“Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway Towards Process and Material Qualification”

Carpenter, John S.; Beese, Allison M.; Bourell, David L.; Hamilton, Reginald F.; Herderick, Edward; Mishra, Rajiv S.; Sears, James

doi:10.1007/s11661-016-3577-5

Title: “Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway Towards Process and Material Qualification”

Full Record
Other Related Research

Abstract

The potential benefits of metal additive manufacturing, as compared with more traditional, subtractive-only approaches, has created excitement within design circles seeking to take advantage of the ability to build and repair complex shapes, to integrate or consolidate multiple parts and minimize joining concerns, and to locally tailor material properties to increase functionality. Tempering the excitement of designers, however, has been concerns with the material deposited by the process. It is not enough for a part to ‘look’ right from a geometric perspective. Rather, the metallurgical aspects associated with the material being deposited must ‘look’ and ‘behave’ correctly along with the aforementioned geometric accuracy. Finally, without elucidation of the connections between processing, microstructure, properties, and performance from a materials science perspective, metal additive manufacturing will not realize its potential to change the manufacturing world for property and performance-critical engineering applications.

Authors:

Carpenter, John S. ^[1]; Beese, Allison M. ^[2]; Bourell, David L. ^[3]; Hamilton, Reginald F. ^[2]; Herderick, Edward ^[4]; Mishra, Rajiv S. ^[5]; Sears, James ^[6]

Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)
Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)
General Electric, Cincinnati, OH (United States)
Univ. of North Texas, Denton, TX (United States)
General Electric, Niskayuna, NY (United States)

Publication Date:: Tue Jun 14 00:00:00 EDT 2016

Research Org.:: Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

OSTI Identifier:: 1340926

Report Number(s):: LA-UR-16-22717
Journal ID: ISSN 1073-5623

Grant/Contract Number:: AC52-06NA25396

Resource Type:: Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Volume: 47; Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 1073-5623

Publisher:: ASM International

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; 42 ENGINEERING

Citation Formats


                    Carpenter, John S., Beese, Allison M., Bourell, David L., Hamilton, Reginald F., Herderick, Edward, Mishra, Rajiv S., and Sears, James. “Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway Towards Process and Material Qualification”.  United States: N. p., 2016. 
Web.  doi:10.1007/s11661-016-3577-5.

Copy to clipboard


                    Carpenter, John S., Beese, Allison M., Bourell, David L., Hamilton, Reginald F., Herderick, Edward, Mishra, Rajiv S., & Sears, James. “Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway Towards Process and Material Qualification”.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3577-5

Copy to clipboard


                    Carpenter, John S., Beese, Allison M., Bourell, David L., Hamilton, Reginald F., Herderick, Edward, Mishra, Rajiv S., and Sears, James. Tue .  
"“Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway Towards Process and Material Qualification”".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3577-5.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1340926.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1340926,

  title        = {“Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway Towards Process and Material Qualification”},

  author       = {Carpenter, John S. and Beese, Allison M. and Bourell, David L. and Hamilton, Reginald F. and Herderick, Edward and Mishra, Rajiv S. and Sears, James},

  abstractNote = {The potential benefits of metal additive manufacturing, as compared with more traditional, subtractive-only approaches, has created excitement within design circles seeking to take advantage of the ability to build and repair complex shapes, to integrate or consolidate multiple parts and minimize joining concerns, and to locally tailor material properties to increase functionality. Tempering the excitement of designers, however, has been concerns with the material deposited by the process. It is not enough for a part to ‘look’ right from a geometric perspective. Rather, the metallurgical aspects associated with the material being deposited must ‘look’ and ‘behave’ correctly along with the aforementioned geometric accuracy. Finally, without elucidation of the connections between processing, microstructure, properties, and performance from a materials science perspective, metal additive manufacturing will not realize its potential to change the manufacturing world for property and performance-critical engineering applications.},

  doi          = {10.1007/s11661-016-3577-5},

  journal      = {Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science},

  number       = 8,

  volume       = 47,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Tue Jun 14 00:00:00 EDT 2016},

  month        = {Tue Jun 14 00:00:00 EDT 2016}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Publisher's Version of Record

