DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A path towards uncertainty assignment in an operational cloud-phase algorithm from ARM vertically pointing active sensors

Abstract

Knowledge of cloud phase (liquid, ice, mixed, etc.) is necessary to describe the radiative impact of clouds and their lifetimes, but is a property that is difficult to simulate correctly in climate models. One step towards improving those simulations is to make observations of cloud phase with sufficient accuracy to help constrain model representations of cloud processes. In our study, we outline a methodology using a basic Bayesian classifier to estimate the probabilities of cloud-phase class from Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) vertically pointing active remote sensors. The advantage of this method over previous ones is that it provides uncertainty information on the phase classification. We then test the value of including higher moments of the cloud radar Doppler spectrum than are traditionally used operationally. Using training data of known phase from the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) field campaign, we demonstrate a proof of concept for how the method can be used to train an algorithm that identifies ice, liquid, mixed phase, and snow. Over 95% of data are identified correctly for pure ice and liquid cases used in this study. Mixed-phase and snow cases are more problematic to identify correctly. Furthermore, when lidar data are not available, including additionalmore » information from the Doppler spectrum provides substantial improvement to the algorithm. This is a first step towards an operational algorithm and can be expanded to include additional categories such as drizzle with additional training data.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
OSTI Identifier:
1256528
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1324907; OSTI ID: 1336115
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-112801; BNL-112562-2016-JA
Journal ID: ISSN 2364-3587
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; SC00112704
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography (Online) Journal Volume: 2 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2364-3587
Publisher:
Copernicus Publications
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING

Citation Formats

Riihimaki, Laura D., Comstock, Jennifer M., Anderson, Kevin K., Holmes, Aimee, and Luke, Edward. A path towards uncertainty assignment in an operational cloud-phase algorithm from ARM vertically pointing active sensors. Germany: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.5194/ascmo-2-49-2016.
Riihimaki, Laura D., Comstock, Jennifer M., Anderson, Kevin K., Holmes, Aimee, & Luke, Edward. A path towards uncertainty assignment in an operational cloud-phase algorithm from ARM vertically pointing active sensors. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-49-2016
Riihimaki, Laura D., Comstock, Jennifer M., Anderson, Kevin K., Holmes, Aimee, and Luke, Edward. Fri . "A path towards uncertainty assignment in an operational cloud-phase algorithm from ARM vertically pointing active sensors". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-49-2016.
@article{osti_1256528,
title = {A path towards uncertainty assignment in an operational cloud-phase algorithm from ARM vertically pointing active sensors},
author = {Riihimaki, Laura D. and Comstock, Jennifer M. and Anderson, Kevin K. and Holmes, Aimee and Luke, Edward},
abstractNote = {Knowledge of cloud phase (liquid, ice, mixed, etc.) is necessary to describe the radiative impact of clouds and their lifetimes, but is a property that is difficult to simulate correctly in climate models. One step towards improving those simulations is to make observations of cloud phase with sufficient accuracy to help constrain model representations of cloud processes. In our study, we outline a methodology using a basic Bayesian classifier to estimate the probabilities of cloud-phase class from Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) vertically pointing active remote sensors. The advantage of this method over previous ones is that it provides uncertainty information on the phase classification. We then test the value of including higher moments of the cloud radar Doppler spectrum than are traditionally used operationally. Using training data of known phase from the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) field campaign, we demonstrate a proof of concept for how the method can be used to train an algorithm that identifies ice, liquid, mixed phase, and snow. Over 95% of data are identified correctly for pure ice and liquid cases used in this study. Mixed-phase and snow cases are more problematic to identify correctly. Furthermore, when lidar data are not available, including additional information from the Doppler spectrum provides substantial improvement to the algorithm. This is a first step towards an operational algorithm and can be expanded to include additional categories such as drizzle with additional training data.},
doi = {10.5194/ascmo-2-49-2016},
journal = {Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography (Online)},
number = 1,
volume = 2,
place = {Germany},
year = {Fri Jun 10 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Fri Jun 10 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-2-49-2016

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Characteristics of mixed-phase clouds. I: Lidar, radar and aircraft observations from CLARE'98
journal, July 2003

  • Hogan, R. J.; Francis, P. N.; Flentje, H.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 129, Issue 592
  • DOI: 10.1256/rj.01.208

Ice particles in stratiform clouds in the Arctic and possible mechanisms for the production of high ice concentrations
journal, July 2001

  • Rangno, Arthur L.; Hobbs, Peter V.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900286

The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Data: Algorithm Description
journal, June 2009

  • Young, Stuart A.; Vaughan, Mark A.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1

Mixed-phase cloud phase partitioning using millimeter wavelength cloud radar Doppler velocity spectra: MIXED-PHASE CLOUD PHASE PARTITIONING
journal, June 2014

  • Yu, G.; Verlinde, J.; Clothiaux, E. E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021182

Cloud Feedbacks in the Climate System: A Critical Review
journal, January 2005


High Spectral Resolution Lidar
book, January 2006


On the Representation of High-Latitude Boundary Layer Mixed-Phase Cloud in the ECMWF Global Model
journal, September 2014


Toward understanding of differences in current cloud retrievals of ARM ground-based measurements: UNDERSTANDING CLOUD RETRIEVAL DIFFERENCE
journal, May 2012

  • Zhao, Chuanfeng; Xie, Shaocheng; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016792

Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. II: Multilayer cloud
journal, April 2009

  • Morrison, Hugh; McCoy, Renata B.; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 641
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.415

Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud
journal, April 2009

  • Klein, Stephen A.; McCoy, Renata B.; Morrison, Hugh
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 641
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.416

A Focus On Mixed-Phase Clouds: The Status of Ground-Based Observational Methods
journal, October 2008

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Daniel, John S.; de Boer, Gijs
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 89, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008BAMS2378.1

Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO-GOCCP: CALIPSO-GOCCP CLOUD THERMODYNAMIC PHASE
journal, July 2013

  • Cesana, Grégory; Chepfer, Hélène
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50376

The Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment
journal, February 2007

  • Verlinde, J.; Harrington, J. Y.; McFarquhar, G. M.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-88-2-205

Studies of the radiative properties of ice and mixed-phase clouds
journal, January 1994

  • Sun, Zhian; Shine, Keith P.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 120, Issue 515
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712051508

A global view of midlevel liquid-layer topped stratiform cloud distribution and phase partition from CALIPSO and CloudSat measurements
journal, January 2010

  • Zhang, Damao; Wang, Zhien; Liu, Dong
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012143

Cloudnet: Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations
journal, June 2007

  • Illingworth, A. J.; Hogan, R. J.; O'Connor, E. J.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-88-6-883

Cloud water contents and hydrometeor sizes during the FIRE Arctic Clouds Experiment
journal, July 2001

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Uttal, Taneil; Matrosov, Sergey Y.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900476

Space observations of cold-cloud phase change
journal, June 2010

  • Choi, Y. -S.; Lindzen, R. S.; Ho, C. -H.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 25
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006241107

Arctic multilayered, mixed-phase cloud processes revealed in millimeter-wave cloud radar Doppler spectra: ARCTIC MULTILAYERED CLOUD PROCESSES
journal, December 2013

  • Verlinde, Johannes; Rambukkange, Mahlon P.; Clothiaux, Eugene E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020183

Ice properties of single-layer stratocumulus during the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 1. Observations
journal, January 2007

  • McFarquhar, Greg M.; Zhang, Gong; Poellot, Michael R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008633

A ground-based multisensor cloud phase classifier
journal, January 2007


Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models: CLOUD WATER PHASE IN GCMs
journal, March 2014

  • Komurcu, Muge; Storelvmo, Trude; Tan, Ivy
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021119

Algorithms for Projection–Pursuit robust principal component analysis
journal, June 2007


Estimate of the global distribution of stratiform supercooled liquid water clouds using the LITE lidar: SUPERCOOLED CLOUDS DETECTED BY LITE
journal, March 2004

  • Hogan, Robin J.; Behera, Mukunda D.; O'Connor, Ewan J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003GL018977

The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Cloud Profiling Radars: Second-Generation Sampling Strategies, Processing, and Cloud Data Products
journal, July 2007

  • Kollias, Pavlos; Miller, Mark A.; Luke, Edward P.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 24, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH2033.1

Detection of supercooled liquid in mixed-phase clouds using radar Doppler spectra
journal, January 2010

  • Luke, Edward P.; Kollias, Pavlos; Shupe, Matthew D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D19
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012884

Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties from AERI Lidar Observations: Algorithm and Results from SHEBA
journal, April 2005

  • Turner, D. D.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 44, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAM2208.1