DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Push-pull tracer tests: Their information content and use for characterizing non-Fickian, mobile-immobile behavior: INFORMATION CONTENT OF PUSH-PULL TESTS

Abstract

Path reversibility and radial symmetry are often assumed in push-pull tracer test analysis. In reality, heterogeneous flow fields mean that both assumptions are idealizations. In this paper, to understand their impact, we perform a parametric study which quantifies the scattering effects of ambient flow, local-scale dispersion, and velocity field heterogeneity on push-pull breakthrough curves and compares them to the effects of mobile-immobile mass transfer (MIMT) processes including sorption and diffusion into secondary porosity. We identify specific circumstances in which MIMT overwhelmingly determines the breakthrough curve, which may then be considered uninformative about drift and local-scale dispersion. Assuming path reversibility, we develop a continuous-time-random-walk-based interpretation framework which is flow-field-agnostic and well suited to quantifying MIMT. Adopting this perspective, we show that the radial flow assumption is often harmless: to the extent that solute paths are reversible, the breakthrough curve is uninformative about velocity field heterogeneity. Our interpretation method determines a mapping function (i.e., subordinator) from travel time in the absence of MIMT to travel time in its presence. A mathematical theory allowing this function to be directly “plugged into” an existing Laplace-domain transport model to incorporate MIMT is presented and demonstrated. Algorithms implementing the calibration are presented and applied to interpretationmore » of data from a push-pull test performed in a heterogeneous environment. A successful four-parameter fit is obtained, of comparable fidelity to one obtained using a million-node 3-D numerical model. In conclusion, we demonstrate analytically and numerically how push-pull tests quantifying MIMT are sensitive to remobilization, but not immobilization, kinetics.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [3];  [3]
  1. Computational Earth Sciences Group (EES-16), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos New Mexico USA; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot Israel
  2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot Israel
  3. Computational Earth Sciences Group (EES-16), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos New Mexico USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1338755
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-16-20526
Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1397
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396; 11145687
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Water Resources Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 52; Journal Issue: 12; Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1397
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; Mathematics; Planetary Sciences

Citation Formats

Hansen, Scott K., Berkowitz, Brian, Vesselinov, Velimir V., O'Malley, Daniel, and Karra, Satish. Push-pull tracer tests: Their information content and use for characterizing non-Fickian, mobile-immobile behavior: INFORMATION CONTENT OF PUSH-PULL TESTS. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/2016WR018769.
Hansen, Scott K., Berkowitz, Brian, Vesselinov, Velimir V., O'Malley, Daniel, & Karra, Satish. Push-pull tracer tests: Their information content and use for characterizing non-Fickian, mobile-immobile behavior: INFORMATION CONTENT OF PUSH-PULL TESTS. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018769
Hansen, Scott K., Berkowitz, Brian, Vesselinov, Velimir V., O'Malley, Daniel, and Karra, Satish. Thu . "Push-pull tracer tests: Their information content and use for characterizing non-Fickian, mobile-immobile behavior: INFORMATION CONTENT OF PUSH-PULL TESTS". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018769. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1338755.
@article{osti_1338755,
title = {Push-pull tracer tests: Their information content and use for characterizing non-Fickian, mobile-immobile behavior: INFORMATION CONTENT OF PUSH-PULL TESTS},
author = {Hansen, Scott K. and Berkowitz, Brian and Vesselinov, Velimir V. and O'Malley, Daniel and Karra, Satish},
abstractNote = {Path reversibility and radial symmetry are often assumed in push-pull tracer test analysis. In reality, heterogeneous flow fields mean that both assumptions are idealizations. In this paper, to understand their impact, we perform a parametric study which quantifies the scattering effects of ambient flow, local-scale dispersion, and velocity field heterogeneity on push-pull breakthrough curves and compares them to the effects of mobile-immobile mass transfer (MIMT) processes including sorption and diffusion into secondary porosity. We identify specific circumstances in which MIMT overwhelmingly determines the breakthrough curve, which may then be considered uninformative about drift and local-scale dispersion. Assuming path reversibility, we develop a continuous-time-random-walk-based interpretation framework which is flow-field-agnostic and well suited to quantifying MIMT. Adopting this perspective, we show that the radial flow assumption is often harmless: to the extent that solute paths are reversible, the breakthrough curve is uninformative about velocity field heterogeneity. Our interpretation method determines a mapping function (i.e., subordinator) from travel time in the absence of MIMT to travel time in its presence. A mathematical theory allowing this function to be directly “plugged into” an existing Laplace-domain transport model to incorporate MIMT is presented and demonstrated. Algorithms implementing the calibration are presented and applied to interpretation of data from a push-pull test performed in a heterogeneous environment. A successful four-parameter fit is obtained, of comparable fidelity to one obtained using a million-node 3-D numerical model. In conclusion, we demonstrate analytically and numerically how push-pull tests quantifying MIMT are sensitive to remobilization, but not immobilization, kinetics.},
doi = {10.1002/2016WR018769},
journal = {Water Resources Research},
number = 12,
volume = 52,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 15 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Understanding the effect of single-fracture heterogeneity from single-well injection-withdrawal (SWIW) tests
journal, May 2013