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3577-5

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Beryllium Manufacturing Processes

Technical Report Goldberg, A

This report is one of a number of reports that will be combined into a handbook on beryllium. Each report covers a specific topic. To-date, the following reports have been published: (1) Consolidation and Grades of Beryllium; (2) Mechanical Properties of Beryllium and the Factors Affecting these Properties; (3) Corrosion and Corrosion Protection of Beryllium; (4) Joining of Beryllium; (5) Atomic, Crystal, Elastic, Thermal, Nuclear, and other Properties of Beryllium; and (6) Beryllium Coating (Deposition) Processes and the Influence of Processing Parameters on Properties and Microstructure. The conventional method of using ingot-cast material is unsuitable for manufacturing a beryllium product.more »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/897931

Full Text Available
Surface Qualification Toolpath Optimization for Hybrid Manufacturing

Journal Article Thien, Austen ; Saldana, Christopher ; Kurfess, Thomas - Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing

Hybrid manufacturing machine tools have great potential to revolutionize manufacturing by combining both additive manufacturing (AM) and subtractive manufacturing (SM) processes on the same machine tool. A prominent issue that can occur when going from AM to SM is that the SM process toolpath does not account for geometric discrepancies caused by the previous AM step, which leads to increased production times and tool wear, particularly when wire-based directed energy deposition (DED) is used as the AM process. This work discusses a methodology for approximating a part’s surface topology using on-machine contact probing and formulating an optimized SM toolpath usingmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp5030094
Additive Manufacturing at LANL: Advanced Characterization to Explore the Science of a New Manufacturing Method

Journal Article Carpenter, John S. ; Brown, Donald William ; Clausen, Bjorn ; ... - Stockpile Stewardship Quarterly

Additive manufacturing (AM), or three-dimensional (3D) printing as it is more commonly known, is defined as the process of joining materials and creating objects by melting, sintering, or fusing material in a layer-by-layer fashion coordinated via 3D model data.1 Subtractive, or traditional, manufacturing methodologies often consist of machining/removing material—like a sculptor—or forming material through the application of pressure—like a potter. Conversely, in an AM process, material is added in individual volume elements and built up in a way similar to interlocking building blocks, but with volume elements that are typically the size of a grain of sand. The additive processmore »« less
Full Text Available
An In-depth Review On the Scientific and Policy Issues Associated with Additive Manufacturing

Journal Article Love, Lonnie J. ; Nycz, Andrzej ; Adediran, Adeola I. - Journal of Science Policy & Governance

Historically, manufacturing processes have been predominantly subtractive, i.e. three-dimensional objects were created by successively cutting material away from a solid block, by scraping, machining, turning or dissolving. Additive manufacturing (AM) or three-dimensional (3D) printing, in contrast, is controlled material addition, implemented by successively depositing layers of material until a predesigned shape is formed. AM represents an innovative manufacturing technology, and is set to transform production processes from design to manufacture, and to eventual distribution to end users, ultimately leading to an increase in energy efficiency and a reduction in gas emissions for future generation of industries. The unique capability ofmore »« less
Full Text Available
Foreword: Additive Manufacturing: Interrelationships of Fabrication, Constitutive Relationships Targeting Performance, and Feedback to Process Control

Journal Article Carpenter, John S. ; Beese, Allison M. ; Bourell, David L. ; ... - Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers distinct advantages over conventional manufacturing processes including the capability to both build and repair complex part shapes; to integrate and consolidate parts and thus overcome joining concerns; and to locally tailor material compositions as well as properties. Moreover, a variety of fields such as aerospace, military, automotive, and biomedical are employing this manufacturing technique as a way to decrease costs, increase manufacturing agility, and explore novel geometry/functionalities. In order to increase acceptance of AM as a viable processing method, pathways for qualifying both the material and the process need to be developed and, perhaps, standardized. Thismore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-3015-0

Full Text Available

Similar Records