skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs

Last month, we considered four potential designs of varying sizes and a variety of their attributes for an engineering problem involving a screening design with seven factors. The engineer’s original request was to find a design with 14 runs that could estimate all of the main effects, as well as have some potential for finding important two-factor interactions and possibly curvature in the underlying surface. This assessment was that the proposed size of design was potentially a bit too ambitious for the experiment’s goals, so we explored three other competing designs that had slightly larger sizes but were able to improve several aspects of the design.
Authors:
 [1] ;  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-16-26819
Journal ID: ISSN 0033-524X
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Quality Progress
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 49; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 0033-524X
Publisher:
American Society for Quality Control
Research Org:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
USDOE
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; Mathematics
OSTI Identifier:
1337113

Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela, and Lu, Lu. Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs. United States: N. p., Web.
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela, & Lu, Lu. Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs. United States.
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela, and Lu, Lu. 2016. "Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1337113.
@article{osti_1337113,
title = {Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs},
author = {Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela and Lu, Lu},
abstractNote = {Last month, we considered four potential designs of varying sizes and a variety of their attributes for an engineering problem involving a screening design with seven factors. The engineer’s original request was to find a design with 14 runs that could estimate all of the main effects, as well as have some potential for finding important two-factor interactions and possibly curvature in the underlying surface. This assessment was that the proposed size of design was potentially a bit too ambitious for the experiment’s goals, so we explored three other competing designs that had slightly larger sizes but were able to improve several aspects of the design.},
doi = {},
journal = {Quality Progress},
number = 11,
volume = 49,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {11}
}