DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Determination of errors in derived magnetic field directions in geosynchronous orbit: results from a statistical approach

Abstract

This study aims to statistically estimate the errors in local magnetic field directions that are derived from electron directional distributions measured by Los Alamos National Laboratory geosynchronous (LANL GEO) satellites. First, by comparing derived and measured magnetic field directions along the GEO orbit to those calculated from three selected empirical global magnetic field models (including a static Olson and Pfitzer 1977 quiet magnetic field model, a simple dynamic Tsyganenko 1989 model, and a sophisticated dynamic Tsyganenko 2001 storm model), it is shown that the errors in both derived and modeled directions are at least comparable. Second, using a newly developed proxy method as well as comparing results from empirical models, we are able to provide for the first time circumstantial evidence showing that derived magnetic field directions should statistically match the real magnetic directions better, with averaged errors< ~2°, than those from the three empirical models with averaged errors >~5°. In addition, our results suggest that the errors in derived magnetic field directions do not depend much on magnetospheric activity, in contrast to the empirical field models. Finally, as applications of the above conclusions, we show examples of electron pitch angle distributions observed by LANL GEO and also take themore » derived magnetic field directions as the real ones so as to test the performance of empirical field models along the GEO orbits, with results suggesting dependence on solar cycles as well as satellite locations. This study demonstrates the validity and value of the method that infers local magnetic field directions from particle spin-resolved distributions.« less

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1325839
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1334136
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-15-27475
Journal ID: ISSN 1432-0576
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Annales Geophysicae (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Annales Geophysicae (Online) Journal Volume: 34 Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 1432-0576
Publisher:
Copernicus Publications, EGU
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; magnetospheric physics; energetic particles trapped; storms and substorms; intruments and techniques

Citation Formats

Chen, Yue, Cunningham, Gregory, and Henderson, Michael. Determination of errors in derived magnetic field directions in geosynchronous orbit: results from a statistical approach. Germany: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.5194/angeo-34-831-2016.
Chen, Yue, Cunningham, Gregory, & Henderson, Michael. Determination of errors in derived magnetic field directions in geosynchronous orbit: results from a statistical approach. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-831-2016
Chen, Yue, Cunningham, Gregory, and Henderson, Michael. Wed . "Determination of errors in derived magnetic field directions in geosynchronous orbit: results from a statistical approach". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-831-2016.
@article{osti_1325839,
title = {Determination of errors in derived magnetic field directions in geosynchronous orbit: results from a statistical approach},
author = {Chen, Yue and Cunningham, Gregory and Henderson, Michael},
abstractNote = {This study aims to statistically estimate the errors in local magnetic field directions that are derived from electron directional distributions measured by Los Alamos National Laboratory geosynchronous (LANL GEO) satellites. First, by comparing derived and measured magnetic field directions along the GEO orbit to those calculated from three selected empirical global magnetic field models (including a static Olson and Pfitzer 1977 quiet magnetic field model, a simple dynamic Tsyganenko 1989 model, and a sophisticated dynamic Tsyganenko 2001 storm model), it is shown that the errors in both derived and modeled directions are at least comparable. Second, using a newly developed proxy method as well as comparing results from empirical models, we are able to provide for the first time circumstantial evidence showing that derived magnetic field directions should statistically match the real magnetic directions better, with averaged errors< ~2°, than those from the three empirical models with averaged errors >~5°. In addition, our results suggest that the errors in derived magnetic field directions do not depend much on magnetospheric activity, in contrast to the empirical field models. Finally, as applications of the above conclusions, we show examples of electron pitch angle distributions observed by LANL GEO and also take the derived magnetic field directions as the real ones so as to test the performance of empirical field models along the GEO orbits, with results suggesting dependence on solar cycles as well as satellite locations. This study demonstrates the validity and value of the method that infers local magnetic field directions from particle spin-resolved distributions.},
doi = {10.5194/angeo-34-831-2016},
journal = {Annales Geophysicae (Online)},
number = 9,
volume = 34,
place = {Germany},
year = {Wed Sep 21 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Sep 21 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-831-2016

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The energy spectrometer for particles (ESP): Instrument description and orbital performance
conference, January 1996

  • Meier, M. M.; Belian, R. D.; Cayton, T. E.
  • Workshop on the Earth’s trapped particle environment, AIP Conference Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.51533

REPAD: An empirical model of pitch angle distributions for energetic electrons in the Earth's outer radiation belt: pitch-angle model for outer-belt e-
journal, March 2014

  • Chen, Yue; Friedel, Reiner H. W.; Henderson, Michael G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 119, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019431

Event-specific chorus wave and electron seed population models in DREAM3D using the Van Allen Probes: Tu et al.: Event-specific chorus and seed electrons
journal, March 2014

  • Tu, Weichao; Cunningham, G. S.; Chen, Y.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013GL058819

Relativistic electrons in the outer-zone: An 11 year cycle; Their relation to the solar wind
conference, January 1996

  • Belian, R. D.; Cayton, T. E.; Christensen, R. A.
  • Workshop on the Earth’s trapped particle environment, AIP Conference Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.51526

Modeling the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere during strong geomagnetic storms
journal, January 2005


The energization of relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen radiation belt
journal, July 2007

  • Chen, Yue; Reeves, Geoffrey D.; Friedel, Reiner H. W.
  • Nature Physics, Vol. 3, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1038/nphys655

An observational test of the Tsyganenko (T89a) model of the magnetospheric field
journal, November 1996

  • Thomsen, M. F.; McComas, D. J.; Reeves, G. D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 101, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/96JA02318

High- Z energetic particles at geosynchronous orbit during the Great Solar Proton Event Series of October 1989
journal, January 1992

  • Belian, R. D.; Gisler, G. R.; Cayton, T.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 97, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/92JA01139

A statistical comparison of commonly used external magnetic field models: A COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC FIELD MODELS
journal, October 2008

  • McCollough, J. P.; Gannon, J. L.; Baker, D. N.
  • Space Weather, Vol. 6, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008SW000391

“Pancake” electron distributions in the outer radiation belts
journal, June 1999

  • Meredith, Nigel P.; Johnstone, Alan D.; Szita, Sarah
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 104, Issue A6
  • DOI: 10.1029/1998JA900083

Deep dielectric charging effects due to high-energy electrons in earth's outer magnetosphere
journal, October 1987


Acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons during geomagnetic storms: ACCELERATION AND LOSS OF RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS
journal, May 2003

  • Reeves, G. D.; McAdams, K. L.; Friedel, R. H. W.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 30, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002GL016513

A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet
journal, January 1989


Storm-time distortion of the inner magnetosphere: How severe can it get?: DISTORTION OF THE INNER MAGNETOSPHERE
journal, May 2003

  • Tsyganenko, N. A.; Singer, H. J.; Kasper, J. C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 108, Issue A5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009808

Multisatellite determination of the relativistic electron phase space density at geosynchronous orbit: An integrated investigation during geomagnetic storm times: STORM
journal, November 2007

  • Chen, Y.; Friedel, R. H. W.; Reeves, G. D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 112, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012314

Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model: DREAM: DYNAMIC RADIATION ENVIRONMENT ASSIMILATION MODEL
journal, March 2012

  • Reeves, G. D.; Chen, Y.; Cunningham, G. S.
  • Space Weather, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011SW000729

A quantitative assessment of empirical magnetic field models at geosynchronous orbit during magnetic storms: TEST MAGNETIC FIELD MODELS
journal, April 2008

  • Huang, Chia-Lin; Spence, Harlan E.; Singer, Howard J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 113, Issue A4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012623