Ambiguity in Measuring Matrix Diffusion with Single-Well Injection/Recovery Tracer Tests
journal, January 1997


Simplified Method of "Push-Pull" Test Data Analysis for Determining In Situ Reaction Rate Coefficients
journal, March 1998


Study of alternative tracer tests in characterizing transport in fractured rocks
journal, June 1995

  • Tsang, Y. W.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 22, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/95GL01093

A simple and efficient random walk solution of multi-rate mobile/immobile mass transport equations
journal, April 2009


In situ evaluation of solute retardation using single-well push–pull tests
journal, October 2000


Impact of velocity correlation and distribution on transport in fractured media: Field evidence and theoretical model
journal, February 2015

  • Kang, Peter K.; Le Borgne, Tanguy; Dentz, Marco
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015799

Reaction chain modeling of denitrification reactions during a push–pull test
journal, May 2013


A note on in situ estimates of sorption using push-pull tests: TECHNICAL NOTE
journal, March 2005

  • Cassiani, Giorgio; Burbery, Lee F.; Giustiniani, Michela
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003382

Continuous time random walk and multirate mass transfer modeling of sorption
journal, November 2003


A Method to Infer In Situ Reaction Rates from Push-Pull Experiments
journal, July 1998


Macroscopic behavior and random-walk particle tracking of kinetically sorbing solutes
journal, August 2000

  • Michalak, Anna M.; Kitanidis, Peter K.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 36, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000WR900109

In situ assessment of microbial sulfate reduction in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer using push–pull tests and stable sulfur isotope analyses
journal, October 2001


Continuous time random walks for non-local radial solute transport
journal, August 2015


General Analysis of Longitudinal Dispersion in Nonuniform Flow
journal, December 1971


Non-Fickian dispersion in porous media explained by heterogeneous microscale matrix diffusion: NON-FICKIAN DISPERSION AND HETEROGENEOUS DIFFUSION
journal, November 2008

  • Gouze, Philippe; Melean, Yasmin; Le Borgne, Tanguy
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 44, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006690

Multiple-Rate Mass Transfer for Modeling Diffusion and Surface Reactions in Media with Pore-Scale Heterogeneity
journal, June 1995

  • Haggerty, Roy; Gorelick, Steven M.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/95WR10583

Spatial distributions of perchloroethylene reactive transport parameters in the Borden Aquifer: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PCE PARAMETERS
journal, January 2006

  • Allen-King, Richelle M.; Divine, Dana Packard; Robin, Michel J. L.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005WR003977

Interpretation and nonuniqueness of CTRW transition distributions: Insights from an alternative solute transport formulation
journal, December 2014


Models to Determine First-Order Rate Coefficients from Single-Well Push-Pull Tests
journal, March 2006


Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk
journal, January 2006

  • Berkowitz, Brian; Cortis, Andrea; Dentz, Marco
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 44, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005RG000178

Modeling mass transfer processes using random walk particle tracking: MODELING MASS TRANSFER USING PARTICLE TRACKING
journal, November 2006

  • Salamon, P.; Fernàndez-Garcia, D.; Gómez-Hernández, J. J.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006WR004927

Longitudinal dispersivity data and implications for scaling behavior
journal, May 2005


Anomalous transport in activated carbon porous samples: power-law trapping-time distributions
journal, August 2000

  • Drazer, G.; Rosen, M.; Zanette, D. H.
  • Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 283, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00149-7

Analytical solutions for efficient interpretation of single-well push-pull tracer tests: ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR PUSH-PULL TRACER TESTS
journal, August 2010

  • Huang, Junqi; Christ, John A.; Goltz, Mark N.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 46, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007647

Tracer tests in a fractured dolomite: 2. Analysis of mass transfer in single-well injection-withdrawal tests
journal, May 2001

  • Haggerty, Roy; Fleming, Sean W.; Meigs, Lucy C.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 37, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000WR900334

A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 1. Approach and overview of plume movement
journal, December 1986

  • Mackay, D. M.; Freyberg, D. L.; Roberts, P. V.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1029/WR022i013p02017

Three Big Cs
journal, September 2002


Works referencing / citing this record:

Models of Single‐Well Push‐Pull Test With Mixing Effect in the Wellbore
journal, December 2018

  • Wang, Quanrong; Shi, Wenguang; Zhan, Hongbin
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 54, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018wr023317

Biased Estimation of Groundwater Velocity from a Push-Pull Tracer Test Due to Plume Density and Pumping Rate
journal, July 2019

  • Kim, Hong-Hyun; Koh, Eun-Hee; Lee, Seong-Sun
  • Water, Vol. 11, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3390/w11081558