residue removal should only be done on low slope soils to minimize environmental concerns. Altogether, this analysis provides additional information to policy makers on the potential outcome and effects of producing biofuel feedstocks on current or former conservation lands.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3]
  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. (United States)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), College Park, MD (United States); Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)
  3. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States); Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States); Texas A & M Univ., Temple, TX (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Wisconsin System, Madison, WI (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (SC-23); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1341329
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1341330; OSTI ID: 1361520
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC02-07ER64494; KP1601050; DOE EERE OBP 20469-19145
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 9; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; biofuel; biomass; carbon; Conservation Reserve Program; erosion; nitrogen; no-till corn; residue removal; switchgrass

Citation Formats

LeDuc, Stephen D., Zhang, Xuesong, Clark, Christopher M., and Izaurralde, R. Cesar. Cellulosic feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land: Potential yields and environmental effects. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12352.
LeDuc, Stephen D., Zhang, Xuesong, Clark, Christopher M., & Izaurralde, R. Cesar. Cellulosic feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land: Potential yields and environmental effects. United States. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12352.
LeDuc, Stephen D., Zhang, Xuesong, Clark, Christopher M., and Izaurralde, R. Cesar. Fri . "Cellulosic feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land: Potential yields and environmental effects". United States. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12352.
@article{osti_1341329,
title = {Cellulosic feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land: Potential yields and environmental effects},
author = {LeDuc, Stephen D. and Zhang, Xuesong and Clark, Christopher M. and Izaurralde, R. Cesar},
abstractNote = {Producing biofuel feedstocks on current agricultural land raises questions of a ‘food-vs.-fuel’ trade-off. The use of current or former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land offers an alternative; yet the volumes of ethanol that could be produced and the potential environmental impacts of such a policy are unclear. Here, we applied the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate model to a US Department of Agriculture database of over 200 000 CRP polygons in Iowa, USA, as a case study. We simulated yields and environmental impacts of growing three cellulosic biofuel feedstocks on CRP land: (i) an Alamo-variety switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.); (ii) a generalized mixture of C4 and C3 grasses; (iii) and no-till corn (Zea mays L.) with residue removal. We simulated yields, soil erosion, and soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks and fluxes. We found that although no-till corn with residue removal produced approximately 2.6–4.4 times more ethanol per area compared to switchgrass and the grass mixture, it also led to 3.9–4.5 times more erosion, 4.4–5.2 times more cumulative N loss, and a 10% reduction in total soil carbon as opposed to a 6–11% increase. Switchgrass resulted in the best environmental outcomes even when expressed on a per liter ethanol basis. Our results suggest planting no-till corn with residue removal should only be done on low slope soils to minimize environmental concerns. Altogether, this analysis provides additional information to policy makers on the potential outcome and effects of producing biofuel feedstocks on current or former conservation lands.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.12352},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = 2,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12352

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 5 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share: